Advertisement

Personalized Landmark Recommendation for Language-Specific Users by Open Data Mining

  • Siya BaoEmail author
  • Masao Yanagisawa
  • Nozomu Togawa
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 791)

Abstract

This paper proposes a personalized landmark recommendation algorithm aiming at exploring new sights into the determinants of landmark satisfaction prediction. We gather 1,219,048 user-generated comments in Tokyo, Shanghai and New York from four travel websites. We find that users have diverse satisfaction on landmarks those findings, we propose an effective algorithm for personalize landmark satisfaction prediction. Our algorithm provides the top-6 landmarks with the highest satisfaction to users for a one-day trip plan our proposed algorithm has better performances than previous studies from the viewpoints of landmark recommendation and landmark satisfaction prediction.

Keywords

User-generated comment Landmark satisfaction prediction Landmark recommendation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 17K19986).

References

  1. 1.
    Filieri, R., Alguezaui, S., McLeay, F.: Why do travelers trust TripAdvisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth. Tour. Manag. 51, 174–185 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pantano, E., Priporas, C., Stylos, N.: You will like it! using open data to predict tourists’ response to a tourist attraction. Tour. Manag. 60, 430–438 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weaver, D., Kwek, A., Wang, Y.: Cultural connectedness and visitor segmentation in diaspora Chinese tourism. Tour. Manag. 63, 302–314 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dolnicar, S., Grun, B.: Assessing analytical robustness in cross-cultural comparisons. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 1, 140–160 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Lops, P., de Gemmis, M., Semeraro, M.: Basics of content-based recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 75–78. Springer, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Darlington, R., Hayes, A.: Nonlinear relationships. In: Little, T. (ed.) Regression Analysis and Linear Models Concepts, Applications, and Implementation, pp. 358–362. Guilford Press, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Jong, P.: Time series analysis. In Frees, E., Derrig, R., Meyers, G. (eds.) Predictive Modeling Applications in Actuarial Science: Volume 1, Predictive Modeling Techniques, Applications, and Implementation, pp. 434–436. Cambridge University Press, London (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khopkar, S., Nikolaev, A.: Predicting long-term product ratings based on few early ratings and user base analysis. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 21, 38–49 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Communications EngineeringWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations