Advertisement

Beyond Economic Barriers: Intersectionality and Health Policy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

  • Gita SenEmail author
  • Aditi Iyer
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the The Politics of Intersectionality book series (POLI)

Abstract

Intersectionality—a framework for understanding how multiple sources of power and disadvantage intersect and influence behaviours, practices, and outcomes—increasingly drives a growing body of research the world over. More recent work also focuses on translating these concepts and evidence into the policy sphere. This chapter explores the concepts of deep poverty, hyper entitlements, rationing, and leveraging as linked to the positionality and voice of different groups in the intersectional socioeconomic order. Both positionality and voice are important in determining what policies are enacted, how they come into being and are implemented, and what their impact might be on specific groups. The authors argue that for groups at both extremes of the socioeconomic order, important sources of inequality tend to reinforce each other, albeit in opposing directions. Synergies of this kind do not hold for groups in the middle of the order for whom different sources of advantage and disadvantage may work against each other. These differences also account for the shifting positionality and voice of particular groups across geographic locales and time. They shape the fluidity of relations among groups, as manifested in complex politics of accommodation, negotiation, collaboration, and opposition, with important implications for policy formulation and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining” and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkire, S., Jindra, C., Robles, G., & Vaz, A. (2016, June). Multidimensional Poverty Index – Summer 2016: Brief Methodological Note and Results. OPHI Briefing 42. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Anand, S., & Fan, V. (2016). The Health Workforce in India. Human Resources for Health Observer Series No. 16. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  4. Bassel, L., & Emejulu, A. (2010). Struggles for Institutional Space in France and the United Kingdom: Intersectionality and the Politics of Policy. Politics and Gender, 6(4), 517–544.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X10000358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, F. (2013). Researching Within-Household Distribution: Overview, Developments, Debates, and Methodological Challenges. Family Relations, 75, 582–597.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berman, P., Ahuja, R., & Bhandari, L. (2010). The Impoverishing Effect of Healthcare Payments in India: New Methodology and Findings. Economic and Political Weekly, XLV(16), 65–71.Google Scholar
  7. Borooah, V. K., Sabharwal, N. S., Diwakar, D. G., Mishra, V. K., & Naik, A. K. (2015). Caste, Discrimination, and Exclusion in Modern India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerceau, S. (2012, December). Gender Equality in Access to Health Care: The Role of Social Health Protection. A Case Study on India’s National Health Insurance Scheme RSBY. GIZ Discussion Papers on Social Protection, no. 15.Google Scholar
  10. CSDH (Commission on Social Determinants of Health). (2008). Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  11. Damoon, R. K. (2011). Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspectives on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutta, M., & Husain, Z. (2013). Does Health Insurance Ensure Equitable Health Outcomes? An Analysis of Hospital Services Usage in Urban India. World Health Population, 14(4), 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folbre, N. (1986). Hearts and Spades: Paradigms of Household Economics. World Development, 14(2), 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gavaskar, M. (2015). Patidar Anamat Andolan: Reinventing a Social Identity. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(40), 1–2, http://www.epw.in/node/145894/pdf.Google Scholar
  16. Government of India. (2006). Social, Economic and Educational Status of the Muslim Community of India: A Report. Prime Minister’s High Level Committee. New Delhi: Cabinet Secretariat, Government of India.Google Scholar
  17. Hancock, A.-M. (2007). When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hankivsky, O., & Cormier, R. (2011). Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hankivsky, O., Grace, D., Hunting, G., Giesbrecht, M., Fridkin, A., Rudrum, S., et al. (2014). An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework: Critical Reflections on a Methodology for Advancing Equity. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13, 119 Retrieved from http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/13/1/119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iyer, A., Sen, G., & George, A. (2007). The Dynamics of Gender and Class in Access to Health Care: Evidence from Rural Karnataka, India. International Journal of Health Services, 37(3), 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jain, K. (2013, June). Health Financing and Delivery in India: An Overview of Selected Schemes. WIEGO Working Paper (Social Protection), no. 29.Google Scholar
  22. Joe, W. (2014). Intersectional Inequalities in Immunization in India, 1992–93 to 2005–06: A Progress Assessment. Health Policy and Planning, 30, 407–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Katz, E. (1997). The Intra-Household Economics of Voice and Exit. Feminist Economics, 3(3), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kidd, S. (2014, April). Social Exclusion and Access to Social Protection Schemes. Australian Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Retrieved from http://www.developmentpathways.co.uk/resources/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/social-exclusion-and-access-to-social-protection-schemes4.pdf.
  25. Krieger, N. (2005). Embodiment: A Conceptual Glossary for Epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 350–355.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.024562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krieger, N., & Smith, G. D. (2004). ‘Bodies Count’, and Body Counts: Social Epidemiology and Embodying Inequality. Epidemiologic Reviews, 26, 92–103.  https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxh009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lombardo, E., & Agustin, L. R. (2012). Framing Gender Intersections in the European Union: What Implications for the Quality of Intersectionality in Policies? Social Politics, 19(4), 482–512.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manuel, T. (2006). Envisioning the Possibilities for a Good Life: Exploring the Public Policy Implications of Intersectionality Theory. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 28(3–4), 173–203.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J501v28n03_08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nandi, A., Ashok, A., & Laxminarayan, R. (2013). The Socioeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Participation in India’s Health Insurance Scheme for the Poor. PLoS One, 8(6), e66296.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Narayana, D. (2010). Review of the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana. Economic and Political Weekly, XLV(29), 13–18.Google Scholar
  31. NRHM (National Rural Health Mission). (2013). Guidance Note for Implementation of RMNCH+A Interventions in High Priority Districts, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  32. Parken, A., & Young, H. (2007). Integrating the Promotion of Equality and Human Rights for All, Cardiff, Wales: Towards the Commission of Equality and Human Rights. Unpublished Report for the Welsh Assembly Government and Equality and Human Rights Commission; Cited by Hankivsky, O. & Cormier, R. (2011). Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 217–229.Google Scholar
  33. Ram, F., Mohanty, S. K., & Ram, U. (2009). Understanding the Distribution of BPLCards: All-India and Selected States. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIV(7), 66–71.Google Scholar
  34. Rao, K. S. (2013, June 26). Doctors by Merit, Not Privilege. The Hindu, p. 10.Google Scholar
  35. Rathi, P., Mukherji, A., & Sen, G. (2012). Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana: Evaluating Utilisation, Roll-Out and Perceptions in Amaravati District, Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVII(39), 57–63.Google Scholar
  36. Sarin, A., & Gupta, S. (2014, September 20). Not Leading Towards an Egalitarian Education System: Quotas Under the Right to Education. Economic and Political Weekly, 49 (38), 65–72.Google Scholar
  37. Sen, G. (2010). Poor Households or Poor Women: Is There a Difference? In S. Chant (Ed.), The International Handbook on Gender and Poverty (pp. 101–105). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publication.Google Scholar
  38. Sen, G. (2012). Universal Health Coverage in India: A Long and Winding Road. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(8), 46–52.Google Scholar
  39. Sen, G., & Iyer, A. (2012). Who Gains, Who Loses, and How: Leveraging Gender and Class Intersections to Secure Health Entitlements. Social Science and Medicine, 74(11), 1802–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sen, G., & Iyer, A. (2015). Health Policy in India: Some Critical Concerns. In E. Kuhlmann, R. H. Blank, I. L. Bourgeault, & C. Wendt (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Healthcare Policy and Governance (pp. 154–170). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sen, G., Iyer, A., & Mukherjee, C. (2009). A Methodology to Analyse the Intersections of Social Inequalities in Health. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(3), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sen, G., Iyer, A., Virani, A., Reddy, B., & Selvakumar, S. (2017). Translating Health Research to Policy: Breaking Through the Impermeability Barrier. In J. Georgalakis, N. Jessani, R. Oronje, & B. Ramalingam (Eds.), The Social Realities of Knowledge for Development (pp. 32–51). Brighton: IDS/Impact Initiative.Google Scholar
  43. Smooth, W. G. (2013). Intersectionality from Theoretical Framework to Policy Intervention. In A. R. Wilson (Ed.), Situating Intersectionality: Politics, Policy and Power (pp. 11–43). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sun, C. (2011). An Analysis of RSBY Enrolment Patterns: Preliminary Evidence and Lessons from the Early Experience. In R. Palacios, J. Das, & C. Sun (Eds.), India’s Health Insurance for the Poor. Evidence from the Early Experience of the Rashtriya Swathya Bima Yojana (pp. 84–116). New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research.Google Scholar
  45. Sundararaman, T., & Muraleedharan, V. R. (2015). Falling Sick, Paying the Price: NSS 71st Round on Morbidity and Costs of Healthcare. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(33), 17–20.Google Scholar
  46. Swarup, A., & Jain, N. (n.d.). Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana – A Case Study from India. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://www.rsby.gov.in/Documents.aspx?ID=14.
  47. Tilche, A. (2016). Migration, Bachelorhood and Discontent Among the Patidars. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(26–27), 17–24.Google Scholar
  48. Townsend, P. B., Whitehead, M., & Davidson, N. (1992). Inequalities in Health: The Black Report and the Health Divide (new 3rd ed.). London: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  49. van Deurzen, I., van Oorschot, W., & van Ingen, E. (2014). The Link Between Inequality and Population Health in Low and Middle Income Countries: Policy Myth or Social Reality? PLoS One, 9(12), e115109.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vijaya, R. M., Lahoti, R., & Swaminathan, H. (2014). Moving from the Household to the Individual: Multidimensional Poverty Analysis. World Development, 59, 70–81  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walby, S., Armstrong, J., & Strid, S. (2012). Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory. Sociology, 46(2), 224–240.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Whitehead, M., Dahlgren, G., & Evans, T. (2001). Equity and Health Sector Reforms: Can Low-Income Countries Escape the Medical Poverty Trap? The Lancet, 358, 833–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  54. Wilson, A. R. (Ed.). (2013). Situating Intersectionality: Politics, Policy and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. World Bank. (2016). World Development Indicators. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PUBL.ZS?view=chart.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Public Health Foundation of IndiaBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options