Advertisement

Social and Professional Attitudes in the Prevention of Sexual Abuse

  • Craig A. Harper
Chapter
Part of the Sexual Crime book series (SEXCR)

Abstract

The stigmatisation of people with paedophilic sexual interests is a widespread societal issue. However, only a small number of researchers have empirically examined the sources, nature, and effects of such stigmatising views. This chapter first defines the notions of ‘attitudes’ and ‘stigmatisation’, before presenting a critical review of the literature about the stigmatisation in the prevention of sexual abuse. In this review, the sources and effects of stigmatisation are discussed, as are their effects in primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention domains. Opportunities for developing more effective communication strategies about the topic of paedophilia are outlined, with the aim here being to identify opportunities for promoting the primary prevention of child sexual abuse and exploitation. Such topics discussed here include the idea that stigmatisation of people with paedophilic sexual interests could be subsumed into existing human rights legislation, and the growing literature around the rehumanisation of such individuals.

Keywords

Attitudes Paedophilia Sexual orientation Sexual abuse prevention Stigmatisation 

References

  1. Ahlers, C. J., Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., Roll, S., Englert, H., Willich, S. N., Beier, K. M. (2011). How unusual are the contents of paraphilias? Paraphilia-associated sexual arousal patterns in a community-based sample of men. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 1362–1370.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01597.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allardyce, S. (2018, April). Current directions in the prevention of child sexual abuse: The work of Stop it Now! UK. Paper presented at the Safer Living Foundation ‘Prevention in the UK’ conference, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Amelung, T., Kuhle, L. F., Konrad, A., Pauls, A., & Beier, K. M. (2012). Androgen deprivation therapy of self-identifying, help-seeking pedophiles in the Dunkelfeld. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, 176–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.02.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastian, B., Denson, T. F., & Haslam, N. (2013). The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PlosONE, 8, e61842.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061842.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Beech, A. R., & Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E. (2005). Relationship between therapeutic climate and treatment outcome in group-based sexual offender treatment programmes. Sexual Abuse, 17, 127–140.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-005-4600-3.Google Scholar
  6. Beier, K. M., Ahlers, C. J., Döcker, D., Neutze, J., Mundt, I. A., Hupp, E., & Schäfer, G. A. (2009). Can pedophiles be reached for primary prevention of child sexual abuse? First results of the Berlin Project Prevention Dunkelfeld (PPD). The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 851–867.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940903174188.Google Scholar
  7. Beier, K. M., Grundmann, D., Kuhle, L. F., Scherner, G., Konrad, A., & Amelung, T. (2015). The German Dunkelfeld project: A pilot study to prevent child sexual abuse and the use of child abusive images. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 529–542.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beier, K. M., Özdemir, U. C., Schlinzig, E., Groll, A., & Hellenschmidt, T. (2016). “Just dreaming of them”: The Berlin project for primary prevention of child sexual abuse by Juveniles (PPJ). Child Abuse & Neglect, 52, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.12.009.Google Scholar
  9. Bergen, E., Antfolk, J., Jern, P., Alanko, K., & Santtila, P. (2013). Adults’ sexual interest in children: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7, 94–111.Google Scholar
  10. Bernard, F. (1985). Paedophilia: A factual report [English edition]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Enclave Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Hames, C. (2016). “They treat us like human beings” – Experiencing a therapeutic sex offenders prison impact on prisoners and staff and implications for treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60, 371–396.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14553227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cantor, J. M. (2014). “Gold-star” pedophiles in general sex therapy practice. In Y. M. Binik & K. S. Hall (Eds.), Principles and practice of sex therapy (5th ed., pp. 219–234). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Cantor, J. M., & McPhail, I. V. (2016). Non-offending pedophiles. Current Sexual Health Reports, 8, 121–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-016-0076-z.Google Scholar
  14. Collin, L., Reisner, S. L., Tangpricha, V., & Goodman, M. (2016). Prevalence of transgender depends on the “case” definition: A systematic review. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13, 613–626.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.02.001.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dombert, B., Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R., Briken, P., Hoyer, J., Neutze, J., & Osterheider, M. (2016). How common is men’s self-reported sexual interest in prepubescent children? The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 214–223.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1020108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Duwe, G. (2018). Can circles of support and accountability (CoSA) significantly reduce sexual recidivism? Results from a randomized controlled trial in Minnesota. Journal of Experimental Criminology. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9325-7.Google Scholar
  17. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y.-Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1.Google Scholar
  18. Farmer, M., McAlinden, A.-M., & Maruna, S. (2015). Understanding desistance from sexual offending: A thematic review of research findings. Probation Journal, 62, 320–335.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550515600545.Google Scholar
  19. Feelgood, S., & Hoyer, J. (2008). Child molester or paedophile? Sociolegal versus psychopathological classification of sexual offenders against children. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14, 33–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600802133860.Google Scholar
  20. Flentje, A., Heck, N. C., & Cochran, B. N. (2014). Experiences of ex-ex-gay individuals in sexual reorientation therapy: Reasons for seeking treatment, perceived helpfulness and harmfulness of treatment, and post-treatment identification. Journal of Homosexuality, 61, 1242–1268.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.926763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Freund, K., & Kuban, M. (1993). Toward a testable developmental model of pedophilia: The development of erotic age preference. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 315–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(93)90051-6.Google Scholar
  22. Gillespie, S. M., Mitchell, I. J., Fisher, D., & Beech, A. R. (2012). Treating disturbed emotional regulation in sexual offenders: The potential applications of mindful self-regulation and controlled breathing techniques. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 333–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.005.Google Scholar
  23. Göbbels, S., Ward, T., & Willis, G. W. (2012). An integrative theory of desistance from sex offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 453–462.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.003.Google Scholar
  24. Grundmann, D., Krupp, K., Scherner, G., Amelung, T., & Beier, K. M. (2016). Stability of self-reported arousal to sexual fantasies involving children in a clinical sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1153–1162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0729-z.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Harper, C. A., Bartels, R. M., & Hogue, T. E. (2016). Reducing stigma and punitive attitudes toward pedophiles through narrative humanization. Sexual Abuse. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216681561.
  26. Harper, C. A., & Harris, A. J. (2017). Applying moral foundations theory to understanding public views of sexual offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23, 111–123.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1217086.Google Scholar
  27. Harper, C. A., & Hogue, T. E. (2014). A prototype-willingness model of sexual crime discourse in England and Wales. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 53, 511–524.  https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12095.Google Scholar
  28. Harper, C. A., & Hogue, T. E. (2017). Press coverage as a heuristic guide for social decision-making about sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23, 118–134.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1227816.Google Scholar
  29. Harper, C. A., Hogue, T. E., & Bartels, R. M. (2017). Attitudes towards sexual offenders: What do we know, and why are they important. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 201–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.011.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, A. J., & Socia, K. M. (2016). What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the “sex offender” label on public beliefs and opinions. Sexual Abuse, 28, 660–678.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214564391.Google Scholar
  31. Helmus, L., Ó Ciardha, C., & Seto, M. C. (2015). The Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI): Construct, predictive, and incremental validity. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000099.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Herdt, G., & McClintock, M. (2000). The magical age of 10. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 587–606.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002006521067.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hocken, K., & Taylor, J. (2018, April). Compassion-focused therapy: A promising treatment approach to prevent first time sexual offending. Paper presented at the Safer Living Foundation ‘Prevention in the UK’ conference. Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  34. Hogue, T. E. (2015, June). Attitudes to sex offenders. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society’s Division of forensic psychology annual conference. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Höing, M., Petrina, R., Duke, L., Völlm, B., & Vogelvang, B. (2016). Community support for sex offender rehabilitation in Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 13, 491–516.Google Scholar
  36. Houtepan, J. A. B. M., Sijtsema, J. J., & Bogaerts, S. (2016). Being sexually attracted to minors: Sexual development, coping with forbidden feelings, and relieving sexual arousal in self-identified pedophiles. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 42, 48–69.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2015.1061077.Google Scholar
  37. Jahnke, S. (2018). Emotions and cognitions associated with stigma of non-offending pedophilia: A vignette experiment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 363–373.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1073-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jahnke, S. & Hoyer, J. (2013). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: A blind spot in stigma research. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25, 169–184.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2013.795921.Google Scholar
  39. Jahnke, S., Imhoff, R., & Hoyer, J. (2015). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: Two comparative surveys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 21–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-0140312-4.
  40. Jahnke, S., Schmidt, A. F., Geradt, M., & Hoyer, J. (2015). Stigma-related stress and its correlates among men with pedophilic sexual interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2173–2187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0503-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaplan, M. (2015). Taking pedophilia seriously. Washington and Lee Law Review, 72, 75–170.Google Scholar
  42. King, L. L., & Roberts, J. J. (2017). The complexity of public attitudes toward sex crimes. Victims & Offenders, 12, 71–89.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1005266.Google Scholar
  43. Marshall, W. L., Barbaree, H. E., & Eccles, A. (1991). Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 323–336.  https://doi.org/10.1177/088626091006003005.Google Scholar
  44. McCartan, K. (2010). Media constructions and reactions to, paedophilia in modern society. In K. Harrison (Ed.), Managing high-risk sex offenders in the community: Risk management, treatment and social responsibilities (pp. 248–268). Abingdon, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Nunes, K. L., Petterson, C., Hermann, C. A., Looman, J., & Spape, J. (2016). Does change on the MOLEST and RAPE scales predict sexual recidivism? Sexual Abuse, 28, 427–447.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214540725.Google Scholar
  46. Office for National Statistics. (2017). Sexual identity, UK: 2016. London: Author.Google Scholar
  47. Richards, K., & McCartan, K. (2018). Public views about reintegrating child sex offenders via Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA): A qualitative analysis. Deviant Behavior, 38, 400–416.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1304800.Google Scholar
  48. Schmidt, A. F., Mokros, A., & Banse, R. (2013). Is pedophilic sexual preference continuous? A taxometric analysis based on direct and indirect measures. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1146–1153.  https://doi.org/10.1037/A0033326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Seto, M. C. (2009). Pedophilia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 391–407.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153618.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Seto, M. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 231–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9882-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., & Blanchard, R. (2000). The discriminative validity of a phallometric test for pedophilic interests among adolescent sex offenders against children. Psychological Assessment, 12, 319–327.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.3.319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilson, R., Picheca, J., & Prinzo, M. (2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of professionally-facilitated volunteerism in the community-based management of high-risk sexual offenders: Part one: Effects on participants and stakeholders. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 289–302.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00475.x.Google Scholar
  53. Wilson, R. J., Cortoni, F., & McWhinnie, A. J. (2009). Circles of support & accountability: A Canadian national replication of outcome findings. Sexual Abuse, 21, 412–430.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063209347724.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations