Who Are the Policymakers and What Are Their Interests?
Political actors and their interests are significant to policymaking. The chapter gives an overview of the most relevant political actors in public health. But the context of policymaking goes beyond visible political actors. Hence, in a second step the chapter shows which role scientific expertise plays and in what manner it plays this role. The way in which scientific expertise is produced and applied to policymaking by different actors is extremely important in order to understand agenda-setting, the hierarchy of specific policies in public health and ways of implementing those policies in different contexts. This chapter highlights and explains the high degree of complexity that characterises the relationship between policymakers and epistemic authority.
KeywordsPolicymaking Scientific expertise Epistemic authority Stakeholders
- Boseley, S. (2003). WHO ‘Infiltrated by food industry’. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/jan/09/foodanddrink. Last accessed 4 Mar 2018.
- Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Davies, S. (2010). Global politics of health. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., et al. (2003). Science in the modern world polity. Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fafard, P., & Hoffman, S. (2018). Rethinking knowledge translation for public health policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/ep/pre-prints/content-ppevidpol1700028r3
- Gieryn, T. F. (1998). Cultural boundaries of science. Credibility on the line. Chicago/London: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Gilliam, C. (2017). Whitewash. The story of a weed killer, cancer, and the corruption of science. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Grimm, H.-U. (2017). Information-domination in the European food industry: Focus on Germany. In G. Steier & K. K. Patel (Eds.), International food law and policy (pp. 3–30). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hendrickx, K. (2017). Working imagination along the food-drug divide. In G. Verschraegen, F. Vandermoere, L. Braeckmans, et al. (Eds.), Imagined futures in science, technology, and society. Oxon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- ILSI. (2016a). 2015 Member and Supporting Companies. Available at: http://ilsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Members.pdf. Last accessed 3 Mar 2018.
- ILSI. (2016b). Code of ethics and organizational standards of conduct. Available at: http://ilsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ILSICodeofEthicsSofC2009.pdf. Last accessed 3 Mar 2018.
- ILSI. (2016c). The role and activities of ILSI Europe. Available at: http://ilsi.org/europe/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/05/ILSI-FREQUENTLY-ASKED-QUESTIONS.pdf. Last accessed 3 Mar 2018.
- ILSI. (2018a). Mission and operating principles. Available at: http://ilsi.org/about/mission/
- ILSI. (2018b). Status of the new activity on ‘consumer behaviour determinants’. Available at: http://ilsi.eu/emerging-issues/. Last accessed 3 Mar 2018.
- Nestle, M. (2002). Food politics: How the food industry influences nutrition and health (Revised ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Quack, S. (2016). Expertise and authority in transnational governance. In R. Cotterrell & M. Del Mar (Eds.), Authority in transnational legal theory. Theorising across disciplines. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Schattschneider, E. E. (1961). The semisovereign people, A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Stone, D. (2012). Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The private-public policy Nexus in the global Agora. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Strassheim, H. (2015). Politics and policy expertise: Towards a political epistemology. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 319–340). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Strassheim, H. (2017a). Behavioural expertise and regulatory power in Europe. In M. Lee, A. de Ruiter, & M. Weimer (Eds.), Regulating risks in the European Union (pp. 143–163). Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (1978 ). Economy and society. An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (2015 ). Science as a vocation. In P. Lassmann, I. Velody, & H. Martins (Eds.), Max Weber’s ‘Science as a vocation’. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Youde, J. R. (2012). Global health governance. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory – A Journal of International Politics, Law and Philosophy, 4(1), 69–106.Google Scholar