Advertisement

Digging for Gold: Motivating Users to Explore Alternative Search Interfaces

  • Angela FesslEmail author
  • Alfred Wertner
  • Viktoria Pammer-Schindler
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11082)

Abstract

In this demonstration paper, we describe a prototype that visualizes usage of different search interfaces on a single search platform with the goal to motivate users to explore alternative search interfaces. The underlying rationale is, that by now the one-line-input to search engines is so standard, that we can assume users’ search behavior to be operationalized. This means, that users may be reluctant to explore alternatives even though these may be suited better to their context of use/search task.

Keywords

Search user interface Search behavior Reflective learning Reflection guidance 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The project “MOVING - TraininG towards a society of data-saVvy inforMation prOfessionals to enable open leadership iNnovation” is funded under the Horizon 2020 of the European Commission (project number 693092). The Know-Center is funded within the Austrian COMET Program - Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies - under the auspices of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology, the Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth and by the State of Styria. COMET is managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG.

References

  1. 1.
    Aula, A., Nordhausen, K.: Modeling successful performance in web searching. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57, 1678–1693 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bateman, S., Teevan, J., White, R.W.: The search dashboard: how reflection and comparison impact search behavior. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1785–1794. ACM, May 2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D.: Promoting reflection in learning: a model. In: Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, pp. 18–40. Routledge Farmer, New York (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edwards, S.L., Bruce, C.S.: Reflective internet searching: an action research model. Learn. Organ. 9(4), 180–188 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fessl, A., Blunk, O., Prilla, M., Pammer, V.: The known universe of reflection guidance: a literature review. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 9(2–3), 103–125 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fessl, A., Wesiak, G., Rivera-Pelayo, V., Feyertag, S., Pammer, V.: In-app reflection guidance: lessons learned across four field trials at the workplace. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(4), 488–501 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fessl, A., Pammer, V., Wiese, M., Thalmann, S.: Improving search strategies of auditors – a focus group on reflection interventions. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology Enhanced Learning co-located with the 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B.A.: Acting with Technology. Activity Theory and Interaction Design. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malacria, S., Scarr, J., Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., Grossman, T.: Skillometers: reflective widgets that motivate and help users to improve performance. In: UIST 2013 Conference Proceedings: ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology, pp. 321–330 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moraveji, N., Morris, M.R., Morris, D., Czerwinski, M., Riche, N.: ClassSearch: facilitating the development of web search skills through social learning. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 1797–1806 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moraveji, N., Russell, D., Bien, J., Mease, D.: Measuring improvement in user search performance resulting from optimal search tips. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 355–363 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tucker, V.M.: The expert searcher’s experience of information. In: Bruce, C., Davis, K., Hughes, H., Partridge, H., Stoodley, I. (eds.) In: Information Experience: Approaches to Theory & Practice, pp. 239–255. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Fessl
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alfred Wertner
    • 1
  • Viktoria Pammer-Schindler
    • 2
  1. 1.Know-Center GmbHGrazAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Interactive Systems and Data ScienceGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations