Advertisement

The Social Construction of Victimhood and Complex Victims

  • Sarah E. Jankowitz
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict book series (PSCAC)

Abstract

The victim label is constructed and applied subjectively and defined within specific socio-structural contexts. In conflict and transition, the archetypal image of the innocent, moral, and deserving victim constructed opposite the wicked perpetrator is reinforced in transitional justice mechanisms and policies. Such constructions often do not reflect the realities of human experience, and a growing scholarship on complex victims challenges simplistic portrayals of victims as always separate and mutually exclusive from perpetrators. This chapter explores narratives of victimhood in Northern Ireland which fracture narrow constructions of the victim. It similarly considers complex responsibility, engaging with ambiguities of responsibility in conflict before addressing the limitations of complex victimhood in cynical claims to victim status as a means to obscure responsibility.

Keywords

Victims Innocence Victimology Perpetrators Complex victims 

References

  1. Bar-Tal, Daniel. 2003. Collective Memory of Physical Violence: Its Contribution to the Culture of Violence. In The Role of Memory in Ethnic Conflict, ed. E. Cairns and M.D. Roe, 77–93. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Tal, Daniel, Lily Chernyak-Hai, Noa Schori, and Ayelet Gundar. 2009. A Sense of Self-Perceived Collective Victimhood in Intractable Conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross 91 (874): 229–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bloomfield, David. 2006. On Good Terms: Clarifying Reconciliation. Report No. 14. http://www.berghof-center.org.
  5. Borer, Tristan Anne. 2003. A Taxonomy of Victims and Perpetrators: Human Rights and Reconciliation in South Africa. Human Rights Quarterly 25 (4): 1088–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bottoms, A. 1983. Neglected Features of the Contemporary Penal System. In The Power to Punish, ed. David Garland and P. Young, 166–202. London: Heinmann.Google Scholar
  7. Bouris, Erica. 2007. Complex Political Victims. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, John D. 2010. Peace Processes: A Sociological Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bryson, Anna. 2016. Victims, Violence and Voice: Transitional Justice, Oral History and Dealing with the Past. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 39 (2): 299–353.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Christie, Nils. 1986. The Ideal Victim. In From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System, ed. Ezzat A. Fattah, 17–30. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, Stanley. 2001. States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Crocker, David. 2003. Reckoning with Past Wrongs: A Normative Framework. In Dilemmas of Reconciliation: Cases and Concepts, ed. C. Prager and T. Govier, 39–63. Waterloo: ON: Wilfrid Laurier UP.Google Scholar
  14. Ferguson, Neil, Mark Burgess, and Ian Hollywood. 2010. Who Are the Victims? Victimhood Experiences in Postagreement Northern Ireland. Political Psychology 31 (6): 857–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodey, Jo. 2005. Victims and Victimology: Research, Policy and Practice. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Govier, Trudy. 2006. Taking Wrongs Seriously: Acknowledgement, Reconciliation and the Politics of Sustainable Peace. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  17. Hamber, Brandon. 1998. Remembering to Forget: Issues to Consider When Establishing Structures for Dealing with the Past. In Past Imperfect: Dealing with the Past in Northern Ireland and Societies in Transition, ed. Brandon Hamber, 56–78. Derry/Londonderry: INCORE.Google Scholar
  18. von Hentig, Hans. 1948. The Criminal and His Victim: Studies in the Sociobiology of Crime. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Holstein, James A., and Gale Miller. 1990. Rethinking Victimization: An Interactional Approach to Victimology. Symbolic Interaction 13 (1): 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huyse, Luc. 2003a. Justice. In Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook, ed. David Bloomfield, Teresa Barnes, and Luc Huyse, 97–115. Stockholm: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2003b. Offenders. In Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook, ed. David Bloomfield, Teresa Barnes, and Luc Huyse, 67–76. Stockholm: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2003c. Victims. In Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook, ed. David Bloomfield, Teresa Barnes, and Luc Huyse, 53–66. Stockholm: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
  23. Jankowitz, Sarah. 2017. Sociopolitical Implications of Exclusive, Intergroup Perceptions of Victims in Societies Emerging from Conflict. Peacebuilding 5 (3): 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawther, Cheryl. 2014a. The Construction and Politicisation of Victimhood. In Victims of Terrorism: A Comparative and Interdisciplinary Study, ed. Orla Lynch and Jason Argomaniz, 10–30. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2014b. Truth, Denial and Transition: Northern Ireland and the Contested Past. Oxford University Press: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  26. Liebrucks, Alexander. 2001. The Concept of Social Construction. Theory & Psychology 11 (3): 363–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynch, Hazlett J.E. 1999. On the Road to Recovery: Practical Help for the Innocent Victims of the N.I. Conflict as They Seek to Recover from Their Trauma. Magherafelt: Victim Care Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Mani, Rama. 2002. Beyond Retribution: Seeking Justice in the Shadows of War. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mawby, R.I., and Sandra Walklate. 1994. Critical Victimology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  30. McAlinden, Anne Marie. 2014. Deconstructing Victim and Offender Identites in Discourses on Child Sexual Abuse. British Journal of Criminology 54 (2): 180–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McClelland, Roy. 2003. Society and Scapegoats. In Recognition & Reckoning: The Way Ahead on Victims Issues. Report No. 15, ed. Brandon Hamber and Robin Wilson, 56–66. Belfast: Democratic Dialogue.Google Scholar
  32. McEvoy, Kieran, and Kirsten McConnachie. 2013. Victims and Transitional Justice: Voice, Agency and Blame. Social & Legal Studies 22: 489–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McWilliams, Monica. 1997. Violence against Women and Political Conflict: The Northern Ireland Experience. Critical Criminology 8 (1): 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mendelsohn, Ben. 1956. Une Nouvelle Branche de La Science Bio-Psychosociale: La Victimologie. Revue International de Criminologie et de Police Technique 10: 782–789.Google Scholar
  35. Meredith, Valerie M. 2009. Victim Identity and Respect for Human Dignity: A Terminological Analysis. International Review of the Red Cross 91 (874): 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History After Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Moffett, Luke. 2014. Navigating Complex Identities of Victim-Perpetrators in Reparation Mechanisms. Queen’s University Belfast Law Research Paper No. 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2494759.
  38. Moon, Claire. 2008. Narrating Political Reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  39. Morrissey, Mike, and Marie Smyth. 2002. Northern Ireland after the Good Friday Agreement: Victims, Grievance and Blame. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  40. Prager, Carol A.L. 2003. Aspects of Understanding and Judging Mass Human Rights Abuses. In Dilemmas of Reconciliation: Cases and Concepts, ed. Carol A.L. Prager and Trudy Govier, 197–219. Waterloo: ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Quinney, Richard. 1972. Who Is the Victim? Criminology 10 (3): 314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rigby, Andrew. 2001. Justice and Reconciliation: After the Violence. London: L. Rienner.Google Scholar
  43. Rock, Paul. 2002. On Becoming a Victim. In New Visions of Crime Victims, ed. Carolyn Hoyle and Richard Wilson, 1–22. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Schwöbel-Patel, Christine. 2016. Spectacle in International Criminal Law: The Fundraising Image of Victimhood. London Review of International Law 4 (2): 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Selimovic, Johanna Mannergren. 2010. Perpetrators and Victims: Local Responses to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Focaal-Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 57: 50–61.Google Scholar
  46. Smyth, Marie. 2003. Putting the Past in Its Place: Issues of Victimhood and Reconciliation in Northern Ireland’s Peace Process. In Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice after Civil Conflict, ed. Nigel Biggar, 125–153. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2007. Truth Recovery and Justice after Conflict: Managing Violent Pasts. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Viano, Emilio C. 1989. Victimology Today: Major Issues in Research and Policy. In Crime and Its Victims: International Research and Public Policy Issues, ed. Emilio C. Viano, 3–13. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
  49. Walklate, Sandra. 2007. Imagining the Victim of Crime. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah E. Jankowitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Irish StudiesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations