Introduction: Comparative Regionalism, Why Bother (Again?)

  • Kevin Parthenay


Comparative regionalism has generated a massive academic production. Before starting a journey within what has become an established field of research, it is necessary to recall the reasons that justify an additional contribution. This introduction aims at drawing a general picture of how regionalisms echo the main transformations of world politics and can serve as a grid to understand the international system.


Regionalisms World politics Brexit Post-TPP world Comparison 


  1. Acharya, A. (2005a). Do Norms and Identity Matter? Community and Power in Southeast Asia’s Regional Order. The Pacific Review, 18(1), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, A. (2005b). International Relations and Area Studies: Towards a New Synthesis? Paper presented to the “Workshop on the Future of Interdisciplinary Area Studies in the UK”, St Antony’s College, Oxford University, December 6–7, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. Acharya, A. (2012). Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time Has Come? The International Spectator, 47(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Acharya, A., & Johnston, A. (Eds.). (2007). Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allison-Reumann, L., & Murray, P. (2017, September 8). Will Brexit Affect Regionalism in Southeast Asia? The Diplomat.
  7. Bach, D. (2016). Regionalism in Africa: Genealogies, Institutions and Trans-State Networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Baldwin, R. (2011). 21st Century Regionalism: Filling the Gap Between 21st Century Trade and 20th Century Trade Rules, No ERSD-2011–08. WTO Staff Working Papers, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division, Geneva.Google Scholar
  9. Bates, R. (1997). Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy? Political Science and Politics, 30(2), 166–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Börzel, T. (2011). Comparative Regionalism. A New Research Agenda, KFG Working Paper Series, No. 28.Google Scholar
  11. Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2009). The Transformative Power of Europe. The European Union and the Diffusion of Ideas. Working Paper No 1, Research College “The Transformative Power of Europe”, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  12. Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2012). From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction. West European Politics, 35(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Briceño-Ruiz, J., & De Lombaerde, P. (Eds.). (forthcoming). Latin America in the Pacific Rim. Regionalism and Trans-Pacific Relations in a Post-TPP World. Routledge, IPENR Series.Google Scholar
  15. Dabène, O. (2009). The Politics of Regional Integration in Latin America. Theoretical and Comparatives Explorations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Dabène, O. (2012, May 25). Explaining Latin America’s Fourth Wave of Regionalism. Regional Integration of a Third Kind. 2012 Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), Panel “Waves of Change in Latin America. History and Politics”, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  17. De Lombaerde, P., & Schulz, M. (Eds.). (2009). The EU and World Regionalism. The Makability of Regions in the 21st Century, coll. The International Political Economy of the New Regionalisms. Ashgate: Burlington.Google Scholar
  18. Financial Times. (2018, January 23). 11 Countries ‘To Seal’ Pacific Free Trade Pact: Japan.
  19. Genna, G., & De Lombaerde, P. (2010). The Small N Methodological Challenges of Analysing Regional Integration. Journal of European Integration, 32(6), 583–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grugel, J. (2004). New Regionalism and Modes of Governance—Comparing US and EU Strategies in Latin America. European Journal of International Relations, 10(4), 603–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grugel, J. (2007). Democratization and Ideational Diffusion: Europe, Mercosur and Social Citizenship. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45, 43–68.Google Scholar
  22. Henke, S., & Asmelash, A. (2016, October). Brexit: Lessons for Regionalism in Africa, Africa Portal. Online Access.
  23. Jetschke, A. (2009). Institutionalizing ASEAN: Celebrating Europe Through Network Governance. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jetschke, A., & Lenz, T. (2013). Does Regionalism Diffuse? A New Research Agenda for the Study of Regional Organizations. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 626–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jetschke, A., & Murray, P. (2012). Diffusing Regional Integration: The EU and Southeast Asia. West European Politics, 35(1), 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jetschke, A., & Thiener, P. (2015). The Diffusion of Institutional Design among Regional Organizations, University of Göttingen.Google Scholar
  27. Jetschke, et al. (2017). A Bird’s Eye View of the Elephants. The Comparative Regional Organizations Project, Conference Paper, German Political Science Association (DVPW) IR Section Conference 2017, Bremen.Google Scholar
  28. Jetschke, A., Theiner, P., & Münch, S. (2018). The Diffusion of Institutional Designs Among Regional Organizations. Paper presented at the Closing Conference of the KFG “The Transformative Power of Europe Re-Visited”, Berlin, June 7–9, 2018.Google Scholar
  29. Katzenstein, P. (2005). A World of Regions. Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lindemann, T. (2016). Chapitre 2 – La construction de l’objet et la comparaison dans l’étude des relations internationales. Dans Méthodes de recherche en relations internationales (pp. 39–56). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po (P.F.N.S.P.).Google Scholar
  31. Lorenz-Carl, U., & Rempel, M. (2013). Mapping Agency. Comparing Regionalisms in Africa. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Ludden, D. (1998). Area Studies in the Age of Globalization. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 1–22.Google Scholar
  33. Mahoney, J. (2007). Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 40(2), 122–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mansfield, E., & Milner, H. (1999). The New Wave of Regionalism. International Organization, 53(3), 589–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mattheis, F. (2014). New Regionalism in the South – Mercosur and SADC in a Comparative and Interregional Perspective, Global History and International Studies. Leipzig: Leibniz University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mattli, W. (2012). Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Developments. In E. Jones, A. Menon, & S. Weatherill (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Muntschick, J. (2013). Explaining the Influence of Extra-Regional Actors on Regional Economic Integration in Southern Africa: The EU’s Interfering Impact on SADC and SACU. In U. Lorenz-Carl & M. Rempel (Eds.), Mapping Agency. Comparing Regionalisms in Africa (pp. 77–95). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  38. Nolte, D. (2017, December 14). Bringing EU Studies Back to Latin American Regionalism? International Research Seminar. CERI/Sciences Po, Paris, Unpublished.Google Scholar
  39. Panke, D., Lang, S., & Wiedemann, A. (2015). Regional Actors in the United Nations. Exploring the Regionalization of International Negotiations. Global Affairs, 1(4/5), 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Panke, D., Lang, S., & Wiedemann, A. (2017). State and Regional Actors in Complex Governance Systems. Exploring Dynamics of International Negotiations. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(1), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parthenay, K. (2015). Hauts fonctionnaires et organisations régionales en Amérique centrale : émergence informelle du supranationalisme. Revue internationale de politique comparée, 22(1), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parthenay, K. (2018). La gouvernance des régionalismes Latino-américains : une exploration comparée du rôle des Secrétaires généraux régionaux. Paris: Etudes du CERI.Google Scholar
  43. Riggirozzi, P., & Tussie, D. (2012). The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Risse, T. (2016). Explaining Regionalism: Diffusion, Translation, and Adaptation. In T. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Russo, A. (2016). Comparative Regionalism: Still Emerging, Already to Be Reformed? International Politics Reviews, 4(1), 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sbragia, A. (2008). Review Article: Comparative Regionalism: What Might It Be? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46, 29–49.Google Scholar
  47. Schmitter, P., & Lefkofridi, Z. (2015). Neofunctionalism as a Theory of Disintegration, 22nd, CES Conference.Google Scholar
  48. The Economist. (2016). No Brussels Here. How Latin America May Prosper from a Different Kind of Integration.
  49. Tvedad, J. (2014). The Pacific Alliance: Regional Integration or Fragmentation? Policy Briefing, Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies, Bruxelles.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Parthenay
    • 1
  1. 1.Sciences PoParisFrance

Personalised recommendations