Advertisement

Understanding English Speaking Difficulties: Implications for the English Language Curriculum for the Arab Students in a Pakistani University

  • Musharraf Aziz
Chapter

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the difficulties and their causes, with oral English skills of the Arab students at a leading international university in the South Punjab, Pakistan. To achieve the objectives, the study, using structured questionnaire and semi-structured (semi-standardized) interviews, addressed to the issue and reported the results indicating the relevant problem areas. The quantitative analysis of the data was performed through a one-sample t-test using SPSS version 21, whereas the qualitative analysis of the data acquired from the interviews was accomplished through open-coding and thematic analyses. The deficient oral English academic background, insufficient oral English activities in the current English language curriculum, lack of language classroom plans that provide opportunities to speak English, lack of proficient English language teachers and absence of foundation courses in English at the start of the educational programmes are found to be responsible for the oral English difficulties that these learners are currently facing. The results lead us to question the oral English curriculum for these Arab students and a lack of focus in taking the relevant remedial measures.

Keywords

English speaking difficulties Arab students Tertiary level education Low competence in spoken English 

References

  1. Ahmad, J., & Muhiburrahman, M. (2013). Teachers’ perspectives on errors in English consonant sounds by Saudi EFL learners. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 150–163.Google Scholar
  2. Al Daimi, K. J., & Abdel-Amir, M. A. (1994). The syntactic analysis of Arabic by machine. Computers and the Humanities, 28(1), 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alduais, A. M. S. (2012). Simple sentence structure of standard Arabic language and standard English language: A contrastive study. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(4), 500–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bensoussan, M., & Laufer, B. (1984). Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 7(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berber, S. A. (1997). Proficiency and comprehension of television news in a foreign language. Revista de Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada (DELTA), 13(2), 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briggs, T., Ololube, N. P., & Kpolovie, P. J. (2014). Managing children learning: Support-based screening procedure for motor, cognition and language communication in early childhood education. International Journal of Management in Education, 8(2), 168–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, H. D. (1973). Affective variables in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 23(2), 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, H. D. (1980). The optimal distance model of second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 4(2)157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cauldwell, R., & Hewings, M. (1996). Intonation rules in ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, 50(4), 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corder, S. P. (1975). Applied linguistics and language teaching. Papers in applied linguistics, 2, 1–15.Google Scholar
  12. Crystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction—A growing global phenomenon. British Council. http://www.Britishcouncil.org/education/ihe/knowledge-centre/english-language-higher-education/report-english-medium-instruction. Accessed 2 2 2016.
  15. Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(03), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doughty, C. J. (2008). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2012). Management research. Los Angeles and London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (2004). Management research: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao, M., & Liu, Q. (2012). Effective teacher attributes: A comparison of American and Chinese secondary teacher candidates’ perceptions. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 16(2), 85–95.Google Scholar
  22. Gomez, L., & Karatzas, D. (2016, April). A fine-grained approach to scene text script identification. In Document Analysis Systems (DAS), 2016 12th IAPR Workshop on (pp. 192–197). IEEE.Google Scholar
  23. Hajar, A. (2015). ‘Significant others’ in influencing Arab EFL learners’ learning strategy use and development: A qualitative study. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 6(3), 257–270.Google Scholar
  24. Hamad, M., & Hussain, M. (2011). Arabic text-to-speech synthesizer. In Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOR&D) (pp. 409–414). IEEE.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffman, C. (2001). Towards a description of trilingual competence. International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Javed, F. (2013). Arabic and English phonetics: A comparative study. The Criterion: An International Journal in English, 4(4). Retrieved from www.the-criterion.com.
  28. Kadasah, N. (2000). ISO 9000 implementation in a range of manufacturing sectors in Saudi Arabia, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling, UK.Google Scholar
  29. Laufer, B. (2009). Why are some words more difficult than others?—Some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words. IRAL—International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 28(4), 293–308.Google Scholar
  30. Litwin, M. S. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity (Vol. 7). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Lotbinière, M. D. (2011, November 8). South Korean parents told: Pre-school English ‘harmful.’ The Guardian Weekly. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com.
  32. Macaro, E. (2015). English medium instruction: Time to start asking some difficult questions. Modern English Teacher, 24(2), 4–7.Google Scholar
  33. McCardle, P., & Hoff, E. (2006). Childhood bilingualism: Research on infancy through school age. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norton, B. (2000). Investment, acculturation, and language loss. In S. L. McKay & S.-L. C. Wong (Eds.), New immigrants in the United States (pp. 443–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Omeri, A., Malcolm, P., Ahern, M., & Wellington, B. (2003). Meeting the challenges of cultural diversity in the academic setting. Nurse Education in Practice, 3(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Price, M. L. (1991). The subjective experience of foreign language anxiety: Interview with highly anxious students. In E. K. Horwitz & D. J. Young (Eds.), Language anxiety: From theory and research to classroom implications (pp. 101–108). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1) 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saigh, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Difficulties with vocabulary word form: The case of Arabic ESL learners. System, 40(1), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  41. Songsangkaew, P. (2003). The language function difficulties experienced by Thai students in real situations in America. Unpublished master’s thesis, Faculty of English of Applied Arts, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology North Bangkok, BKK, Thailand.Google Scholar
  42. Walker, P. (2014). International student policies in UK higher education from colonialism to the coalition: Developments and consequences. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(4), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC Journal, 37(3), 308–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang, B., & Clum, G. A. (1994). Life stress, social support, and problem-solving skills predictive of depressive symptoms, hopelessness, and suicide ideation in an Asian student population: A test of a model. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 24(2), 127–139.Google Scholar
  45. Hidri, S. (2018b). Introduction: State of the art of assessing second language abilities. In S. Hidri (Ed.), Revisiting the assessment of second language abilities: From theory to practice (pp. 1–19). Basel: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Hidri, S. (2018c). Assessing spoken language ability: A many-Facet Rasch analysis. In S. Hidri (Ed.), Revisiting the assessment of second language abilities: From theory to practice (pp. 23–48). Basel: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Musharraf Aziz
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LahoreLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations