Powers of the Gun: Process and Possibility in Global Small Arms Control
Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) are the principal tools of armed violence, but the development of a global ‘regime’ has been a fragmented and fragile process that reinforces sovereignty more than it regulates violence. This article argues that rather than a settled regime, the global processes on SALW is better understood as a ‘global assemblage.’ Drawing on ‘new materialism’ and process philosophy, the chapter draws attention to the ways in which unity and diversity co-exist and co-constitute each other. Indeed, one of the key features of the SALW process has been the continuous production of both agreements and disagreements in which the meaning of consensus (as well as the specific commitments agreed) are shifting. The forms of power that constitute the regime are themselves produced as a global collective for action and particular modes of action on SALW are composed.
KeywordsSmall arms and light weapons Assemblage Disagreement Consensus Standardisation
- Batchelor, P., & McDonald, G. (2005). Too Close for Comfort: An Analysis of the UN Tracing Negotiations. Disarmament Forum, 4, 39–47.Google Scholar
- Bolton, J. R. (2001, July 9). U.S. Statement at Plenary Session Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs UN Conference on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects. http://www.fas.org/asmp/campaigns/smallarms/SAconf-USstmt.htm.
- Borrie, J. (2009). Unacceptable Harm: A History of How the Treaty to Ban Cluster Munitions Was Won. Geneva: UNIDIR.Google Scholar
- Borrie, J., & Thornton, A. (2008). The Value of Diversity in Multilateral Disarmament Work. Geneva: UNIDIR.Google Scholar
- Bourne, M., Godnick, B., Greene, O., Kirkham, E., Macalesher, J., Vivekananda, J., & Watson, C. (2006). Reviewing Action on Small Arms 2006: Assessing the First Five Years of the UN Programme of Action. London: Biting the Bullet and IANSA.Google Scholar
- Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Caughley, T. (2012). The Elusive Consensus. http://www.acronym.org.uk/articles-and-analyses/elusive-consensus.
- Collier, S. J., & Ong, A. (2005). Global Assemblages, Anthropological Problems. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (pp. 3–21). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II. Columbia: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Drezner, D. W. (2008). All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Eyal, G., & Pok, G. (2015). What Is Security Expertise? From the Sociology of Professions to the Analysis of Networks of Expertise. In T. V. Berling & C. Bueger (Eds.), Security Expertise: Practice, Power Responsibility (pp. 37–59). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Garcia, D. (2006). Small Arms and Security: New Emerging International Norms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Garcia, D. (2011). Disarmament Diplomacy and Human Security: Regimes, Norms and Moral Progress in International Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gomez Robledo, J. M., Amb. (2013, March 28). Statement by Amb: Juan Manuel Gomez Robledo, Head of Delegation of Mexico, Final UN Conference on the ATT. http://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/att/negotiating-conference-ii/statements/28March_Mexico.pdf.
- Goose, S., & Williams, J. (2004). The Campaign to Ban Antipersonnel Landmines: Potential Lessons. In R. A. Matthew, B. McDonald, & K. R. Rutherford (Eds.), Landmines and Human Security: International Politics and War’s Hidden Legacy (pp. 239–250). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Greene, O., & Marsh, N. (2012). Governance and Small Arms and Light Weapons. In O. Greene & N. Marsh (Eds.), Small Arms, Crime and Conflict: Global Governance and the Threat of Armed Violence (pp. 163–182). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Holtom, P., & Pavesi, I. (2017). Trade Update 2017: Out of the Shadows. Geneva: Small Arms Survey.Google Scholar
- Holtom, P., Pavesi, I., & Rigual, C. (2014). Trade Update. In G. McDonald, E. LeBrun, A. Alvazzi del Frate, E. G. Berman, & K. Krause (Eds.), Small Arms Survey 2014: Women and Guns (pp. 109–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hubert, D. (2000). The Landmine Ban: A Case Study in Humanitarian Advocacy. The Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies Occasional Paper #42. http://www.watsoninstitute.org/pub/op42.pdf.
- Karp, A. (2008). A Semi-automatic Process? Identifying and Destroying Military Surplus. In E. Berman, K. Krause, E. LeBrun, & G. McDonald (Eds.), Small Arms Survey 2008: Risk and Resilience (pp. 77–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Krause, K. (2001). Norm-Building in Security Spaces: The Emergence of the Light Weapons Problematic. http://www.academia.edu/2696290/Norm-building_in_security_spaces_The_emergence_of_the_light_weapons_problematic.
- Latour, B. (1986). The Powers of Association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Laurance, E. J. (2014). The Small Arms Problem as Arms Control: A Policy Driven Agenda. In P. Batchelor & K. M. Kenkel (Eds.), Controlling Small Arms: Consolidation, Innovation and Relevance in Research and Policy (pp. 13–35). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Macospol. (2007, November 5). Consortium Agreement Annex I, p. 6. Unpublished Document Submitted to the European Union.Google Scholar
- McLay, J. (2014). Beyond Stalemate: Advocacy and Action in the UN Small Arms Process. In P. Batchelor & K. M. Kenkel (Eds.), Controlling Small Arms: Consolidation, Innovation and Relevance in Research and Policy (pp. 286–301). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sears, N. A. (2012). Controlling Small Arms and Light Weapons Proliferation: The Potential of the Arms Trade Treaty. Patterson Review of International Affairs, 12, 35–60.Google Scholar
- Stavrianakis, A., & Yun, H. (2014). China and the Arms Trade Treaty. London: Saferworld.Google Scholar
- Tholens, S. (2013). Localization Strategies in Post-war Security Governance: Bringing in State-Society Narratives. Paper Presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, April 3–6, 2013. Cited with Permission.Google Scholar
- UN. (2013). Arms Trade Treaty Will Generate ‘Much-Needed Momentum’ for Other Global Disarmament, Non-proliferation Efforts, Secretary-General Says, UN Press Release SG/SM/14919-DC/3426; 2 April 2013. http://www.un.org/press/en/2013/sgsm14919.doc.htm. Accessed March 22, 2016.
- Whitehead, A. N. (1929/1978). Process and Reality: Corrected Edition. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Wisotzki, S. (2010). Between Morality and Military Interests: Norm Setting in Humanitarian Arms Control: PRIF Report No. 92. Frankfurt: Frankfurt Peace Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Wood, A. (2012, January 12). How to Reach Consensus on an Arms Trade Treaty. Arms Control Today. http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2012_01-02/How_to_Reach_Consensus_on_an_Arms_Trade_Treaty.