Advertisement

Barriers to Wine Trade

  • Angela MarianiEmail author
  • Eugenio Pomarici
Chapter

Abstract

International wine trade is influenced by barriers which are relevant elements of the global wine market’s institutional setting. Trade barriers result from customs tariffs or from policy measures that can potentially have an economic effect on international trade quantity and direction of flows; such policy measures are classified in technical measures, non-technical measures, and export measures. In the wine market the impact of tariff barriers is rather small, despite not negligible; while non-tariff measures have an higher impact on flows and wine exporters have actively negotiated with importing countries’ preferential trade agreements to lower barriers. Scientific studies demonstrate the discriminatory effect of such preferential agreements and the heterogeneous impacts on trade of technical measures. Considering the current tensions in international relations, it is high the risk of a raising of barriers to trade in the next future; it is therefore urgent the empowerment of institutions, like International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV), in charge for harmonization of definitions and rules in wine production and trade.

References

  1. ABARES – Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences. 2012. Consultation with the Australian wine sector on barriers to trade in wine markets. Report to client prepared for the Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Ahearn, R.J. 2011. Europe’s preferential trade agreements: Status, content, and implications. Congressional Research Service, 7–5700. www.crs.gov, R41143, 1–41.
  3. Anderson, K. 2010. Excise and import taxes on wine versus beer and spirits: An international comparison. Economic Papers 29 (2): 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, K., and S. Nelgen. 2011. Global wine markets: A statistical compendium, 1961 to 2009. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press. www.adelaide.edu.au/press.
  5. Anderson, K., and G. Wittwer. 2015. Impact of Australia’s free trade agreements with China, Japan and Korea: The case of wine, Wine Economics Research Centre. Working paper No. 0415.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2017. U.K. and global wine markets by 2025, and implications of Brexit. Journal of Wine Economics 12 (3): 221–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2018. Brexit, follow-on FTAs, and global wine trade, University of Adelaide: Wine Economics Research Centre, Wine Policy Brief No. 19.Google Scholar
  8. Babili, M. 2009. Ad valorem equivalent in the WTO, NAPC-TPD. Working paper n. 43.Google Scholar
  9. Battaglene, T. 2014. An analysis of ingredient and nutritional labeling for wine. In BIO Web of Conferences. Vol. 3. EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
  10. Battaglene, T., and C. Milton. 2010. Potential impacts of organic wine regulation as a technical barrier to trade. In Proceedings of the 33rd World Congress of Vine and Wine, Tbilisi, Georgia, June 20–27.Google Scholar
  11. Cafaggi, F. 2016. Regulation through contracts: Supply-chain contracting and sustainability standards. European Review of Contract Law 12 (3): 218–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. COGEA. 2014. Study on the competitiveness of European wine. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  13. Dal Bianco, A., M.J. Estrella-Orrego, V.L. Boatto, and A.J. Gennari. 2017. Is Mercosur promoting trade? Insights from Argentinean wine exports. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 15 (1): 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dal Bianco, A., V. Boatto, F. Caracciolo, and F.G. Santeramo. 2016. Tariffs and non-tariff frictions in the world wine trade. European Review of Agricultural Economics 43 (1): 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Disdier, A.C., L. Fontagné, and M. Mimuni. 2007. The impact of regulations on agricultural trade: Evidence from SPS and TBT agreements. CEPII Working papers n. 04.Google Scholar
  16. Dunn, R.M., Jr., and J.H. Mutti. 2004. International economics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission. 2006. Global Europe: Competing in the world, communication COM (2006) 567.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2010. EU-South Korea free trade agreement: A quick reading guide. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/october/tradoc_145203.pdf.
  19. ———. 2014. CETA – Summary of the final negotiating results. Available at: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2014/december/tradoc_152982.pdf.
  20. ———. 2016. Report from the commission to the European Parliament and the council on trade and investment barriers. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/june/tradoc_155642.pdf.
  21. ———. 2018. Overview of FTA and other trade negotiations. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/december/tradoc_118238.pdf.
  22. Financial Times. 2015. The Doha round finally dies a merciful death. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/9cb1ab9e-a7e2-11e5-955c-1e1d6de94879.
  23. Flores, S.S. 2018. What is sustainability in the wine world? A cross-country analysis of wine sustainability frameworks. Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 2301–2312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henson, S., and J. Humphrey. 2009. The impacts of private food safety standards on the food chain and on public standard-setting processes. Paper prepared for FAO/WHO. Available at www.fao.org.
  25. ICE. 2010. Raccolta delle documentazioni necessarie per l’esportazione del vino. Verona.Google Scholar
  26. ISMEA. 2017. L’America first di Trump scenari globali per il commercio agroalimentare.Google Scholar
  27. Jourjon, F., H.C. Chou, A. Gezart, A.E. Kadison, L. Martinat, E. Pomarici, and R. Vecchio. 2016. Wineries evaluation of costs and benefits of sustainability certification program: The case of Terra Vitis in France, recent patents on food. Nutrition and Agriculture 8 (2): 138–147.Google Scholar
  28. Mariani, A., and A. Vastola. 2015. Sustainable winegrowing: Current perspectives. International Journal of Wine Research 7: 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mariani, A., E. Pomarici, and V. Boatto. 2012. The international wine trade: Recent trends and critical issues. Wine Economics and Policy 1 (1): 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mariani, A., F. Napoletano, E. Pomarici, and R. Vecchio. 2014a. Tariff and non-tariff barriers to wine exports and initiatives to reduce their effects. Agricultural Economics Review 15 (1): 5–24.Google Scholar
  31. Mariani, A., F. Napoletano, R. Vecchio, and E. Pomarici. 2014b. European wine exports: The key role of trade policy. EuroChoices 13 (3): 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merli, R., M. Preziosi, and A. Acampora. 2018. Sustainability experiences in the wine sector: Toward the development of an international indicators system. Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 3791–3805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morrison, A., and R. Rabellotti. 2017. Gradual catch up and enduring leadership in the global wine industry. Research Policy 46 (2): 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pomarici, E., R. Vecchio, and A. Mariani. 2015. Wineries’ perception of sustainability costs and benefits: An exploratory study in California. Sustainability 7 (12): 16164–16174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rickard, B.J., O. Gergaud, S.T. Ho, and F. Livat. 2017. Trade liberalization in the presence of domestic regulations: Public policies applied to EU and U.S. wine markets. Applied Economics 50 (18): 2028–2047.Google Scholar
  36. Rollo, J., I. Borchert, K. Dawar, P. Holmes, and L.A. Winters. 2016. The World Trade Organization: A safety net for a post-Brexit UK trade policy? Briefing paper 1. UKTPO, University of Sussex. Available at: http://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/uktpo/files/2017/01/Briefing-paper-1-final-1.pdf.
  37. UNCTAD. 2013. Non-tariff measures to trade: Economic and policy issues for developing countries for developing countries. Geneva.Google Scholar
  38. USTR (Office of the United States Trade Representative). 2017. Special 301 Report. Available at: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/41/US-TradeRepresentative-Seal.svg/1200px-US-TradeRepresentative-Seal.svg.png.
  39. ———. 2018. National trade estimate report on foreign trade barriers. Available at: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Reports/2018%20National%20Trade%20Estimate%20Report.pdf.
  40. Wehner, L. 2009. Power, governance, and ideas in Chile’s free trade agreement policy, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA). Working papers No 102.Google Scholar
  41. WFA (Winemakers’ Federation of Australia). 2010. Submission on the trans-pacific partnership agreement submission to DFAT.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2018. Trade and market access report.Google Scholar
  43. Wine Institute. 2013. International trade barriers report for U.S. wines – 2012.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2015. International trade barriers report for U.S. wines – 2015. Available at: https://members.wineinstitute.org/files/TB/CalWine.TradeBarriersReport2015.V07Web.pdf.
  45. WTO. 2010. The WTO agreements series – Sanitary and phytosanitary measures. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/agrmntseries4_sps_e.pdf.
  46. ———. 2014. The WTO agreements series – Technical barriers to trade. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/tbttotrade_e.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economic and Legal StudiesUniversity of Naples “Parthenope”NaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of PaduaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations