Advertisement

Introduction

  • Michael J. Crowe
Chapter

Abstract

Because the central claim in this book is that Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes stories exhibit in many cases the pattern of what is known as a Gestalt shift, the book opens with a discussion of the nature and significance of Gestalt shifts. The term Gestalt shift is defined and illustrated and provides information on the development of this pattern of conceptual change. Crowe traces the history of the idea of a Gestalt shift, giving special attention to its use in Thomas Kuhn’s exceptionally influential book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962). In this context, Crowe discusses the idea of a category mistake and of a Gestalt shift point, but he focuses on the significance of Kuhn’s treatment of this idea and other ideas put forth by Kuhn on conceptual change. This chapter ends with a sketch of the overall structure of the book.

Bibliography

Printed Sources

  1. Baggett, David. “Sherlock Holmes as Epistemologist,” The Philosophy of Sherlock Holmes, ed. Philip Tallon and David Baggett (University Press of Kentucky, 2012).Google Scholar
  2. Boring, Edwin G. “A New Ambiguous Figure,” American Journal of Psychology, 42 (1930), 444–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brugger, Peter and Susan Brugger. “The Easter Bunny in October: Is It Disguised as a Duck?” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76 (1993), 577–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brugger, Peter. “One Hundred Years of an Ambiguous Figure: Happy Birthday, Duck/Rabbit!” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89 (1999), 973–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Covey, Stephen R. The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989).Google Scholar
  6. DesAutels, Peggy. “Gestalt Shifts in Moral Perception,” in Larry May, Marilyn Friedman, and Andy Clark eds., Mind and Morals (Bradford/MIT Press, 1996), 129–143.
  7. Doyle, Arthur Conan. Annotated Sherlock Holmes: The Four Novels and the Fifty-Six Short Stories Complete, annotated by William S. Baring-Gould, 2nd ed., 2 vols. (New York: C. N. Potter, 1975).Google Scholar
  8. Doyle, Arthur Conan. Memories and Adventures and Western Wanderings (Newcastle on Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
  9. Doyle, Arthur Conan. The Complete Sherlock Holmes, 2 vols. (New York: Doubleday, 1953).Google Scholar
  10. Eco, Umberto and Thomas A. Sebeok (eds.). The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (Advances in Semiotics), (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, c. 1983).
  11. Frank, Lawrence. Victorian Detective Fiction and the Nature of Evidence (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanson, Norwood Russell. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Science (Cambridge University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
  13. Hunt, Morton. The Story of Psychology (New York: Doubleday, 1993).Google Scholar
  14. Jastrow, Joseph. “The Mind’s Eye,” Popular Science Monthly, 54 (1899), 299–312.Google Scholar
  15. Jastrow, Joseph. Fact and Fable in Psychology (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1900).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kerr, Douglas. Conan Doyle: Writing, Profession, and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
  17. Kuhn, Thomas. “Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery,” Historical Conceptions of Psychology, ed. Mary Henle, Julian Jaynes, and John J. Sullivan (New York: Springer, 1973), 3–12.Google Scholar
  18. Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  19. Miller, Russell. Adventures of Arthur Conan Doyle: A Biography (New York: Thomas Dunne Books: St. Martin’s Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  20. Necker, Louis Albert. “Observations on Some Remarkable Optical Phaenomena Seen in Switzerland; and on an Optical Phaenomenon Which Occurs on Viewing a Figure of a Crystal or Geometrical Solid,” London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1 (5) (1832), 329–337.Google Scholar
  21. Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (New York: Harper and Row, 1964).Google Scholar
  22. Stashower, Daniel. Teller of Tales: The Life of Arthur Conan Doyle (New york: Henry Holt, 1999).Google Scholar
  23. Thagard, Paul. Conceptual Revolutions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  24. Truss, Lynne. Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation (New York: Gotham Books, 2006).Google Scholar
  25. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations, trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe, 2nd ed. (Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Internet References

  1. “7H15 M3554G3 53RV35 7O PR0V3 H0W 0UR M1ND5”.Google Scholar
  2. “Duck-Rabbit Illusion.” See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbit–duck_illusion. Viewed 22 February 2015.
  3. “Rubin Did Not Discover the Rubin Vase,” on the internet at http://figuresambigues.free.fr/ArticlesImage/rubin1.html#axzz5CcbaTVFn. Viewed 14 April 2018.
  4. Bird, Alexander. “Thomas Kuhn,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/thomas-kuhn/. Viewed 23 February 2015.
  5. Fliegende Blätter (October 23, 1892), 147. Viewed 14 April 2018.Google Scholar
  6. Keats, John. “On First Looking into Chapman’s Homer,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_First_Looking_into_Chapman%27s_Homer. Viewed 18 May 2015.
  7. Kihlstrom, John F. “Jospeh Jastrow and His Duck—Or Is It a Rabbit,” http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~Kihlstrm/JastrowDuck.htm. Viewed 3 March 2015.
  8. Naughton, John. “Thomas Kuhn: The Man Who Changed the Way the World Looked at Science,” Manchester Guardian, August 19, 2012. Accessed on May 13, 2015 at http://www.rawstory.com/2012/08/thomas-kuhn-the-man-who-changed-the-way-the-world-looked-at-science/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Crowe
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations