Advertisement

Attending to Nonhuman Animals in Pedagogical Relationships and Encounters

  • Joshua RussellEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment book series (PSEE)

Abstract

This chapter examines existing literatures that describe nonhuman animals as educators or as pedagogical agents in non-formal and formal educational contexts. Agency and subjectivity have long been denied to nonhuman organisms, and this chapter explores the pedagogical possibilities and limitations of intersubjective encounters and relationships between humans and other animals. The author asks questions that draw on ethological research, educational philosophy, and critical pedagogies. What does it mean to suggest that animals are educators? To what extent do nonhuman animals enact the volition, tact, or intentionality that we might require of them in educational endeavors? This chapter addresses those questions by highlighting the interspecies, pedagogical relationship as the core unit of focus, outlining the importance of reflexivity and attunement to all actors within the educational context, including humans/nonhumans and teachers/students alike.

References

  1. AZA. (2017). CEC ambassador animal position statement. Webpage. Retrieved from https://www.aza.org/cec-ambassador-animal-position-statement
  2. Balcombe, J. (2001). Dissection: The scientific case for alternatives. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 4(2), 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, M. J. (2011). Doing animist research in academia: A methodological framework. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 123–141.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, J. (1980). About looking. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  5. Blenkinsop, S., & Piersol, L. (2013). Listening to the literal: Orientations towards how nature communicates. Phenomenology & Practice, 7(2), 41–60.Google Scholar
  6. Bone, J. (2013). The animal as fourth educator: A literature review of animals and young children in pedagogical relationships. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(2), 57.Google Scholar
  7. Braverman, I. (2011). Looking at zoos. Cultural Studies, 25(6), 809–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castricano, J. (Ed.). (2008). Animal subjects: An ethical reader in a posthuman world. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cheney, J., & Weston, A. (1999). Environmental ethics as environmental etiquette: Toward an ethics-based epistemology. Environmental Ethics, 21(2), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daly, B., & Suggs, S. (2010). Teachers’ experiences with humane education and animals in the elementary classroom: Implications for empathy development. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Waal, F. B. (1999). Anthropomorphism and anthropodenial: Consistency in our thinking about humans and other animals. Philosophical Topics, 27(1), 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derrida, J. (2002). The animal that therefore I am (more to follow) (D. Willis, trans.). Critical Inquiry, 28(2), 369–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (2004). My pedagogic creed. In D. Finders & S. Thornton (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (3rd ed., pp. 17–24). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  14. Evernden, L. L. N. (1993). The natural alien: Humankind and environment. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fawcett, L. (2005). Bioregional teaching: How to climb, eat, fall, and learn from porcupines. In P. Tripp & L. Muzzin (Eds.), Teaching as activism: Equity meets environmentalism. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, R. (2006). Animal behaviours, post-human lives: Everyday negotiations of the animal–human divide in pet-keeping. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(4), 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fudge, E. (2004). Animal. London, UK: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  18. Gee, N., Fine, A., & McCardle, P. (Eds.). (2017). How animals help students learn: Research and practice for educators and mental-health professionals. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Greenhough, B., & Roe, E. (2011). Ethics, space, and somatic sensibilities: Comparing relationships between scientific researchers and their human and animal experimental subjects. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(1), 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  21. Herbert, S., & Lynch, J. (2017). Classroom animals provide more than just science education. Science & Education, 26(1–2), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hug, B. (2005). Dissection reconsidered: A reaction to de Villiers and Monk’s ‘The first cut is the deepest’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 601–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hug, B. (2008). Re-examining the practice of dissection: What does it teach? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen, E. (2014). Evaluating children’s conservation biology learning at the zoo. Conservation Biology, 28(4), 1004–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keulartz, J. (2015). Captivity for conservation? Zoos at a crossroads. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(2), 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lloro-Bidart, T. (2014). They call them “good luck polka dots”: Disciplining bodies, bird biopower, and human-animal relationships at the Aquarium of the Pacific. Journal of Political Ecology, 21(2104), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lowan-Trudeau, G. (2012). Methodological métissage: An interpretive Indige-nous approach to environmental education research. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 17, 113–120.Google Scholar
  28. MacNamara, M., & MacLean, E. (2017). Selecting animals for education environments. In N. Gee, A. Fine, & P. McCardle (Eds.), How animals help students learn: Research and practice for educators and mental-health professionals. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Manfredo, M. J. (2008). Who cares about wildlife? Social science concepts for exploring human-wildlife relationships and conservation issues. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Meadan, H., & Jegatheesan, B. (2010). Classroom pets and young children. Young Children, 65(3), 70.Google Scholar
  31. Myers, O. G. (2007). The significance of children and animals: Social development and our connections to other species (2nd ed.). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  32. New York Department of Environmental Conservation. (2017). Today’s hunter (New York): A guide to hunting responsibly and safely. Dallas, TX: Kilkomey.Google Scholar
  33. Oakley, J. (2012a). Dissection and choice in the science classroom: Student experiences, teacher responses, and a critical analysis of the right to refuse. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oakley, J. (2012b). Science teachers and the dissection debate: Perspectives on animal dissection and alternatives. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(2), 253–267.Google Scholar
  35. Oakley, J., Watson, G. P., Russell, C. L., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Fawcett, L., Kuhl, G., … Warkentin, T. (2011). Animal encounters in environmental education research: Responding to the “question of the animal”. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 15, 86–102.Google Scholar
  36. Pontius, J. B., Greenwood, D. A., Ryan, J. L., & Greenwood, E. A. (2014). Hunting for ecological learning. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 80–95.Google Scholar
  37. Povey, K. D., & Rios, J. (2002). Using interpretive animals to deliver affective messages in zoos. Journal of Interpretation Research, 7(2), 19–28.Google Scholar
  38. Roy, K. (2011). Animals in the classroom. Science Scope, 34(6), 92–93.Google Scholar
  39. Russell, J. (2017). “Everything has to die one day”: Children’s explorations of the meanings of death in human-animal-nature relationships. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sattler, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). Short-and long-term outreach at the zoo: Cognitive learning about marine ecological and conservational issues. Environmental Education Research, 23(2), 252–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sauvé, L. (2009). Being here together. In M. McKenzie, P. Hart, H. Bai, & B. Jickling (Eds.), Fields of green: Restorying culture, environment, and education. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Sherwood, K. P., Rallis, S. F., & Stone, J. (1989). Effects of live animals vs. preserved specimens on student learning. Zoo Biology, 8(1), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simpson, L. (2002). Indigenous environmental education for cultural survival. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 13–25.Google Scholar
  44. Spannring, R. (2017). Animals in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Steward, H. (2009). Animal agency. Inquiry, 52(3), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor, A., & Giugni, M. (2012). Common worlds: Reconceptualising inclusion in early childhood communities. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Todd, S. (2014). Between body and spirit: The liminality of pedagogical relationships. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(2), 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. von Uexküll, J. (2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and men: With a theory of meaning (J. O’Neill, trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  49. Warkentin, T. (2010). Interspecies etiquette: An ethics of paying attention to animals. Ethics & the Environment, 15(1), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zimmermann, A. (2010). The role of zoos in contributing to in situ conservation. In D. Kleiman, K. Thompson, & C. Baer (Eds.), Wild mammals in captivity: Principles and techniques for zoo management (pp. 281–287). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Animal Behavior, Ecology, & Conservation and AnthrozoologyCanisius CollegeBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations