Advertisement

Coexisting Entities in Multispecies Worlds: Arts-Based Methodologies for Decolonial Pedagogies

  • Leesa FawcettEmail author
  • Morgan Johnson
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment book series (PSEE)

Abstract

We ask in this chapter how students’ purposeful, imaginative belonging to their multispecies worlds can be nurtured as a starting point for creative resistance to dominant anthropocentric pedagogies. We explore how environmental education and ethics can resist reproducing colonizing, instrumental relations to coexisting entities. Our theoretical framework ranges across the intersections of experiential environmental education, Indigenous pedagogies (specifically Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee), critical animal studies, and phenomenological perspectives. We are motivated by intersectional analyses examining the links between oppressions and are encouraged by interdisciplinary collaboration, experiential understanding, and the explicit linking of theories to praxis as illuminated in critical animal studies. Methodologically, the chapter draws on arts-based praxis as a way to disrupt and reimagine narratives of justice and multispecies pedagogies.

References

  1. Adams, C. (2014). The war on compassion. In J. Sorenson (Ed.), Critical animal studies: Thinking the unthinkable (pp. 18–28). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arquette, M. (1999). The animals. In Haudenosaunee Environmental Task Force (Ed.), Words that come before all else: Environmental philosophies of the Haudenosaunee (pp. 82–101). Roseveltown, NY: Native North American Travelling College.Google Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Belcourt, B. R. (2014). Animal bodies, colonial subjects: (Re)locating animality in decolonial thought. Societies, 5(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  5. Benton-Banai, E. (2004). Creation: From the Ojibwa. In The Mishomis book: The voice of the Ojibway. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bisgould, L. (2011). Animals and the law. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law.Google Scholar
  7. Cajete, G. (2004). Philosophy of native science. In A. Waters (Ed.), American Indian thought (pp. 45–57). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Chang, C. (2017). Global animal capital and animal garbage: Documentary redemption and hope. Journal of Chinese Cinemas, 11(1), 96–114.Google Scholar
  9. Chaudhuri, U. (2014). Animal acts for changing times, 2.0: A field guide to interspecies performance. In U. Chaudhuri & H. Hughes (Eds.), Animal acts: Performing species today (pp. 1–12). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  10. Corman, L., & Vandrovcová, T. (2014). Radical humility: Toward a more holistic critical animal studies pedagogy. In A. Nocella II, J. Sorenson, K. Socha, & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Defining critical animal studies: An introduction to an intersectional social justice approach to animal liberation (pp. 135–157). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Coulthard, G. S. (2014). Red skin, white masks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 139–167.Google Scholar
  13. De Waal, F. (2016). Are we smart enough to know how smart other animals are. New York, NY: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  14. Deckha, M. (2012). Toward a postcolonial, posthumanist feminist theory: Centralizing race and culture in feminist work on nonhuman animals. Hypatia, 27(3), 527–545.Google Scholar
  15. Fawcett, L. (2000). Ethical imagining: Ecofeminist possibilities and environmental learning. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5(1), 134–149.Google Scholar
  16. Fawcett, L. (2013). Three degrees of separation: Accounting for naturecultures in environmental education research. In R. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 409–417). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Gaard, G. (2011). Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism. Feminist Formations, 23(2), 26–53 Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gehl, L. (2011). Ally bill of responsibilities. Canadian Dimensions, 45(1), 12.Google Scholar
  19. Gough, A., & Whitehouse, H. (2017). New vintages and new bottles: The “nature” of environmental education from new material feminist and ecofeminist viewpoints. Journal of Environmental Education49(4), 336–349. Google Scholar
  20. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Eds. and trans: Hoare, Q. & Novell Smith, G.). New York, NY: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Greene, M. (2000). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Haraway, D. J. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jonas, H. (1966). The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kahn, R. (2011). For a multi-armed love: Ecopedagogy for a posthuman age. In C. S. Malott & B. Porfilio (Eds.), Critical pedagogy in the twenty-first century: A new generation of scholars (pp. 109–131). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. King, T. (2003). The truth about stories. Toronto, ON: House of Anansi Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–476.Google Scholar
  28. Korteweg, L., & Oakley, J. (2014). Eco-heroes out of place and relations: Decolonizing the narratives of into the Wild and Grizzly Man through land education. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 131–143.Google Scholar
  29. Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations and contexts. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kymlicka, W., & Donaldson, S. (2015). Animal rights and aboriginal rights. In V. Black, P. Sankoff, & K. Sykes (Eds.), Canadian perspectives on animals and the law (pp. 159–186). Toronto, ON: Irwin Law.Google Scholar
  31. Lecoq, J. (2001). The moving body: Teaching creative theatre. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Lloro-Bidart, T. (2015). A political ecology of education in/for the Anthropocene. Environment & Society: Advances in Research, 6, 128–148.Google Scholar
  33. Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018). A feminist posthumanist ecopedagogy in/for/with animalscapes. Journal of Environmental Education, 49(2), 152–163.Google Scholar
  34. Lloro-Bidart, T., & Finewood, M. (2018). Looking outward and inward: What feminist theory offers the environmental studies and sciences. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8(2), 141–152.Google Scholar
  35. Maina-Okori, N. M., Koushik, J. R., & Wilson, A. (2018). Reimagining intersectionality in environmental and sustainability education: A critical literature review. Journal of Environmental Education49(4), 286–296. Google Scholar
  36. Martusewicz, R., Edmundson, J., & Lupinacci, J. (2011). Ecojustice education: Towards diverse, democratic and sustainable communities. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. McGregor, D. (2009). Honouring our relations: An Anishnaabe perspective on environmental justice. In J. Agyeman, P. Cole, R. Haluza-Delay, & P. O’Riley (Eds.), Speaking for ourselves: Environmental justice in Canada (pp. 27–41). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  38. McKenzie, M., Russell, C., Fawcett, L., & Timmerman, N. (2010). Popular media, intersubjective learning, and cultural production. In R. Stevenson & J. Dillon (Eds.), Environmental education: Learning, culture and agency (pp. 147–164). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
  39. Menzies, C. R. (2013). Standing on the shore with Saaban: An anthropological rapprochement with an Indigenous intellectual tradition. Collaborative Anthropologies, 6(1), 171–199.Google Scholar
  40. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris, France: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  41. Meyer, M. A. (2008). Indigenous and authentic: Hawaiian epistemology and the triangulation of meaning. In N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln, & L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 217–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Mumford, C. (2016). Le(e/a)ks: Being Anishinaabekwe on the land is political. English Journal, 106(1), 31–37.Google Scholar
  43. Newman, L. (2015). The effects of The Cove and Bold Native on audience attitudes towards animals. Animal Studies Journal, 4(1), 77–98.Google Scholar
  44. Nielsen, J., Hedeholm, R. B., Heinemeier, J., Bushnell, P. G., Christiansen, J. S., Olsen, J., … Steffensen, J. F. (2016). Eye lens radiocarbon reveals centuries of longevity in the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus). Science, 353(6300), 702–704.Google Scholar
  45. Nxumalo, F., & Cedillo, S. (2017). Decolonizing “place” in early childhood studies: Thinking with Indigenous onto-epistemologies and Black feminist geographies. Global Studies of Childhood, 7(2), 99–112.Google Scholar
  46. Piersol, L., & Timmerman, N. (2017). Reimagining environmental education within academia: Storytelling and dialogue as lived ecofeminist politics. Journal of Environmental Education, 48(1), 10–17.Google Scholar
  47. Plumwood, V. (2002). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Povinelli, E. A. (2016). Geontologies: A requiem to late liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Russell, C., & Bell, A. (1996). A politicized ethic of care: Environmental education from an ecofeminist perspective. In K. Warren (Ed.), Women’s voices in experiential education (pp. 172–181). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.Google Scholar
  50. Russell, C., & Oakley, J. (2016). Engaging the emotional dimensions of environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 13–22.Google Scholar
  51. Russell, C., & Semenko, K. (2016). We take “cow” as a compliment: Fattening humane, environmental, and social justice education. In E. Cameron & C. Russell (Eds.), The fat pedagogy reader: Challenging weight-based oppression through critical education (pp. 211–220). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  52. Salmón, E. (2013). Kincentric ecology: Indigenous perceptions of the human-nature relationship. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1327–1332.Google Scholar
  53. Shukin, N. (2009). Animal capital: Rendering life in biopolitical times. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  54. Simpson, L. (2008). Looking after Gdoo-naaganinaa: Precolonial Nishnaabeg diplomatic and treaty relationships. Wicazo Sa Review, 23(2), 29–42.Google Scholar
  55. Simpson, L. (2013). Leaks. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), 131–132.Google Scholar
  56. Simpson, L. B. (2014). Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), 1–25.Google Scholar
  57. Simpson, L. B. (2016). Dancing on our Turtle’s Back: Stories of Nishnaabeg re-creation, resurgence and a new emergence. Winnipeg, MB: Arbeiter Ring Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). What we have learned: Principles of Truth and Reconciliation. Winnipeg, MB: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/File/2015/Findings/Principles_2015_05_31_web_o.pdf
  59. Von Uexküll, J. (1992). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica, 89(4), 319–391.Google Scholar
  60. Warkentin, T. (2011). Interspecies etiquette in place: Ethical affordances in swim-with-dolphins programs. Ethics & the Environment, 16(1), 99–122.Google Scholar
  61. Whitehead, H., & Rendell, L. (2014). The cultural lives of whales and dolphins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wilson, S. (2008). Research as ceremony. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Environmental StudiesYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations