Caesar: The Rise and Dawn of a Humanimalistic Identity
The Planet of the Apes—created by Pierre Boulle in 1963—is a fictional world in which apes are the dominant species while humans have taken their place in the wild. The screen adaptions in 2011 and 2014 tell the story of the genesis of this world, tightly bound up with the biography of Caesar, an ape who not only learns to talk but establishes a humanlike society of apes. With an animal as the protagonist, there seems to be a nonhuman focus. Nevertheless, Caesar cannot really be categorized as an animal, due to his socialization and artificially enhanced cognitive skills. The article introduces Caesars biography as a struggle with his identity to analyse the human-animal relations represented by these movies.
KeywordsAnthropomorphism Humanimal Cinema Identity Planet of the Apes Posthuman
- De Castro, Eduardo Viveiros. “The Notion of Species in History and Anthropology.” In Anicka Yi Jungle Stripe, edited by Susanne Pfeffer, 13–18. Kassel: documenta und Museum Fridericianum GmbH, 2016.Google Scholar
- Daston, Lorraine and Gregg Mitman. Thinking with Animals. New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
- Forrest, Adam. “Andy Serkis Interview: ‘I’ve just completed filming on Star Wars Episode VII’.” http://www.bigissue.com/features/interviews/4619/andy-serkis-interview-ive-just-completed-filming-on-stars-wars-episode-vii. Accessed February 12, 2014.
- Gosling, Sharon, Adam Newell, and Matt Hurwitz. Planet of the Apes: The Art of the Films Dawn of the Planet of the Apes and Rise of the Planet of the Apes. London: Titan Books, 2014.Google Scholar
- Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Assoc. Books, 1991.Google Scholar
- ———. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar
- Hof, Jutta and Volker Sommer. Apes Like Us. Portraits of a Kinship. Mannheim: Edition Panorama, 2010.Google Scholar
- Miles, H. Lyn. “Anthropomorphism, Apes, and Ape Language.” In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, edited by Robert W. Mitchell, Nicholas S. Thompson, and H. Lyn Miles, 383–404. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, Robert W., Nicholas S. Thompson, and H. Lyn Miles. Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, Sandra D. “Anthropomorphism and Cross-Species Modeling.” In Thinking with Animals. New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, edited by Lorraine Daston and Gregg Mitman, 100–117. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
- Powell, Anna. “Growing Your Own: Monsters from the Lab and Molecular Ethics in Posthumanist Film.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television, edited by Míchael Hauskeller, Thomas D. Philbeck, and Curtis D. Carbonell, 77–87. Hampshire, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spada, Emanuela Cenami. “Amorphism, Mechanomorphism and Anthropomorphism.” In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, edited by Robert W. Mitchell, Nicholas S. Thompson, and H. Lyn Miles, 37–49. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar