Advertisement

IoT Business Model Innovation and the Stage-Gate Process

An Exploratory Analysis
  • Jan F. TeschEmail author
  • Anne-Sophie Brillinger
  • Dominik Bilgeri
Chapter
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

Large manufacturing companies will in future be continuously challenged to develop and implement new IoT-related business models. Existing research offers interesting insights on high-level stages of business model innovation (BMI) processes in general. However, only little is known about the presence of main gates in BMI processes and even less about the underlying decision criteria applied at these gates. To shed more light on this research field, 27 expert interviews with employees from eight companies across the IoT ecosystem were conducted. The expert interviews reveal that, despite the increasing popularity of (radically) new innovation approaches, two main decision points can be identified across BMI processes. These findings are a first explorative step towards a better understanding of IoT adoption and provide a starting point for interesting future research avenues.

Keywords

Internet of things Business model innovation Stage-Gate system Case study research 

References

  1. Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M. S. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaikie, N. W. H. (1991). A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality & Quantity, 25(2), 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Zhu, F. (2013). Business model innovation and competitive imitation. The case of sponsor-based business models. Strategic Management Journal, 34(4), 464–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavalcante, S. A. (2014). Designing business model change. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(02), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 354–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, R. G. (2008). Perspective: The stage-gate® idea-to-launch process—update, what’s new, and NexGen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, R. G. (2014). What’s next?: After stage-gate. Research-Technology Management, 57(1), 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cortimiglia, M. N., Ghezzi, A., & Frank, A. G. (2016). Business model innovation and strategy making nexus. Evidence from a cross-industry mixed-methods study. R&D Management, 46(3), 414–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution. in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 413–427). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Desyllas, P., & Sako, M. (2013). Profiting from business model innovation: Evidence from pay-as-you-drive auto insurance. Research Policy, 42(1), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleisch, E., Weinberger, M., & Wortmann, F. (2014). Business models and the internet of things. available at: http://www.iot-lab.ch/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/EN_Bosch-Lab-White-Paper-GM-im-IOT-1_3.pdf.
  19. Frankenberger, K., Weiblen, T., Csik, M., & Gassmann, O. (2013). The 4I-framework of business model innovation: A structured view on process phases and challenges. International Journal of Product Development, 18(3/4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gephart, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Günzel, F., & Holm, A. B. (2013). One size does not fit all—Understanding the front-end and back-end of business model innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harmancioglu, N., McNally, R. C., Calantone, R. J., & Durmusoglu, S. S. (2007). Your new product development (NPD) is only as good as your process: an exploratory analysis of new NPD process design and implementation. R&D Management, 37(5), 399–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2014). Digital ubiquity: How connections, sensors, and data are revolutionizing business (digest summary). Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 91–99.Google Scholar
  24. Koen, P. A., Bertels, H. M. J., & Elsum, I. R. (2011). The three faces of business model innovation. Challenges for established firm. Research technology management, 54(3), 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koh, S. L., Gunasekaran, A., & Goodman, T. (2011). Drivers, barriers and critical success factors for ERPII implementation in supply chains: A critical analysis. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(4), 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuckartz, U. (2012). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung [Qualitative content analysis. Methods, practice, computer assistance]. Weinheim and Basel: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar
  27. Landau, C., Karna, A., & Sailer, M. (2016). Business model adaptation for emerging markets. A case study of a German automobile manufacturer in India. R&D Management, 46(3), 480–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laudien, S. M., & Daxböck, B. (2016). Business model innovation processes of average market players. A qualitative-empirical analysis. R&D Management, 47(3), 420–430.Google Scholar
  30. Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1(3), 248–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–92.Google Scholar
  34. Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive innovation. In need of better theory*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mattern, F., & Floerkemeier, C. (2010). From the internet of computers to the internet of things. In D. Hutchison, T. Kanade, J. Kittler, J. M. Kleinberg, F. Mattern, J. C. Mitchell, et al. (Eds.), From active data management to event-based systems and more (Vol. 6462, pp. 242–259)., Lecture notes in computer science Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mattern, F., & Flörkemeier, C. (2010). Vom Internet der Computer zum Internet der Dinge. Informatik-Spektrum, 33(2), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2008). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 11–64.Google Scholar
  39. Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How constant innovation creates radically successful businesses. London: Portfolio Penguin.Google Scholar
  40. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Business model innovation. Towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schnell, R., Hill, P. B., & Esser, E. (2014). “Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung”.Google Scholar
  43. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vermesan, O., Friess, P., Guillemin, P., Sundmaeker, H., Eisenhauer, M., Moessner, K., et al. (2013). Internet of things strategic research and innovation agenda. In River Publishers series in communication (pp. 7–151).Google Scholar
  45. Westerlund, M., Leminen, S., & Rajahonka, M. (2014). Designing business models for the internet of things. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(7), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wirtz, B. W., Schilke, O., & Ullrich, S. (2010). Strategic development of business models: Implications of the Web 2.0 for creating value on the internet. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 272–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods [3rd printing] (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California, London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  49. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business Model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model. Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan F. Tesch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anne-Sophie Brillinger
    • 2
  • Dominik Bilgeri
    • 3
  1. 1.University of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Catholic University of Eichstätt-IngolstadtEichstättGermany
  3. 3.ETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations