Individual and Collective Reputations in the Wine Industry

  • Florine LivatEmail author


Two seemingly opposite reputation models appear to coexist in the wine industry: geographic indications and collective reputation in the Old World on the first hand, and branded wines and individual reputation in the New World on the other hand. These models are the result of natural, economic, and institutional features of the wine industry. This chapter mostly focuses on the collective reputation model, its effects as well as its failures, to show that such a categorization might be simplistic. Both coexist more and more frequently on the same label, suggesting in some way a convergence of both reputational models.


  1. Addor, F., and A. Grazioli. 2002. Geographical indications beyond wines and spirits. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 5 (6): 865–897.Google Scholar
  2. Anania, G., and R. Nisticò. 2004. Public regulation as a substitute for trust in quality food markets: What if the trust substitute cannot be fully trusted? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160: 681–701.Google Scholar
  3. Anson, J. 2010. “Cronyist” CIVB to be sued by breakaway group. Decanter, December 10.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2013. Montlouis-sur-Loire cuts itself loose from InterLoire. Decanter, January 9.Google Scholar
  5. Ashenfelter, O., S. Ciccarella, and H.J. Shatz. 2007. French wine and the US boycott of 2003: Does politics really affect commerce? Journal of Wine Economics 2 (01): 55–74.Google Scholar
  6. Atkin, T., and R. Johnson. 2010. Appellation as an indicator of quality. International Journal of Wine Business Research 22 (1): 42–61.Google Scholar
  7. Auriol, E., and S.G. Schilizzi. 2003. Quality signaling through certification: Theory and an application to agricultural seed markets. IDEI Working Paper, 165. Toulouse: Institut d’Economie Industrielle (IDEI).Google Scholar
  8. Banks, G., and J. Overton. 2010. Old world, new world, third world? Reconceptualising the worlds of wine. Journal of Wine Research 21 (1): 57–75.Google Scholar
  9. Barham, E. 2003. Translating terroir: The global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies 19 (1): 127–138.Google Scholar
  10. Batt, P.J., and A. Dean. 2000. Factors influencing the consumer’s decision. Australian & New Zealand Wine Industry Journal 15 (4): S34–S41.Google Scholar
  11. Belletti, G. 2000. Origin labelled products, reputation and heterogeneity of firms. Actes et Communications: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. Economie et Sociologie Rurales 17 (1): 239–259.Google Scholar
  12. Blanchy, G. 2010. La construction des vins argentins à travers l’affichage. Sciences de la Société 80: 60–75.Google Scholar
  13. Bramley, C., E. Biénabe, and J. Kirsten. 2009. The economics of geographical indications: Towards a conceptual framework for geographical indication research in developing countries. The Economics of Intellectual Property, 109–141. Available at
  14. Broude, T. 2005. Taking trade and culture seriously: Geographical indications and cultural protection in WTO. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 26: 623.Google Scholar
  15. Bruwer, J., and M. House. 2003. Has the era of regional branding arrived for the Australian wine industry? Some perspectives. The Australian & New Zealand Grapegrower & Winemaker, December 1.Google Scholar
  16. Bureau, J.C., and E. Valceschini. 2003. European food-labeling policy: Successes and limitations. Journal of Food Distribution Research 34 (3): 70–76.Google Scholar
  17. Cardinale, S., B. Nguyen, and T.C. Melewar. 2016. Place-based brand experience, place attachment and loyalty. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 34 (3): 302–317.Google Scholar
  18. Castriota, S., and M. Delmastro. 2011. Inside the black box of collective reputation (No. 89/2011). Perugia: Università di Perugia, Dipartimento Economia.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2012. Seller reputation: Individual, collective, and institutional factors. Journal of Wine Economics 7 (01): 49–69.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2014. The economics of collective reputation: Evidence from the wine industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97 (2): 469–489. Scholar
  21. Charters, S., and N. Spielmann. 2014. Characteristics of strong territorial brands: The case of champagne. Journal of Business Research 67 (7): 1461–1467.Google Scholar
  22. Choi, C.J., S.H. Lee, and D. Oh. 1995. The strategy of grouping and reputation linkage in clubs and multi-product firms. European Journal of Political Economy 11 (3): 521–533.Google Scholar
  23. Cuellar, S.S., D. Karnowsky, and F. Acosta. 2009. The Sideways effect: A test for changes in the demand for merlot and pinot noir wines. Journal of Wine Economics 4 (02): 219–232.Google Scholar
  24. Defrancesco, E., J.E. Orrego, and A. Gennari. 2012. Would ‘New World’ wines benefit from protected geographical indications in international markets? The case of Argentinean Malbec. Wine Economics and Policy 1 (1): 63–72.Google Scholar
  25. Delmastro, M. 2005. An investigation into the quality of wine: Evidence from Piedmont. Journal of Wine Research 16 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  26. Doward, J. 2005. French bitter over wine study. The Guardian, March 20.Google Scholar
  27. Dubois, P., and C. Nauges. 2010. Identifying the effect of unobserved quality and expert reviews in the pricing of experience goods: Empirical application on Bordeaux wine. International Journal of Industrial Organization 28 (3): 205–212.Google Scholar
  28. Easingwood, C., L. Lockshin, and T. Spawton. 2011. The drivers of wine regionality. Journal of Wine Research 22 (1): 19–33.Google Scholar
  29. Edwards, F. 1989. The marketing of wine from small wineries: Managing the intangibles. International Journal of Wine Marketing 1 (1): 14–17.Google Scholar
  30. Elliott, G.R., and R.C. Cameron. 1994. Consumer perception of product quality and the country-of-origin effect. Journal of International Marketing 2 (2): 49–62.Google Scholar
  31. Fombrun, C., and M. Shanley. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 233–258.Google Scholar
  32. Gergaud, O., F. Livat, B. Rickard, and F. Warzynski. 2017. Evaluating the net benefits of collective reputation: The case of Bordeaux wine. Food Policy 71: 8–16.Google Scholar
  33. Holmberg, L. 2010. Wine fraud. International Journal of Wine Research 2010 (2): 105–113.Google Scholar
  34. Hong, S.T., and R.S. Wyer. 1989. Effects of country-of-origin and product-attribute information on product evaluation: An information processing perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 16 (2): 175–187.Google Scholar
  35. Huber, J., and J. McCann. 1982. The impact of inferential beliefs on product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research 19: 324–333.Google Scholar
  36. Jacquet, O. 2009. Un siècle de construction du vignoble bourguignon: Les organisations vitivinicoles de 1884 aux AOC. Dijon: EUD, Collection Sociétés.Google Scholar
  37. Keushguerian, V., and I. Ghaplanyan 2015. Carving out a new market niche: Historic world of wines. BIO Web of Conferences, 5, 03002.Google Scholar
  38. Landon, S., and C.E. Smith. 1997. The use of quality and reputation indicators by consumers: The case of Bordeaux wine. Journal of Consumer Policy 20 (3): 289–323.Google Scholar
  39. Livat, F. 2007. Mesure des interactions de prix: Une analyse des modalités de substitution parmi sept vins de Bordeaux. Economie & Prévision 4: 127–145.Google Scholar
  40. Livat, F., J. Alston, and J.-M. Cardebat. forthcoming. Do denominations of origin provide useful quality signals? The case of Bordeaux wines. Economic Modelling.
  41. Lockshin, L., M. Rasmussen, and F. Cleary. 2000. The nature and roles of a wine brand. Australian & New Zealand Wine Industry Journal 15 (4): S17–S24.Google Scholar
  42. Lockshin, L., W. Jarvis, F. d’Hauteville, and J.P. Perrouty. 2006. Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice. Food Quality and Preference 17 (3): 166–178.Google Scholar
  43. Maheswaran, D. 1994. Country of origin as a stereotype: Effects of consumer expertise and attribute strength on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (2): 354–365.Google Scholar
  44. Marette, S. 2005. The collective-quality promotion in the agribusiness sector: An overview. Ames: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  45. Marie-Vivien, D. 2010. The role of the state in the protection of geographical indications: From disengagement in France/Europe to significant involvement in India. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 13 (2): 121–147.Google Scholar
  46. Meloni, G., and J. Swinnen. 2013. The political economy of European wine regulations. Journal of Wine Economics 8 (3): 244–284.Google Scholar
  47. Menapace, L., and G. Moschini. 2011. Quality certification by geographical indications, trademarks and firm reputation. European Review of Agricultural Economics 39 (4): 539–566.Google Scholar
  48. Mora, P. 2016. Wine positioning: A handbook with 30 case studies of wine brands and wine regions in the world. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Moschini, G., L. Menapace, and D. Pick. 2008. Geographical indications and the competitive provision of quality in agricultural markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (3): 794–812.Google Scholar
  50. Moulard, J., B.J. Babin, and M. Griffin. 2015. How aspects of a wine’s place affect consumers’ authenticity perceptions and purchase intentions: The role of country of origin and technical terroir. International Journal of Wine Business Research 27 (1): 61–78.Google Scholar
  51. Mount, I. 2012. The vineyard at the end of the world: Maverick winemakers and the rebirth of Malbec. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  52. Mueller, S., L. Lockshin, Y. Saltman, and J. Blanford. 2010. Message on a bottle: The relative influence of wine back label information on wine choice. Food Quality and Preference 21 (1): 22–32.Google Scholar
  53. Nourrisson, D. 2013. Le buveur du XIXe siècle. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  54. Orth, U.R., and P. Krška. 2001. Quality signals in wine marketing: The role of exhibition awards. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4 (4): 385–397.Google Scholar
  55. Pont, P.C.M., and H. Thomas. 2011. The sociotechnical alliance of Argentine quality wine: How Mendoza’s viticulture functions between the local and the global. Science, Technology & Human Values 37 (6): 627–652.Google Scholar
  56. Profeta, A., R. Balling, V. Schoene, and A. Wirsig. 2010. Protected geographical indications and designations of origin: An overview of the status quo and the development of the use of regulation (EC) 510/06 in Europe, with special consideration of the German situation. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 22 (1–2): 179–198.Google Scholar
  57. Rangnekar, D. 2004. The socio-economics of geographical indications. UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper, 8.Google Scholar
  58. Rasmussen, M., and L. Lockshin. 1999. Wine choice behaviour: The effect of regional branding. International Journal of Wine Marketing 11 (1): 36–46.Google Scholar
  59. Rickard, B.J., J.J. McCluskey, and R.W. Patterson. 2015. Reputation tapping. European Review of Agricultural Economics 42 (4): 675–701.Google Scholar
  60. Roberto, M.A. 2011. The changing structure of the global wine industry. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER) 2 (9): 1–14.Google Scholar
  61. Samiee, S. 1994. Customer evaluation of products in a global market. Journal of International Business Studies 25 (3): 579–604.Google Scholar
  62. Schamel, G. 2006. Geography versus brands in a global wine market. Agribusiness 22 (3): 363–374.Google Scholar
  63. ———. 2009. Dynamic analysis of brand and regional reputation: The case of wine. Journal of Wine Economics 4 (01): 62–80.Google Scholar
  64. Schamel, G., and K. Anderson. 2003. Wine quality and varietal, regional and winery reputation: Hedonic prices for Australia and New Zealand. Economic Record 79 (246): 357–369.Google Scholar
  65. Simpson, J. 2005. Cooperation and conflicts: Institutional innovation in France’s wine markets, 1870–1911. Business History Review 79 (03): 527–558.Google Scholar
  66. ———. 2011a. Creating wine: The emergence of a world industry, 1840–1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  67. ———. 2011b. Factor endowments, markets and vertical integration. The development of commercial wine production in Argentina, Australia and California, c1870–1914. Revista de Historia Económica/Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History (Second Series) 29 (01): 39–66.Google Scholar
  68. Spawton, T. 1986. Understanding wine purchasing: Knowing how the wine buyer behaves can increase sales. The Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal 1 (2): 54–57.Google Scholar
  69. Stanziani, A. 2004. Wine reputation and quality controls: The origin of the AOCs in 19th century France. European Journal of Law and Economics 18 (2): 149–167.Google Scholar
  70. Stasi, A., G. Nardone, R. Viscecchia, and A. Seccia. 2011. Italian wine demand and differentiation effect of geographical indications. International Journal of Wine Business Research 23 (1): 49–61.Google Scholar
  71. Teil, G. 2010. The French wine “appellations d’origine contrôlée” and the virtues of suspicion. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 13 (2): 253–274.Google Scholar
  72. Tirole, J. 1996. A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). The Review of Economic Studies 63 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  73. Townsend, C.G., and J.P. Tiefenbacher. 2011. Spatial change in South American viticulture: Static factors and dynamic processes in past, present, and future Chilean and Argentinean land use patterns and varietal choices. In Proceedings—International Geographical Union 2011 Regional Geography Conference, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  74. Van Ittersum, K., M.J. Candel, and M.T. Meulenberg. 2003. The influence of the image of a product’s region of origin on product evaluation. Journal of Business Research 56 (3): 215–226.Google Scholar
  75. Verlegh, P.W., and J.B.E. Steenkamp. 1999. A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology 20 (5): 521–546.Google Scholar
  76. Viot, C., and J. Passebois-Ducros. 2010. Wine brands or branded wines? The specificity of the French market in terms of the brand. International Journal of Wine Business Research 22 (4): 406–422.Google Scholar
  77. Vogel, D. 1995. Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Winfree, J.A., and J.J. McCluskey. 2005. Collective reputation and quality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (1): 206–213.Google Scholar
  79. Young, A. 1794. Travels during the years 1787, 1788 and 1789, undertaken more particularly with a view of ascertaining the cultivation, wealth, resources, and national prosperity, of the Kingdom of France. Vol. 2. Bury St. Edmunds: W. Richardson.Google Scholar
  80. Yuan, J., A.M. Morrison, S. Linton, R. Feng, and S.M. Jeon. 2004. Marketing small wineries: An exploratory approach to website evaluation. Tourism Recreation Research 29 (3): 15–25.Google Scholar
  81. Yue, C., S. Marette, and J.C. Beghin. 2013. How to promote quality perception: Brand advertising or geographical indication? Non-tariff measures with market imperfections: Trade and welfare implications 12: 73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kedge Business SchoolBordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations