Advertisement

Online Animal (Auto-)Biographies: What Does It Mean When We “Give Animals a Voice?”

  • Margo DeMello
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature book series (PSAAL)

Abstract

This chapter looks at why and how animals are so prominently featured in social media today, and what the implications are both for those animals and for animals in general. It addresses the ways in which online animals serve as more than just the feline, canine, or porcine face and voice of a human writer, but can work to promote better treatment of animals. This chapter suggests that online animal biographies may create space for a new understanding of animal subjectivity which can lead to real changes for animals. By creating and following animals on social media, we give these animals a social presence which may result in concrete changes for the animals behind the profiles.

Keywords

Social media and animals Animal stories Internet animals Animal memes 

Works Cited

  1. Adams, Carol J. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
  2. ———. Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals. London: A&C Black, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. “A Strange and Wonderful Relation of a Hen that Spake at a Certain Ancient Borough in Staffordshire on the 17th of February being Shrove Tuesday; Together with her Dying Speech.” The Gentleman’s Magazine 19 (1749).Google Scholar
  4. Arluke, Arnold and Clinton Sanders. Regarding Animals. London: Pearson Education, 2010.Google Scholar
  5. Barbauld, Anna Letitia. Poems. London: Joseph Johnson, 1773.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, Susan E. and Margo DeMello. Stories Rabbits Tell: A Natural and Cultural History of a Misunderstood Creature. Hemden, VA: Lantern Books, 2003.Google Scholar
  7. DeMello, Margo. “Identity, Community and Grief: The Role of Bunspace in Human and Rabbit Lives.” In Speaking for Animals: Animal Autobiographical Writing, edited by Margo DeMello, 115–129. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
  8. DiPerna, Paul. “The Web Connector Model: New Implications for Social Change.” Journal of Information Technology Impact 7.1 (2007): 15–20.Google Scholar
  9. Donovan, Josephine. “Tolstoy’s Animals.” Society & Animals 17.1 (2009): 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellison, Nicole B. “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13.1 (2007): 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Free, Amy. “Can ‘Dumb’ be Undone? What the Human Proclivity for Speech Means for Non-Human Animals.” Phd. diss., Canisius College Anthrozoology program, 2015.Google Scholar
  12. Fudge, Erica. Animal. London: Reaktion Books, 2004.Google Scholar
  13. Gardner, R. Allen and Beatrice T. Gardner. “Teaching Sign Language to a Chimpanzee.” Science 165.3894 (1969): 664–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Golbeck, Jennifer. “On the Internet, Everybody Knows you’re a Dog: The Human-Pet Relationship in Online Social Networks.” Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy, April 5–10, 2008.Google Scholar
  15. Herman, Louis M. and Steven N. Austad. “Knowledge Acquisition and Asymmetry Between Language Comprehension and Production: Dolphins and Apes as General Models for Animals.” In Readings in Animal Cognition, edited by Marc Bekoff and Dale Jamieson, 289–306. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. Laforteza, Elaine M. “Cute-ifying Disability: Lil Bub, the Celebrity Cat.” Media/Culture Journal 17.2 (2014). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/784. Accessed September 19, 2017.
  17. Milne, Anne. “The Power of Testimony: The Speaking Animal’s Plea for Understanding in a Selection of Eighteenth-Century British Poetry.” In Speaking for Animals: Animal Autobiographical Writing, edited by Margo DeMello, 163–177. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Patterson, Francine G. “The Gestures of a Gorilla: Language Acquisition in Another Pongid.” Brain and Language 5.1 (1978): 72–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pepperberg, Irene M. The Alex Studies: Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of Grey Parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  20. Sanders, Clinton R. and Arnold Arluke. “Speaking for Dogs.” In The Animals Reader: The Essential Classic and Contemporary Writings, edited by Linda Kalof and Amy Fitzgerald, 63–71. London: Bloomsbury, 2007.Google Scholar
  21. Savage-Rumbaugh, Sue, William Mintz Fields, and Jared Taglialatela. “Ape Consciousness – Human Consciousness: A Perspective Informed by Language and Culture.” American Zoologist 40.6 (2000): 910–921.Google Scholar
  22. Savvides, Nikki. “Speaking for Dogs.” In Speaking for Animals: Animal Autobiographical Writing, edited by Margo DeMello, 231–243. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
  23. Schally, Jennifer and Stanley Couch. “Catster.com: Creating Feline Identities Online.” In Speaking for Animals: Animal Autobiographical Writing, edited by Margo DeMello 103–113. London: Routledge, 2013.
  24. Sewell, Anna. Black Beauty. New York: Scholastic Paperbacks, 1877.Google Scholar
  25. Slobodchikoff, Constantine Nicholas, Bianca S. Perla, and Jennifer L. Verdolin. Prairie Dogs: Communication and Community in an Animal Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  26. Stowe, Harriet Beecher. “Rights of Dumb Animals.” Hearth and Home 1.2 (1869): 24.Google Scholar
  27. Tannen, Deborah. Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. Tiffin, Helen. “Speech of Dumb Beasts.” In Considering Animals: Contemporary Studies in Human-Animal Relations, edited by Carol Freeman, Elizabeth Leane, and Yvette Watt, 137–152. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
  29. Tolstoy, Leo. Collected Shorter Fiction: Volume 1. Translated by Louise Maude and Aylmer Maude. London: Everyman’s Library, 2001.Google Scholar
  30. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
  31. Zuckerman, Ethan. “The Cute Cat Theory of Digital Activism.” Paper presented at the E-Tech Conference, San Diego, California, March 3–6, 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margo DeMello
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Canisius CollegeBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Animals & Society InstituteAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations