Advertisement

Popularity and Geospatial Spread of Trends on Twitter: A Middle Eastern Case Study

  • Nabeel Albishry
  • Tom Crick
  • Tesleem Fagade
  • Theo Tryfonas
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11055)

Abstract

Thousands of topics trend on Twitter across the world every day, making it increasingly challenging to provide real-time analysis of current issues, topics and themes being discussed across various locations and jurisdictions. There is thus a demand for simple and extensible approaches to provide deeper insight into these trends and how they propagate across locales. This paper represents one of the first studies to look at geospatial spread of trends on Twitter, presenting various techniques to provide increased understanding of how trends on social networks can spread across various regions and nations. It is based on a year-long data collection (N = 2,307,163) and analysis between 2016–2017 of seven Middle Eastern countries (Bahrain, Egypt, Kuwait, Lebanon, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates). Using this year-long dataset, the project investigates the popularity and geospatial spread of trends, focusing on trend information but not processing individual topics, with the findings showing that likelihood of trends spreading to other locales is to a large extent influenced by the place in which it first appeared.

Keywords

Trends Topic spread Popularity Network graphs Twitter 

References

  1. 1.
    Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G., Vespignani, A.: The parable of google flu: traps in big data analysis. Science 343(6176), 1203–1205 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parker, J., Yates, A., Goharian, N., Frieder, O.: Health-related hypothesis generation using social media data. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 5(7), 7 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blamey, B., Crick, T., Oatley, G.: ‘The First Day of Summer’: parsing temporal expressions with distributed semantics. In: Bramer, M., Petridis, M. (eds.) SGAI 2013, pp. 389–402. Springer, Cham (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02621-3_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bello, G., Menéndez, H., Okazaki, S., Camacho, D.: Extracting collective trends from Twitter using social-based data mining. In: Bǎdicǎ, C., Nguyen, N.T., Brezovan, M. (eds.) ICCCI 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8083, pp. 622–630. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40495-5_62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albishry, N., Crick, T., Tryfonas, T., Fagade, T.: An evaluation of performance and competition in customer services on Twitter: a UK telecoms case study. In: Companion of The Web Conference 2018. Social Sensing and Enterprise Intelligence: Towards a Smart Enterprise Transformation (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fang, A., Ounis, I., Habel, P., Macdonald, C., Limsopatham, N.: Topic-centric classification of Twitter user’s political orientation. In: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 791–794 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, Y., Ruan, X., Wang, H., Wang, H., He, S.: Twitter trends manipulation: a first look inside the security of Twitter trending. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 12(1), 144–156 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Irani, D., Webb, S., Pu, C., Drive, F., Gsrc, B.: Study of trend-stuffing on Twitter through text classification. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Collaboration, Electronic Messaging, AntiAbuse and Spam Conference (CEAS 2010) (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sedhai, S., Sun, A.: HSpam14: a collection of 14 million tweets for hashtag-oriented spam research. In: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 223–232 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chu, Z., Widjaja, I., Wang, H.: Detecting social spam campaigns on Twitter. In: Bao, F., Samarati, P., Zhou, J. (eds.) ACNS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7341, pp. 455–472. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31284-7_27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    VanDam, C., Tan, P.N.: Detecting hashtag hijacking from Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science (WebSci 2016), pp. 370–371 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanderson, J., Barnes, K., Williamson, C., Kian, E.T.: ‘How could anyone have predicted that #AskJameis would go horribly wrong?’ Public relations, social media, and hashtag hijacking. Public Relat. Rev. 42(1), 31–37 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zubiaga, A., Spina, D., Fresno, V., Martínez, R.: Classifying trending topics: a typology of conversation triggers on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 461–2464 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benhardus, J., Kalita, J.: Streaming trend detection in Twitter. Int. J. Web Based Communities 9(1), 122–139 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferragina, P., Piccinno, F., Santoro, R.: On analyzing hashtags in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 9th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2015), pp. 110–119 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Albishry, N., Crick, T., Tryfonas, T.: “Come Together!”: interactions of language networks and multilingual communities on Twitter. In: Nguyen, N.T., Papadopoulos, G.A., Jędrzejowicz, P., Trawiński, B., Vossen, G. (eds.) ICCCI 2017, Part II. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10449, pp. 469–478. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67077-5_45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ten Thij, M., Bhulai, S.: Modelling trend progression through an extension of the Polya Urn process. In: Wierzbicki, A., Brandes, U., Schweitzer, F., Pedreschi, D. (eds.) NetSci-X 2016. LNCS, vol. 9564, pp. 57–67. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28361-6_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mathioudakis, M., Koudas, N.: TwitterMonitor: trend detection over the Twitter stream. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 1155–1158 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zubiaga, A., Spina, D., Martínez, R., Fresno, V.: Real-time classification of Twitter trends. J. Assoc. Int. Sci. Tech. 66(3), 462–473 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tufekci, Z.: Big questions for social media big data: representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. In: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2014) (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    United Nations: World Population Prospects 2017. Technical report, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salem, F.: Social media and the internet of things towards data-driven policymaking in the Arab world: potential, limits and concerns. Technical report, The Arab Social Media Report, MBR School of Government, Dubai, February 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nabeel Albishry
    • 1
    • 3
  • Tom Crick
    • 2
  • Tesleem Fagade
    • 1
  • Theo Tryfonas
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  3. 3.Faculty of Computing and ITKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations