Complaint Processing

  • Bernd Stauss
  • Wolfgang Seidel
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)


For systematic planning of the complaint processing it is first necessary to identify the relevant process types. Depending on the extent of responsibility for the operative complaint processing, three basic types can be differentiated: independent processes, cooperative processes and transfer processes. A second classification based on the criterion of reaction urgency distinguishes between routine and non-routine processes.

The analysis of all current complaint processing procedures must be performed from the company’s perspective as well as from the customers’ perspective in order to achieve both efficiency and complaint satisfaction among customers. On the basis of this analysis the logical sequence of processing steps must be defined and the responsibilities in each step determined. There are three types of responsibility: the “process owner” for the entire management process, the “complaint owner” for the individual case processing, and the “task owner” for the individual phases of complaint processing.

Furthermore, it is necessary to determine clear deadlines for all identified complaint processing procedures as well as for their sub-processes and processing steps. Compliance with the deadlines must be monitored by an employee-oriented reminder system and an associated escalation system, that can extend over several hierarchical levels. With regard to the communication in cross-departmental processes, it is important to determine which information is to be delivered between which units involved, on which paths and within which time limits. The individual processing steps must be documented in the complaint-processing history as well as in the customer-contact and complaint history.


  1. Boshoff C (1997) An experimental study of service recovery options. Int J Serv Ind Manag 8(2):110–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kingman-Brundage J (1992) The ABC’s of service system blueprinting. In: Lovelock C (ed) Managing services: marketing, operations, and human resources, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall International, London, pp 96–102Google Scholar
  3. Liao H (2007) Do it right this time: the role of employee service recovery performance in customer-perceived justice and customer loyalty after service failures. J Appl Psychol 92(2):475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. McDougall GHG, Levesque TJ (1999) Waiting for service: the effectiveness of recovery strategies. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 11(1):6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Servicebarometer (2017) Kundenmonitor Deutschland 2017. Servicebarometer, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  6. Shostack GL (1987) Service positioning through structural change. J Mark 51(1):34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Swanson SR, Kelley SW (2001) Service recovery attributions and word-of-mouth intentions. Eur J Mark 35(1/2):194–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Varela-Neira C et al (2010) The effects of customer age and recovery strategies in a service failure setting. J Financ Serv Mark 15(1):32–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wirtz J, Mattila AS (2004) Consumer responses to compensation, speed of recovery and apology after a service failure. Int J Serv Ind Manag 15(2):150–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Stauss
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Seidel
    • 2
  1. 1.Catholic University of Eichstätt-IngolstadtIngolstadtGermany
  2. 2.servmark consultancyIngolstadt and MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations