The iPad in the Foundations Program of the Higher Colleges of Technology in Fujairah

  • Barraq Ali


This study explored the integration of the iPad as a learning and teaching technology into the Foundations Program of the two Higher Colleges of Technology—the men and women’s colleges—in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates. It also investigated the use of the iPad by the Program’s teachers and students to construct and promote English language teaching and learning in the Program and examines the challenges faced in doing so. Additionally, it shedded light on the limitations of the iPad and other relevant issues and stresses the importance of conducting a pilot scheme and longitudinal studies before the introduction of a new educational technology. The data for the study were drawn from class observations, interviews, surveys, and written questions.


iPad Foundation program Integration Technology Teaching Learning 


  1. Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? Association of Learning Technology Journal, 12(2), 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Falloon, G., & Melhuish, K. (2010). Looking to the future: M-learning with the iPad. Computers in New Zealand Schools: Learning, Leading, Technology, 33(3), 1–2.Google Scholar
  3. Gaudet, G. (2013). Using mobile technologies in French immersion classrooms: Enriching second language acquisition (n.d). Airdrie. Retrieved from
  4. Gerring, J. (2006). Case study research: Principles & practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibson, E. J. (1997). An ecological psychologist’s prolegomena for perceptual development: A functional approach. In C. Dent-Read & P. Zukow-Goldring (Eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism-environment systems (pp. 23–45). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ireland, G. V., & Woollerton, M. (2010). The impact of the iPad and iPhone on education. Journal of Bunkyo Gakuin University Department of Foreign Languages and Bunkyo Gakuin Colllege, 10, 31–48.Google Scholar
  7. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milard, M., Arnedillo-Sanches, I., & Vavoula, G. (2011). The genesis and development of mobile learning in Europe. In D. Parsons (Ed.), Combining e-learning and m-learning: New applications of blended educational resources (pp. 151–177). IGI Global.Google Scholar
  9. Lee, M. J. W. (2009). How can 3D virtual worlds be used to support collaborative learning? An analysis of cases from the literature. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 5(1), 149–158.Google Scholar
  10. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, nigital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Price, C. (2010). Why don’t my students think I’m groovy? The new “R”s for engaging millenial learners. Essays from E-xcellence in Teaching, 9, 29–34.Google Scholar
  12. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. Proceedings of mLearn, 2007. Retrieved from
  13. Sim, S., & Van Loon, B. (2014). Introducting critical theory: A graphic guide. Icon Books. Retrieved from
  14. Ting, R. (2005). Mobile learning: Current and future challenges. Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference (pp. 603–607).
  15. Traxler, J. (2005). Defining Mobile Learning. Proceedings IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning (pp. 261–266), Malta.Google Scholar
  16. Webb, M. E., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information & communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 13(3), 235–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barraq Ali
    • 1
  1. 1.Higher Colleges of TechnologyFujairahUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations