Advertisement

Significant Life Experiences and Animal-Themed Education

  • Susan Caplow
  • Jennifer Thomsen
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment book series (PSEE)

Abstract

Significant life experiences (SLE) literature posits that people have important experiences that lead them toward certain outcomes and support a cohesive life narrative. This SLE framework has been used to identify the development of environmental values and behaviors. Our research explores how SLE influences animal-themed educators in their choice to work in this field. We find that animal-themed educators share some unifying experiences with more general environmentalist populations, but that animal-related experiences may indeed represent a somewhat unique pathway to these positions. Our work contributes to a greater understanding of environmental educators’ decisions and how SLEs influence their roles and identities as educators. The findings support pedagogical design of environmental education programs that strengthen the linkages between information, emotional connections, pro-environmental behaviors, and career opportunities.

References

  1. Archer, D., & Wearing, S. (2003). Self, space, and interpretive experience: The interactionism of environmental interpretation. Journal of Interpretation Research, 8(1), 7–23.Google Scholar
  2. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2005). Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behaviour through freechoice learning experiences: What is the state of the game? Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bixler, R. D., James, J. J., & Vadala, C. E. (2011). Environmental socialization incidents with implications for the expanded role of interpretive naturalists in providing natural history experiences. Journal of Interpretation Research, 16(1), 35–64.Google Scholar
  4. Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cachelin, A., Paisley, K., & Blanchard, A. (2008). Using the significant life experiences framework to inform program evaluation: The nature Conservancy’s Wings & Water Wetlands Education Program. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caplow, S. (2014). The communication of values, beliefs, and norms in live animal interpretive experiences: A comparative case study. Doctoral dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  7. Chawla, L. (1998a). Research methods to investigate significant life experiences: Review and recommendations. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chawla, L. (1998b). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research. Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chawla, L. (2001). Significant life experiences revisited once again: Response to vol. 5(4) ‘Five critical commentaries on significant life experience research in environmental education’. Environmental Education Research, 7(4), 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clayton, S., & Myers, G. (2009). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Devine-Wright, P., & Howes, Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraser, J., Clayton, S., Sickler, J., & Taylor, A. (2009). Belonging at the zoo: Retired volunteers, conservation activism and collective identity. Ageing and Society, 29(3), 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goralnik, L., & Nelson, M. (2015). Empathy and agency in the Isle Royale field philosophy experience. Journal of Sustainability Education, 10. Retrieved from http://www.susted.com/wordpress/content/empathy-and-agency-in-the-isle-royale-field-philosophy-experience_2015_12/
  16. Groff, A., Lockhart, D., Ogden, J., & Dierking, L. (2005). An exploratory investigation of the effect of working in an environmentally themed facility on the conservation-related knowledge, attitudes and behavior of staff. Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halpenny, E. A. (2010). Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ham, S. H., & Weiler, B. (2002). Interpretation as the centerpiece of sustainable wildlife tourism. In R. Harris, T. Griffin, & P. Williams (Eds.), Sustainable tourism: A global perspective (pp. 35–44). London, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howell, R. A., & Allen, S. (2016). Significant life experiences, motivations and values of climate change educators. Environmental Education Research, 1–19. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1158242.
  20. Hsu, S. J. (2009). Significant life experiences affect environmental action: A confirmation study in Eastern Taiwan. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 497–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes, K. (2013). Measuring the impact of viewing wildlife: Do positive intentions equate to long-term changes in conservation behaviour? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(1), 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. James, K. (1993). A qualitative study of factors influencing racial diversity in environmental education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  23. Kelsey, E. (2016). Propagating collective hope in the midst of environmental doom and gloom. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 23–40.Google Scholar
  24. Kudryavtsev, A., Stedman, R. C., & Krasny, M. E. (2012). Sense of place in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, J. E. (2007). The significant life experiences (SLEs) of humane educators. Society & Animals, 15(3), 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lloro-Bidart, T. (2017). A feminist posthumanist political ecology of education for theorizing human-animal relations/relationships. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Myers, O. E., & Saunders, C. D. (2003). Animals as links to developing caring relationships with the natural world. In P. H. J. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultrual and evolutionary investigations (pp. 153–178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Myers, O. E., Saunders, C. D., & Bexell, S. M. (2009). Fostering empathy with wildlife: Factors affecting free-choice learning for conservation concern and behavior. In J. H. Falk, J. Heimlich, & S. Foutz (Eds.), Free-choice learning and the environment (pp. 39–56). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ogden, J., & Heimlich, J. E. (2009). Why focus on zoo and aquarium education? Zoo Biology, 28(5), 357–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmer, J. A., & Suggate, J. (1996). Influences and experiences affecting the pro-environmental behaviour of educators. Environmental Education Research, 2(1), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterson, N. J. (1982). Developmental variables affecting environmental sensitivity in professional environmental educators. Unpublished master’s thesis. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Carbondale, IL.Google Scholar
  35. Russell, C., & Oakley, J. (2016). Editorial: Engaging the emotional dimensions of environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 13–22.Google Scholar
  36. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Shani, A., & Pizam, A. (2010). The role of animal-based attractions in ecological sustainability: Current issues and controversies. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 2(3), 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skibins, J., Powell, R., & Hallo, J. (2016). Lucky 13: Conservation implications of broadening “Big 5” flagship species recognition in East Africa. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(7), 1024–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skibins, J. C., & Powell, R. B. (2013). Conservation caring: Measuring the influence of zoo visitors’ connection to wildlife on pro-conservation behaviors. Zoo Biology, 32(5), 528–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skibins, J. C., & Sharp, R. L. (2017). Evaluation of the brown bear viewing experience at Katmai National Park and Preserve: Implications for management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22(5), 476–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stern, M. J., Powell, R. B., & Hill, D. (2014). Environmental education program evaluation in the new millennium: What do we measure and what have we learned? Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 581–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Carrier, S. J., Strnad, R. L., Bondell, H. D., Kirby-Hathaway, T., & Moore, S. E. (2014). Role of significant life experiences in building environmental knowledge and behavior among middle school students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(3), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Takahashi, B., & Selfa, T. (2015). Predictors of pro-environmental behavior in rural American communities. Environment and Behavior, 47(8), 856–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanner, T. (1980). Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tanner, T. (1998). Choosing the right subjects in significant life experiences research. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), 399–417.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462980040404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tonge, J., Ryan, M. M., Moore, S. A., & Beckley, L. E. (2015). The effect of place attachment on pro-environment behavioral intentions of visitors to coastal natural area tourist destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 54(6), 730–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Torkar, G. (2014). Learning experiences that produce environmentally active and informed minds. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 69, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. UNESCO-UNEP. (1978). The Tbilisi declaration: Final report intergovernmental conference on environmental education. Organized by UNESCO in cooperation with UNEP, Tbilisi, USSR, 14–26 October 1977, Paris, France: UNESCO ED/MD/49.Google Scholar
  49. Vining, J. (2003). The connection to other animals and caring for nature. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 87–99.Google Scholar
  50. Wartenkin, T. (2011). Cultivating urban naturalists: Teaching experiential, place-based learning through nature journaling in Central Park. Journal of Geography, 110(6), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Webb, R. C. (2000). The nature, role, and measurement of affect. Journal of Interpretation Research, 5(2), 15–30.Google Scholar
  52. Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, C. C., & Chawla, L. (2016). Environmental identity formation in nonformal environmental education programs. Environmental Education Research, 22(7), 978–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral and Social SciencesUniversity of MontevalloMontevalloUSA
  2. 2.Department of Society and ConservationUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations