Advertisement

Learning Through and from Drawing in Early Years Geometry

  • Nathalie Sinclair
  • Joan Moss
  • Zachary Hawes
  • Carol Stephenson
Chapter
Part of the Research in Mathematics Education book series (RME)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the relations between spatial reasoning, drawing and mathematics learning. Based on the strong link that has been found in educational psychology between children’s finished drawings and their mathematical achievement, and the central importance of diagramming in mathematics thinking and learning, we wanted to study children’s actual drawing process in order to gain insight into how the movements of their hands and eyes can play a role in perceiving, creating, and interpreting geometric shapes and patterns. We pay particular attention to the interplay between children’s drawings and their gestures, to the role of language in modulating children’s perceptions, and to the back and forth that drawing seems to invite between two-dimensional and three-dimensional perceptions of geometric figures. We seek to forge new ways of including drawing as part of the teaching and learning of geometry and offer new ways of thinking about and analyzing the types of spatial/geometric reasoning young children are capable of.

Keywords

Diagram Gesture Geometry Verbal Visual Triangle Square Symmetry Congruence Dimensional deconstruction Pointing Tracing Structure Transformation Array Quick draw Segment Diagonal 

References

  1. Battista, M. T., Clements, D. H., Arnoff, J., Battista, K., & Borrow, C. V. A. (1998). Students’ spatial structuring of 2D arrays of squares. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(5), 503–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beery, K., & Beery, N. (2010). The Beery–Buktenica developmental test of visual motor integration (6th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Boonen, A. J., van der Schoot, M., van Wesel, F., de Vries, M. H., & Jolles, J. (2013). What underlies successful word problem solving? A path analysis in sixth grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boonen, A. J., van Wesel, F., Jolles, J., & van der Schoot, M. (2014). The role of visual representation type, spatial ability, and reading comprehension in word problem solving: An item-level analysis in elementary school children. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bremigan, E. G. (2005). An analysis of diagram modification and construction in students’ solutions to applied calculus problems. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 36(3), 248–277.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualisation and young children’s exploration of “big ideas”. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 319–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson, A. G., Rowe, E., & Curby, T. W. (2013). Disentangling fine motor skills’ relations to academic achievement: The relative contributions of visual-spatial integration and visual-motor coordination. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 174(5), 514–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Case, R., & Okamoto, Y. (1996). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61 (Nos. 1–2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Châtelet, G. (2000). Les enjeux du mobile. Paris: Seuil English translation by R. Shore & M. Zagha: Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics, and physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, C.-L., & Herbst, P. (2013). The interplay among gestures, discourse, and diagrams in students’ geometrical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(2), 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Claparede, E. (1907). Plan d’experiences collectives sur le dessin des enfants. Archives de Psychologic, 6, 276–278.Google Scholar
  12. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooke, E. (1885). Art teaching and child nature. London Journal of Education.Google Scholar
  14. de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2012). Diagram, gesture, agency: Theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diezmann, C, M. & English, L. D. (2001). Promoting the use of diagrams as tools for thinking. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics (pp. 77–89). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  16. Duval, R. (1998). Geometry from a cognitive point of view. In C. Mammana & V. Villani (Eds.), Perspectives on the teaching of geometry for the 21st Century: an ICMI study (pp. 37–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  17. Duval, R. (2005). Les conditions cognitives de l’apparentissage de la géométrie: Développement de la visualisation, differenciation des raisonnement et coordination de leurs fonctionnements. Annales de didactique et sciences cognitives, 10, 5–53.Google Scholar
  18. Goodenough, F. L. (1926a). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: World Book.Google Scholar
  19. Goodenough, F. L. (1926b). A new approach to the measurement of the intelligence of young children. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 33(2), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grissmer, D., Grimm, K. J., Aiyer, S. M., Murrah, W. M., & Steele, J. S. (2010). Fine motor skills and early comprehension of the world: Two new school readiness indicators. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1008–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanlon, A. E. C. (2010). Investigating the influence of Quick Draw on pre-service elementary teachers beliefs, in concordance with spatial and geometric thinking: A mixed methods study. (Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University).Google Scholar
  22. Hawes, Z., Tepylo, D., & Moss, J. (2015). Developing spatial thinking: Implications for early mathematics education. In B. Davis & Spatial Reasoning Study Group (Eds.), Spatial reasoning in the early years: Principles, assertions and speculations (pp. 29–44). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual–spatial representations andmathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2015). Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning. Learning and Instruction, 35, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ivanoff, E. (1909). Recherches experimentales sur le dessin des ecoliers de la Suisse Romande: Correlation entre l’aptitude an dessin et les autres aptitudes. Archives de Psychologic, 8, 97–156.Google Scholar
  26. Kamphaus, R. W., & Pleiss, K. L. (1992). Draw-a-person techniques: Tests in search of a construct. Journal of School Psychology, 29(4), 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kellogg, R. (1970). Analyzing children’s art. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  28. Kulp, M. T. (1999). Relationship between visual motor integration skill and academic performance in kindergarten through third grade. Optometry & Vision Science, 76(3), 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurdek, L. A., & Sinclair, R. J. (2001). Predicting reading and mathematics achievement in fourth-grade children from kindergarten readiness scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 451–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics come from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, NY: Basic books.Google Scholar
  31. Malanchini, M., Tosto, M. G., Garfield, V., Dirik, A., Czerwik, A., Arden, R., … Kovas, Y. (2016). Preschool drawing and school mathematics: The nature of the association. Child Development, 87(3), 929–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y. L. (2012). The relation between space and math: Developmental and educational implications. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 42, 197–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moss, J., Bruce, C., Caswell, B., Flynn, T., & Hawes, Z. (2016). Taking Shape: Activities to develop geometric and spatial thinking. Don Mills, ON: Pearson Education Canada.Google Scholar
  34. Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Núñez, R. (2003). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In R. Hersh (Ed.), 18 unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics (pp. 160–181). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Nunokawa, K. (2006). Using drawings and generating information in mathematical problem solving processes. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), 34–54.  https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Outhred, L. N., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2000). Young children’s intuitive understanding of rectangular area measurement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 144–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pieters, S., Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., Vanderswalmen, R., & Van Waelvelde, H. (2012). Behind mathematical learning disabilities: What about visual perception and motor skills? Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 498–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sinclair, N., & Gol Tabaghi, S. (2010). Drawing space: Mathematicians’ kinetic conceptions of eigenvectors. Education Studies in Mathematics, 74(3), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sortor, J. M., & Kulp, M. T. (2003). Are the results of the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual–Motor Integration and its subtests related to achievement test scores? Optometry and Vision Science, 80, 758–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facturing of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steenpaß, A., & Steinbring, H. (2014). Young students’ subjective interpretations of mathematical diagrams— elements of the theoretical construct “frame-based interpreting competence”. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sundberg, N. D. (1961). The practice of psychological testing in clinical services in the United States. American Psychologist, 16, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tzuriel, D., & Egozi, G. (2010). Gender differences in spatial ability of young children: The effects of training and processing strategies. Child Development, 81(5), 1417–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Weckbacher, L. M., & Okamoto, Y. (2015). Discovering space in the elementary classroom. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(1), 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wheatley, G. H. (1997). Reasoning with images in mathematical activity. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 281–297). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  49. Wheatley, G. H. (2007). Quick draw: Developing spatial sense in mathematics (2nd ed.). Bethany Beach, DE: Mathematics Learning.Google Scholar
  50. Whiteley, W. (2002). Teaching to see like a mathematician. Retrieved from http://www.math.yorku.ca/~whiteley/Teaching_to_see.pdf.
  51. Yackel, E., & Wheatley, G. H. (1990). Spatial sense: Promoting visual imagery in young pupils. Arithmetic Teacher, 37(6), 52–58.Google Scholar
  52. Yancey, A. V., Thompson, C. S., & Yancey, J. S. (1989). Children must learn to draw diagrams. Arithmetic Teacher, 36(7), 15–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathalie Sinclair
    • 1
  • Joan Moss
    • 2
  • Zachary Hawes
    • 2
  • Carol Stephenson
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations