Principles of Complaint Management

  • Bernd Stauss
  • Wolfgang Seidel
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)


The overall goal of complaint management is to increase the competitiveness and profit of the company. This overall goal can be broken down into sub-goals that can be assigned to the areas of customer relationship management and quality management. Furthermore, there is the requirement of productive task fulfillment. Primary sub-goals with respect to customer relationships are to prevent customer churn and to achieve positive effects on revenues, corporate image and word-of-mouth communication. To what extent these customer relationship-related targets are achieved can be determined by means of the following key performance indicators: articulation rate/non-articulation rate, registration rate/non-registration rate, proportion of convinced/disappointed complainants, recommendation rate/warning rate and repurchase rate/churn rate.

With regard to quality management, complaint management aims to improve the product quality and to reduce failure costs by the use of the information contained in complaints. The quality-related relevant key performance indicators are: defect rate, annoyance rate, warranty rate and guarantee rate.

Regarding the complaint management tasks, it is useful to distinguish between the direct and the indirect complaint management processes. The tasks of the direct complaint management process include direct contacts with customers, and these primarily serve the customer relationship-related sub-goals: complaint stimulation, complaint acceptance, complaint processing and complaint reaction. Tasks that can be performed without customer contact, belong to the indirect complaint management process and aim to achieve the quality-related sub-goals: complaint evaluation, complaint-management controlling, complaint reporting and utilization of complaint information.

Optimal fulfillment of the tasks requires an appropriate design of the human resources, and of the organizational and technological framework.


  1. Brown SW et al (1996) Service recovery: its value and limitations as a retail strategy. Int J Serv Ind Manag 7(5):32–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chebat J-C et al (2005) Silent voice—why some dissatisfied consumers fail to complain. J Serv Res 7(4):328–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davidow M (2003) Organizational responses to customer complaints: what works and what doesn’t. J Serv Res 5(3):225–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Durvasula S et al (2000) Business-to-business marketing: service recovery and customer satisfaction issues with ocean shipping lines. Eur J Mark 34(3/4):433–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnston R, Mehra S (2002) Best-practice complaint management. Acad Manag Exec 16(4):145–154Google Scholar
  6. La KV, Kandampully J (2004) Market orientated learning and customer value enhancement through service recovery management. Manag Serv Qual 14(5):390–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Smith AK, Bolton RN (1998) An experimental investigation of customer reactions to service failure and recovery encounters—paradox or peril? J Serv Res 1(1):65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stauss B (2002) The dimensions of complaint satisfaction: process and outcome complaint satisfaction versus cold fact and warm act complaint satisfaction. Manag Serv Qual 12(3):173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stauss B, Seidel W (2010) Complaint management. In: Salvendy G, Karwowski W (eds) Introduction to service engineering. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 414–432Google Scholar
  10. Stauss B, Seidel W (2012) Complaint management in retailing. In: Kandampully J (ed) Service management, the new paradigm in retailing. Springer, New York, pp 207–230Google Scholar
  11. Tax SS, Brown SW (1998) Recovering and learning from service failure. Sloan Manag Rev 40(1):75–88Google Scholar
  12. Vos JFJ et al (2008) How organisations can learn from complaints. TQM J 20(1):8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Stauss
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Seidel
    • 2
  1. 1.Catholic University of Eichstätt-IngolstadtIngolstadtGermany
  2. 2.servmark consultancyIngolstadt and MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations