If the Body Is Part of Our Discourse, Why Not Let It Speak? Five Critical Perspectives

  • Maxine Sheets-JohnstoneEmail author
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 97)


Of the five perspectives set forth in this essay, four of them specify obstacles that block experiential understandings of emotions. The obstacles in one way and another subvert the living body, whether presenting it as a mere face or as an ahistorical adult body, as an embodied phenomenon or as a brain unattached to a whole-body nervous system. Such accounts bypass the affective dynamics that move through bodies and move them to move. Being true to the truths of experience, the fifth perspective, requires recognition of our infancy and even of our prenatal lives, both of which are tethered to developmental movement. It furthermore requires recognition of affective realties as subject-world relationships and recognition of the dynamic congruency of emotions and movement. In the end, the perspectives lead us to inquire about “the things themselves.”


Animate Dynamic Brain Embodied Infancy 


  1. Bell, Sir Charles. 1844. The anatomy and philosophy of expression. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bull, Nina. 1951. The attitude theory of emotion. In Nervous and mental disease monographs, x ed., x–x. New York: Coolidge Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Darwin, Charles. 1965 [1872]. the expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1987. In Charles Darwin’s notebooks, 1836–1844, ed. Paul H. Barrett, Peter J. Gautrey, Sandra Herbert, David Kohn, and Sydney Smith. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dennett, Daniel. 1983. Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: The ‘Panglossian’ Paradigm Defended. Behavioral and Brain SCIENCES 6: 343–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekman, Paul, J. J. Campos, R. J. Davidson, F. B. M. de Waal. 2003. Expression: Panel discussion. In Emotions inside out: 130 years after Darwin’s The expression of the emotions in man and animals, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. vol. 1000, 266–278. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freedberg, David, and Vittorio Gallese. 2007. Motion, emotion and empathy in aesthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Science 11 (5): 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Furuhjelm, Mirjam, Axel Ingelman-Sundberg, and Claes Wirsén. 1977. A child is born, rev. ed. New York: Delacorte Press/Seymour Lawrence.Google Scholar
  9. Gallese, Vittorio. 2000. The inner sense of action: agency and motor representations. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (10): 23–40.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobson, Edmund. 1970. Modern treatment of tense patients. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  11. Johnstone, Albert A. 2012. The deep bodily roots of emotion. Husserl Studies 28 (3): 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jung, Carl. G. 1968. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, 2nd ed. Trans. R. F. C. Hull. Bollingen Series XX. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Landis, Carney, and William A. Hunt. 1939. The startle pattern. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.Google Scholar
  14. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception, Trans. Colin Smith. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Librairie Gallimard.Google Scholar
  15. Panksepp, Jaak. 2005. Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (1): 30–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramachandran, V.S. 2006 (1.10.06). “Mirror Neurons and the Brain in the Vat” (Response to “What Is Your Dangerous Idea?”). Edge: The Third Culture.Google Scholar
  17. Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Leonardo Fogassi, and Vittorio Gallese. 2006. Mirrors in the mind. Scientific American 295(November): 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Romer, Alfred S. 1954. Man and the vertebrates. Vol. 1. Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Romer, Alfred S., and Thomas S. Parsons. 1977. The vertebrate body. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
  20. Rowlands, Mark. 2010. The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. Cambridge: Bradford Books/MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1956. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  22. Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 1999a. Emotions and movement: A beginning empirical-phenomenological analysis of their relationship. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(11–12): 259–277; included in Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2009. The Corporeal Turn: An Interdisciplinary Reader, 195–218. Exeter: Imprint Academic, Chapter VIII.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1999b/exp. 2nd ed. 2011. The primacy of movement. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins publishing.Google Scholar
  24. ________. 2006. Sur la nature de la confiance. InLes moments de la confiance, ed. Albert Ogien and Louis Quéré, 23–41. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2009. Animation: The fundamental, essential, and properly descriptive concept. Continental Philosophy Review 42: 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2010. Kinesthetic experience: understanding movement inside and out. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy 5 (2): 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2011. The corporeal turn: reflections on awareness and gnostic tactility and Kinaesthesia. Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (7–8): 145–168.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2012. Movement and mirror neurons: a challenging and choice conversation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stern, Daniel N. 1985. The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1993. The role of feelings for an interpersonal self. In The perceived self: ecological and interpersonal sources of self-knowledge, ed. Ulric Neisser. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. The Teaching Company. 2011. Science News 175 (13): 3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations