Advertisement

The Future of the Euro Area: The Possible Reforms

  • Jérôme Creel
  • Francesco Saraceno
Chapter

Abstract

Although the European Union (EU) is supposed to ensure the prosperity of its members, several member states have been going through a serious economic and social crisis. The organization of economic policies in the euro area is certainly far from optimal. Far-reaching institutional reforms are needed in order to meet a number of key aims: boost economic development, improve upward convergence, and increase stability. There is certainly no shortage of individual proposals on the table. It is helpful to group the proposals into two fundamental views, which have a contrasting philosophy and endorse quite different tools. The first view focuses on the compliance with agreed rules and places faith in market discipline to incentivize improved competitiveness and reduced public indebtedness. The second view highlights the requirements of solidarity and coordination between the EU Member States. While both views have their pros and cons, the ongoing process of reforms has left the euro area with minimal proposals by the Commission that do not clearly decide which of these two views would be the preferred one.

Keywords

Eurozone budget Risk-sharing Market discipline Fiscal rules MIP 

References

  1. Aparisi de Lannoy, L., and X. Ragot. 2017. Une (ré) assurance chômage européenne. OFCE Policy Brief 28, November 30.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, C., W. Köhler-Töglhofer, and A. Stiglbauer. 2014. A Common European Unemployment Insurance – A Much Debated Route Toward European Fiscal Union. Monetary Policy & the Economy 4: 35–52.Google Scholar
  3. Bénassy-Quéré, A., M. Brunnermeier, H. Enderlein, E. Farhi, M. Fratzscher, C. Fuest, P.-O. Gourinchas, P. Martin, J. Pisani-Ferry, H. Rey, I. Schnabel, N. Véron, B. Weder di Mauro, and J. Zettelmeyer. 2018. Reconciling Risk Sharing with Market Discipline: A Constructive Approach to Euro Area Reform. CEPR Policy Insight No. 91.Google Scholar
  4. Brunnermeier, M.K., L. Garicano, P.R. Lane, M. Pagano, R. Reis, T. Santos, and D. Vayanos. 2016. The Sovereign-Bank Diabolic Loop and ESBies. American Economic Review 106 (5): 508–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corsetti, G., L. Feld, P.R. Lane, L. Reichlin, D. Vayanos, H. Rey, and B. Weder di Mauro. 2015. A New Start for the Eurozone: Dealing with Debt. London: CEPR Press.Google Scholar
  6. Corsetti, G., L. Dedola, M. Jarociński, B. Mackowiak, C. Allard, J. Bluedorn, and B. Weder di Mauro. 2017. Business Cycle Stabilisation in the Eurozone: Ways Forward. VoxEU, November 15.Google Scholar
  7. Creel, J. 2018a. Le Fonds Monétaire Européen: un instrument plus politique qu’économique. Revue de l’euro 52.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2018b. Convergence in EMU: What and How? In-Depth Analysis, ECON, European Parliament, May.Google Scholar
  9. De Grauwe, P. 2012. The Governance of a Fragile Eurozone. Australian Economic Review 45 (3): 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delpla, J., and J. von Weizsäcker. 2010. Bruegel Policy Brief No. 2010/03, Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. Dullien, S. 2007. Improving Economic Stability: What the Euro Area Can Learn from the United States’ Unemployment Insurance. Working Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft and Politik FG 1, 2007/11.Google Scholar
  12. Manassé, P., and D. Katsikas. 2018. Economic Crisis and Structural Reforms in Southern Europe. Routledge Studies in the European Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Marjolin, R., F. Bobba, H. Bosman, G. Brouwers, L. Camu, B. Clappier, I. Foighel, F. Forte, H. Giersch, P. Lynch, D. MacDougall, H. Markmann, F. Peeters, A. Shonfield, and N. Thysegen. 1975. Report of the Study Group ‘Economic and Monetary Union 1980’. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  14. Pâris, P., and C. Wyplosz. 2014. PADRE: Politically Acceptable Debt Restructuring in the Eurozone. Geneva Reports on the World Economy, Geneva/London.Google Scholar
  15. Sandbu, M. 2018. Make Do and Mend in the EU. Financial Times – Free Lunch, February 5.Google Scholar
  16. Sinn, H.-W. 2014. Austerity, Growth and Inflation: Remarks on the Eurozone’s Unresolved Competitiveness Problem. World Economics 37 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wyplosz, C. 2017. A European Monetary Fund? Paper requested by the European Parliament, PE 602.076, IPOL, EGOV.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OFCE, Sciences PoParisFrance
  2. 2.ESCP EuropeParisFrance
  3. 3.LUISSRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations