Semantic Interoperability of Multilingual Language Resources by Automatic Mapping

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11032)


The PMKI project is an European Commission action aiming to create a public multilingual knowledge management infrastructure to support e-commerce solutions in a multilingual environment. Such infrastructure will consist in a set of tools able to create interoperability between multilingual classification systems (like thesauri) and other language resources, so that they can be easily accessible through a Web dissemination platform and reusable by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), as well as by public administrations. In this paper the standards used to represent language resources and a methodology for automatic mapping between thesauri, based on an information retrieval framework, are presented.


Semantic interoperability Language resources Information retrieval Semantic mapping Ontolex-Lemon 


  1. 1.
    Pazienza, M.T., Stellato, A., Turbati, A.: Linguistic watermark 3.0: an RDF framework and a software library for bridging language and ontologies in the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP 2008), Rome, Italy (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oltramari, A., Stellato, A.: Enriching ontologies with linguistic content: an evaluation framework. In: Proceedings of OntoLex 2008, Marrakech, Morocco (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cimiano, P., Haase, P., Herold, M., et al.: LexOnto: a model for ontology lexicons for ontology-based NLP. In: Proceedings of the OntoLex 2007 Workshop (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buitelaar, P., Declerck, T., Frank, A., et al.: LingInfo: design and applications of a model for the integration of linguistic information in ontologies. In: Proceedings of OntoLex 2006, Genoa, Italy (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Montiel-Ponsoda, E., Aguado De Cea, G., Gómez-Pérez, A., et al.: Enriching ontologies with multilingual information. Nat. Lang. Eng. XVII(3), 283–309 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cimiano, P., Buitelaar, P., McCrae, J., et al.: LexInfo: a declarative model for the lexicon-ontology interface. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web IX(1), 29–51 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCrae, J., Aguado-De-Cea, G., Buitelaar, P., et al.: Interchanging lexical resources on the semantic web. Lang. Resour. Eval. XLVI(4), 701–719 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCrae, J., Bosque-Gil, J., Gracia, J., et al.: The Ontolex-Lemon model: development and applications. In: Proceedings of eLex 2017 conference, pp. 19–21 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J.A., Lassila, O.: The semantic web: a new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Sci. Am. CCLXXXIV(5), 34–43 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cimiano, P., Unger, C., McCrae, J.: Ontology-based interpretation of natural language. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. VII(2), 1–178 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiarcos, C., Nordhoff, S., Hellmann, S. (eds.): Linked Data in Linguistics. Spinger, Heidelberg (2012). Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borin, L., Dannells, D., Forsberg, M., et al.: Representing Swedish lexical resources in RDF with lemon. In: Proceedings of the ISWC 2014 Posters & Demonstrations Track, Riva del Garda, Italy, pp. 329–332 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Navigli, R., Ponzetto, S.: BabelNet: the automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network. Artif. Intell. CXCIII, 217–250 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eckle-Kohler, J., Mccrae, J., Chiarcos, C.: Lemonuby-a large, interlinked, syntactically-rich lexical resource for ontologies. Semant. Web VI(4), 371–378 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buitelaar, P.: Ontology-based semantic lexicons: mapping between terms and object descriptions. In: Huang, C.R., Calzolari, N., Gangemi, A., et al. (eds.) Ontology and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cimiano, P., Mccrae, J., Buitelaar, P., Montiel-Ponsoda, E.: On the role of senses in the ontology-lexicon. In: Oltramari, A., Vossen, P., Qin, L., Hovy, E. (eds.) New Trends of Research in Ontologies and Lexical Resources. Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing, pp. 43–62. Springer, Berlin (2013). Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fiorelli, M., Stellato, A., McCrae, J.P., Cimiano, P., Pazienza, M.T.: LIME: the metadata module for OntoLex. In: Gandon, F., Sabou, M., Sack, H., d’Amato, C., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Zimmermann, A. (eds.) ESWC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9088, pp. 321–336. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fiorelli, M., Pazienza, M.T., Stellato, A.: A meta-data driven platform for semi-automatic configuration of ontology mediators. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), Reykjavik, Iceland, pp. 26–31, May 2014Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Resnik, P.: Disambiguating noun groupings with respect to WordNet senses. In: Armstrong, S., Church, K., Isabelle, P., Manzi, S., Tzoukermann, E., Yarowsky, D. (eds.) Natural Language Processing Using Very Large Corpora. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol. 11, pp. 77–98. Springer, Dordrecht (1999). Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A survey of schema-based matching approaches. In: Spaccapietra, S. (ed.) Journal on Data Semantics IV. LNCS, vol. 3730, pp. 146–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lacasta, J., Nogueras-Iso, J., Falquet, G., Teller, J., Zarazaga-Soria, F.J.: Design and evaluation of a semantic enrichment process for bibliographic databases. Data Knowl. Eng. 88, 94–107 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Francesconi, E., Bartoloni, G.: Sharing knowledge by conceptual mapping: the case of EU thesaural interoperability. In: Proceedings of the JURIX Conference, pp. 17–26. IOS Press (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval. Addison Wesley, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liang, A.C., Sini, M.: Mapping AGROVOC and the Chinese agricultural thesaurus: definitions, tools, procedures. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimed. 12(1), 51–62 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Union 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Publications Office of the European UnionLuxembourg CityLuxembourg
  2. 2.Institute of Legal Information Theory and Techniques of CNR (ITTIG-CNR)RomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Enterprise EngineeringUniversity of Rome Tor VergataRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations