Cultivating Students’ Diverse Abilities Through Arts Education: Emergence of the STEAM Perspective

Part of the International and Development Education book series (INTDE)


STEM has played a crucial role in promoting innovation and national competitiveness, while STEAM-learning, integrated arts with STEM, represents a new direction of education in the twenty-first century. This chapter identifies the STEAM research and Arts Education movement in China. An analysis of the methodology used in the visual arts teaching in a primary school exposes some changes of Arts Education in recent years. It can be summarized as follows: the teaching ideal and methodology has moved from focusing on skill mastery to the cultivation of comprehensive abilities; results are no longer considered as important as facilitating a learning-based approach; visual arts are no longer regarded as merely a single discipline. While maintaining the function of its own discipline, the Arts Education also has interdisciplinary features. This kind of Arts Education can develop the students’ abilities, such as creative thinking, problem-solving, and communication. And all of these can enhance and deepen the STEM fields study.


STEM Arts education Visual arts Core competency Storytelling 


  1. Chen Yi-qian. 2015. “Integration and Implementation: The Reform of Art Edcution in the Technological Era.”Google Scholar
  2. China’ State Council. 2014. “To Develop the Chinese Students’ Core Competencies.”
  3. China’ State Council. 2015. “The Opinion on Strengthening and Improving School Overall Aesthetic Education.”
  4. College Board. 2011. “College-Bound Seniors.”
  5. Department of Education Information Center, and Beijing Normal University. 2017. Chinese STEAM Education Report. Beijing: China.Google Scholar
  6. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2012. “Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.”
  7. Swaby, Keri, and Jeremy V. Ernst. 2016. “STEM Education Fiscal Year 2015: An Analysis of Educational Investments and Expectations.” Journal of STEM Teacher Education 51 (1): 17–31.Google Scholar
  8. The President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities. 2011. “Reinvesting in Arts Education: Winning America’s Future Through Creative Schools.”
  9. UNESCO. 2006. Road Map for Arts Education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  10. U.S. National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. A Report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  11. Vaughn, Kathryn, and Ellen Winner. 2000. “SAT Scores of Students Who Study the Arts: What We Can and Cannot Conclude About the Association.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 34 (3/4): 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wei, Tian-yu, ed. 2015. Creative Arts Education in Big Data Era: The Fifth World Arts Education Report (1) 49–53. China: East China Normal University. Google Scholar
  13. Yakman, Georgette. 2010. “What is the Point of STEAM? A Brief Overview of STEAM Education.” August 7.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Chubu UniversityKasugaiJapan

Personalised recommendations