Advertisement

Ageing-in-Place for Low-Income Seniors: Living at the Intersection of Multiple Identities, Positionalities, and Oppressions

  • Judith SixsmithEmail author
  • Mei Lan Fang
  • Ryan Woolrych
  • Sarah Canham
  • Lupin Battersby
  • Tori Hui Ren
  • Andrew Sixsmith
Chapter
Part of the The Politics of Intersectionality book series (POLI)

Abstract

Ageing-in-place refers to the ability to live in one’s own home and community safely, independently, and comfortably regardless of age, income, or ability level. Often, ageing-in-place is assumed to be a positive experience; however, home is not always a positive place and can be perceived as prison-like or a burdensome environment. For older, ethno-cultural groups in Canada, acquiring adequate, comfortable housing is a challenge, especially when living with limited financial resources and lacking social and cultural capital. Using a community-based participatory research approach and a Multidimensional Intersectionality Framework, this chapter problematizes dominant, positive ageing-in-place policy discourses and provides experiential data to inform place-based policy directives for enabling older people to age well at home and in the right place. Policy implications of this work include further developing current understandings of sense-of-place that emphasize community participation, wellbeing, and nuanced experiences of older people.

References

  1. Adam, B. D. (1978). The Survival of Domination: Inferiorization in Everyday Life. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, A. (2007). On the Social Relations of Contract Research Production: Power, Positionality and Epistemology in Housing and Urban Research. Housing Studies, 20(6), 989–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The Relational Self: An Interpersonal Social-Cognitive Theory. Psychological Review, 109(4), 619–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrew, C., Graham, K., & Phillips, J. (2003). Urban Affairs: Back on the Policy Agenda. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Anthias, F. (2012). Hierarchies of Social Location, Class and Intersectionality: Towards a Translocational Frame. International Sociology, 28(1), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An Organizing Framework for Collective Identity: Articulation and Significance of Multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayalon, L., & Green, V. (2013). Social Ties in the Context of the Continuing Care Retirement Community. Qualitative Health Research, 23(3), 396–406.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312468506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barton, H., & Tsourou, C. (2000). A WHO Guide to Planning for People. London: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bergman, H., Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J., Hogan, D. B., Hummel, S., Karunananthan, S., & Wolfson, C. (2007). Frailty: An Emerging Research and Clinical Paradigm—Issues and Controversies. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 62(7), 731–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biggs, S., & Helm, L. B. (2007). The Practice of American Public Policymaking. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Bjornsdottir, K., Ceci, C., & Purkis, M. E. (2015). The ‘Right’ Place to Care for Older People: Home or Institution? Nursing Inquiry, 22(1), 64–73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brah, A., & Phoenix, A. (2004). Ain’t I a Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(3), 75–86.Google Scholar
  13. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Carter, T. (2005). The Influence of Immigration on Global City Housing Markets: The Canadian Perspective. Urban Policy and Research, 23(3), 256–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). “Healthy Places Terminology.” Accessed November 30.Google Scholar
  17. Clapham, D. (2002). Housing Pathways: A Post-Modern Analytical Framework. Housing, Theory and Society, 19(2), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the Outsider within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Crenshaw, K. (1995). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence against Women of Colour. In K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Informed the Movement (pp. 357–383). New York: New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Deaux, K., & Martin, D. (2003). Interpersonal Networks and Social Categories: Specifying Levels of Context in Identity Processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2), 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and Social Identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fullilove, M. T., & Wallace, R. (2011). Serial Forced Displacement in American Cities. Journal of Urban Health, 88(3), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the Framework Method for the Analysis of Qualitative Data in Multi-Disciplinary Health Research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 117.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Golant, S. (2015). Aging in the Right Place. Towson: Health Professions Press.Google Scholar
  26. Greenfield, E. A., Oberlink, M., Scharlach, A. E., Neal, M. B., & Stafford, P. B. (2015). Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Conceptual Issues and Key Questions. Gerontologist, 55(2), 191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guinier, L., & Torres, G. (2003). The Miner’s Canary: Enlisting Race, Resisting Power, Transforming Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hankivsky, O. (2014). Intersectionality 101. Vancouver, BC: The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  29. Hankivsky, O., & Cormier, R. (2011). Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanna, F. J., Talley, W. B., & Guindon, M. H. (2000). The Power of Perception: Toward a Model of Cultural Oppression and Liberation. Journal of Counseling and Development, 78, 430–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harvey, D. (2005). The Right to the City. In J. Lin & C. Mele (Eds.), The Urban Sociology Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hooks, b. (2000). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center (2nd ed.). Brooklyn: South End Press.Google Scholar
  33. Howarth, G. (1998). ‘Just Live for Today’. Living, Caring, Ageing and Dying. Ageing & Society, 18(6), 673–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hrybyk, R., Rubinstein, R. L., Eckert, J. K., Frankowski, A. C., Keimig, L., Nemec, M., Roth, E., & Doyle, P. J. (2012). The Dark Side: Stigma in Purpose-Built Senior Environments. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 26, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Iwarsson, S., Wahl, H. W., Nygren, C., Oswald, F., Sixsmith, A., Sixsmith, J., Szeman, Z., & Tomsone, S. (2007). Importance of the Home Environment for Healthy Aging: Conceptual and Methodological Background of the European ENABLE-AGE Project. Gerontologist, 47(1), 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jenson, S. Q. (2011). Othering, Identity Formation and Agency. Qualitative Studies, 2(2), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones, L., & Wells, K. (2007). Strategies for Academic and Clinician Engagement in Community-Participatory Partnered Research. JAMA, 297(4), 407–410.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.4.407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jones, C. P., Truman, B. I., Elam-Evans, L. D., Jones, C. A., Jones, C. Y., Jiles, R., Rumisha, S. F., & Perry, G. S. (2008). Using “Socially Assigned Race” to Probe White Advantages in Health Status. Ethnicity & Disease, 18(4), 496–504.Google Scholar
  39. Klein, H. (1994). Aging in Place: Adjusting to Later Life Changes. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 153–168.Google Scholar
  40. Kohon, J., & Carder, P. (2014). Exploring Identity and Aging: Auto-Photography and Narratives of Low Income Older Adults. Journal of Aging Studies, 30, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lawthom, R., Sixsmith, J., & Kagan, C. (2007). Interrogating Power: The Case of Arts and Mental Health in Community Projects. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morris, A. (2009). Living on the Margins: Comparing Older Private Renters and Older Public Housing Tenants in Sydney, Australia. Housing Studies, 24(5), 697–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mutschler, P. (1992). Where Elders Live. Generations, 16(2), 715.Google Scholar
  44. Phillipson, C. (2007). The “Elected” and the “Excluded”: Sociological Perspectives on the Experience of Place and Community in Old Age. Ageing & Society, 27(3), 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pink, S. (2013). Doing Visual Ethnography. London, UK: SAGE.Google Scholar
  46. Polk, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary Co-Production: Designing and Testing a Transdisciplinary Research Framework for Societal Problem Solving. Futures, 65, 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prilleltensky, I., & Gonick, L. (1996). Polities Change, Oppression Remains: On the Psychology and Politics of Oppression. Political Psychology, 17(1), 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sixsmith, J. (1986). The Meaning of Home: An Exploratory Study of Environmental Experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sixsmith, A., & Sixsmith, J. (1991). Transitions in Home Experience in Later Life. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 8(3), 181–191.Google Scholar
  53. Sixsmith, A., & Sixsmith, J. (2008). Ageing in Place in the United Kingdom. Ageing International, 32(3), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sixsmith, J., Boneham, M., & Goldring, J. E. (2003). Accessing the Community: Gaining Insider Perspectives from the Outside. Qualitative Health Research, 13(4), 578–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Statistics Canada. (2010). Population Projections for Canada, Provinces and Territories. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  56. Statistics Canada. (2012). The Canadian Population in 2011: Age and Sex. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  57. Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic Interaction and Role Theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aornson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 311–378). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  58. Teixeira, C. (2014). Living on the “Edge of the Suburbs” of Vancouver: A Case Study of the Housing Experiences and Coping Strategies of Recent Immigrants in Surrey and Richmond. The Canadian Geographer, 58(2), 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turcotte, M., & Schellenberg, G. (2007). A Portrait of Seniors in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  60. United Nations. (2013). World Population Ageing 2013. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  61. United Way Lower Mainland. (2011). Seniors Vulnerability Report. Aging with Dignity—Making It Happen for Everyone. Vancouver, BC: United Way Lower Mainland.Google Scholar
  62. Vancouver Foundation. (2012). Connections and Engagement: A Survey of Metro Vancouver. Vancouver, BC: Vancouver Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. VanderPlaat, M., Ramos, H., & Yoshida, Y. (2012). A Preliminary Investigation of the Contributions of Sponsored Parents and Grandparents in Canada. Canadian Journal of Ethnic Studies, 44, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Watt, S. K. (1999). The Story between the Lines: A Thematic Discussion of the Experience of Racism. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. White, A. M. (1994). A Course in the Psychology of Oppression: A Different Approach to Teaching about Diversity. Teaching of Psychology, 21(1), 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. (2012). The Meaning of “Aging in Place” to Older People. Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. World Health Organization. (2007). Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  68. Yep, G. A. (2002). My Three Cultures: Navigating the Multicultural Identity Landscape. In J. N. Martin, T. K. Nakayama, & L. A. Flores (Eds.), Readings in Intercultural Communication (pp. 79–85). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  69. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: University.Google Scholar
  70. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith Sixsmith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mei Lan Fang
    • 2
  • Ryan Woolrych
    • 3
  • Sarah Canham
    • 4
  • Lupin Battersby
    • 5
  • Tori Hui Ren
    • 6
  • Andrew Sixsmith
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Nursing and Health SciencesUniversity of DundeeScotlandUK
  2. 2.School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and SocietyHeriot-Watt UniversityScotlandUK
  3. 3.Department of Health and WellbeingHeriot-Watt UniversityScotlandUK
  4. 4.Department of GerontologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  5. 5.Fraser HealthVancouverCanada
  6. 6.Department of Human EcologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations