Hierarchies, Division, and Exclusion

  • Sarah E. Jankowitz
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict book series (PSCAC)


This chapter examines the impact hierarchies may have on peacebuilding and reconciliation processes, and in particular those hierarchies structured according to moral and intergroup claims about victimhood and violence. Here, it brings full circle the argument that exclusive constructions of victims and perpetrators may compromise thicker reconciliation by demonstrating how hierarchies resonating with the victim-perpetrator paradigm reinforce societal divisions and exclude complex victims from acknowledgement. Political appropriation of these hierarchies further exacerbates division and exclusion, proving damaging for individual victims as well as prospects for societal reconciliation. The on-going campaign to secure a pension for those who were severely physically injured as a result of the conflict serves to illustrate the detrimental outworking of these hierarchies in the political arena.


Victims Hierarchy Division Exclusion Reconciliation 


  1. Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov. 2004. Dialectics Between Stable Peace and Reconciliation. In From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, ed. Y. Bar-Siman-Tov, 61–80. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Tal, Daniel, Lily Chernyak-Hai, Noa Schori, and Ayelet Gundar. 2009. A Sense of Self-Perceived Collective Victimhood in Intractable Conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross 91 (874): 229–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BBC News. 2014. Northern Ireland Churches: Haass Talks ‘Missed Opportunity’ (Online), August 14, 2014.
  4. Bloomfield, Sir Kenneth. 1998. We Will Remember Them. Belfast: Northern Ireland Victims Commission.Google Scholar
  5. Bouris, Erica. 2007. Complex Political Victims. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Brewer, Marilynn. 2001. Ingroup Identification and Intergroup Conflict: When Does Ingroup Love Become Outgroup Hate? In Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Reduction, ed. D. Ashmore, L.J. Jussim, and D. Wilder, 17–41. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brewer, John D. 2006. Memory, Truth and Victimhood in Post-Trauma Societies. In The Sage Handbook of Nations and Nationalism, ed. G. Delanty and K. Kumar, 214–224. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2010. Peace Processes: A Sociological Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carrabine, Eamonn, Pamela Cox, Maggy Lee, Ken Plummer, and Nigel South. 2004. Criminology: A Sociological Introduction. Book. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christie, Nils. 1986. The Ideal Victim. In From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System, ed. Ezzat A. Fattah, 17–30. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Consultative Group on the Past. 2009. Report of the Consultative Group on the Past. Belfast: Consultative Group on the Past Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
  12. Deloitte. 2007. A Report into the Financial Cost of the Northern Ireland Divide. Belfast: Deloitte.Google Scholar
  13. Democratic Unionist Party. 2003. A Voice for Victims: The Democratic Unionist Party’s Policy on Innocent Victims of Terrorism. Belfast: Democratic Unionist Party.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2014. Our Key Commitments to the Innocent Victims of Terrorism. Belfast: Democratic Unionist Party.Google Scholar
  15. Fay, Marie Therese, Mike Morrissey, and Marie Smyth. 1998. Mapping Troubles-Related Deaths in Northern Ireland. Derry/Londonderry: INCORE.Google Scholar
  16. Goodey, Jo. 2005. Victims and Victimology: Research, Policy and Practice. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Govier, Trudy. 2006. Taking Wrongs Seriously: Acknowledgement, Reconciliation and the Politics of Sustainable Peace. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  18. Graham, Laura Fowler. 2014. The ‘Innocent’ Victims of the Troubles and the Enduring Impediment to Peace in Northern Ireland. Shared Space: A Research Journal on Peace, Conflict and Community Relations in Northern Ireland 17: 37–54.Google Scholar
  19. Gready, Paul. 2011. The Era of Transitional Justice: The Aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and Beyond. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hayner, Priscilla B. 2011. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hearty, Kevin. 2016. Legislating Hierarchies of Victimhood and Perpetrators: The Civil Service (Special Advisers) Act (Northern Ireland) 2013 and the Meta-Conflict. Social & Legal Studies 25 (3): 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herman, Judith Lewis. 2001. Trauma and Recovery. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
  23. Hermann, Tamar. 2004. Reconciliation: Reflections on the Theoretical and Practical Utility of the Term. In From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, ed. Yaacov Bar-Siman-Tov, 39–60. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huyse, Luc. 2003a. Offenders. In Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook, ed. David Bloomfield, Teresa Barnes, and Luc Huyse, 67–76. Stockholm: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2003b. Victims. In Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook, ed. David Bloomfield, Teresa Barnes, and Luc Huyse, 53–66. Stockholm: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
  26. Jankowitz, Sarah. 2018. Intergroup Struggles over Victimhood in Violent Conflict: The Victim-Perpetrator Paradigm. International Review of Victimology 24(3): 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2017. Sociopolitical Implications of Exclusive, Intergroup Perceptions of Victims in Societies Emerging from Conflict. Peacebuilding 5 (3): 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelman, Herbert C. 1999. Transforming the Relationship Between Former Enemies: A Social-Psychological Analysis. In After the Peace: Resistance and Reconciliation, ed. R.L. Rothstein, 193–205. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2004. Reconciliation as Identity Change: A Social-Psychological Perspective. In From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, ed. Yaacov Bar-Siman-Tov, 111–124. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knox, Colin. 2001. The ‘Deserving’ Victims of Political Violence: ‘Punishment’ Attacks in Northern Ireland. Criminology and Criminal Justice 1: 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawther, Cheryl. 2013. Denial, Silence and the Politics of the Past: Unpicking the Opposition to Truth Recovery in Northern Ireland. International Journal of Transitional Justice 7: 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2014. Truth, Denial and Transition: Northern Ireland and the Contested Past. Abingdon: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lederach, John Paul. 2005. The Moral Imagination: The Art and Soul of Building Peace. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. 2008. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  35. MacBride, Patricia. 2003. What Next? In Recognition & Reckoning: The Way Ahead on Victims Issues, ed. Brandon Hamber, Robin Wilson, and Report No, 36–40. Belfast: Democratic Dialogue.Google Scholar
  36. Mawby, R.I., and Sandra Walklate. 1994. Critical Victimology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  37. McAlinden, Anne Marie. 2014. Deconstructing Victim and Offender Identities in Discourses on Child Sexual Abuse. British Journal of Criminology 54 (2): 180–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McEvoy, Kieran, and Kirsten McConnachie. 2013. Victims and Transitional Justice: Voice, Agency and Blame. Social & Legal Studies 22: 489–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McKittrick, David, Seamus Kelters, Brian Feeney, Chris Thornton, and David McVea. 2007. Lost Lives: The Stories of the Men, Women and Children Who Died as a Result of the Northern Ireland Troubles. Updated ed. Edinburg: Mainstream Publishing Company Ltd.Google Scholar
  40. Moffett, Luke. 2015. A Pension for Injured Victims of the Troubles: Reparations or Reifying Victim Hierarchy? Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 66 (4): 297–319.Google Scholar
  41. Morrissey, Mike, and Marie Smyth. 2002. Northern Ireland After the Good Friday Agreement: Victims, Grievance and Blame. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  42. Newman, Edward. 2002. ‘Transitional Justice’: The Impact of Transitional Norms and the UN. In Recovering from Civil Conflict: Reconciliation, Peace and Development, ed. Edward Newman and Arie Schnabel, 31–50. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  43. Noor, Masi, Nurit Shnabel, Samer Halabi, and Arie Nadler. 2012. When Suffering Begets Suffering. Personality and Social Psychology Review 16 (4): 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Northern Ireland Assembly. 2013. Civil Service (Special Advisers) Act (Northern Ireland) 2013. Belfast: Northern Ireland Assembly.
  45. Northern Ireland Department of Health and Social Services. 1998. Living with the Trauma of the Troubles. Belfast: Northern Ireland Department of Health and Social Services.Google Scholar
  46. Northern Ireland Executive. 2014. Stormont House Agreement. Belfast: Northern Ireland Executive.Google Scholar
  47. O’Rawe, Mary. 2003. Truth and Justice. In Recognition & Reckoning: The Way Ahead on Victims Issues, 52–55. Belfast: Democratic Dialogue 15.Google Scholar
  48. Parlevliet, Michelle. 1999. Telling the Truth in the Wake of Mass Violence. In People Building Peace: 35 Inspiring Stories from Around the World, 46–57. Utrecht: European Centre for Conflict Prevention.Google Scholar
  49. Press Association. 2013. Northern Ireland Coalition Divided over Maze Prison Peace Centre (Online). Guardian, August 15, 2013.
  50. Preston, Allan. 2016. Four Victims of the Troubles Die Waiting on Pension Since 2011 (Online). Belfast Telegraph, November 22, 2016.
  51. Quinney, Richard. 1972. Who Is the Victim? Criminology 10 (3): 314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Selimovic, Johanna Mannergren. 2010. Perpetrators and Victims: Local Responses to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Focaal-Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 57: 50–61.Google Scholar
  53. Shirlow, Peter, Brian Graham, and Kieran McEvoy. 2008. Former Political Prisoners and Conflict Transformation. In A Sustainable Peace? Research as a Contribution to Peace-Building in Northern Ireland, 65–80. Belfast: Community Relations Council.Google Scholar
  54. Smyth, Marie. 2003. Putting the Past in Its Place: Issues of Victimhood and Reconciliation in Northern Ireland’s Peace Process. In Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice after Civil Conflict, ed. Nigel Biggar, 125–153. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2006. Lost Lives: Victims and the Construction of ‘Victimhood’ in Northern Ireland. In A Farewell to Arms? Beyond the Good Friday Agreement, ed. M. Cox, Adrien Guelke, and F. Stephan, 6–23. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 2012. The Needs of Individuals and Their Families Injured as a Result of the Troubles in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Wave Trauma Centre.Google Scholar
  57. Ulster Unionist Party. 2011. Victims Charter. Belfast: Ulster Unionist Party.Google Scholar
  58. “Victims: Pensions.” They Work For You. 2015.
  59. Walklate, Sandra. 2007. Imagining the Victim of Crime. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah E. Jankowitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Irish StudiesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations