Advertisement

Does This Child Have Autism? Exploring Team Discussions When Diagnosing Autistic Spectrum Disorder

  • Nicole ParishEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Language of Mental Health book series (TLMH)

Abstract

Parish reports a study of the social organisation of team meetings that decide whether to give a child a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There is currently little known about the use of multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, despite the strong recommendations for such an approach to be used when assessing for ASD. Three meetings from two MDTs were recorded, capturing the discussion of 16 children. Conversation analysis revealed three practices that encouraged information to be elaborated upon, even in time-pressured meetings. These ‘opened up’ the team discussions to consider different possible explanations for a child’s presentation. Parish concludes by discussing the clinical implications of these practices, including whether they could reduce the risk of over-diagnosing ASD.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Firstly, I would like to thank the two teams that took part in this study. I appreciate how exposing it must have been to have someone record their work and they demonstrated great practices in collaborative team working. Secondly, I would like to thank my supervisors: Cordet Smart for her encouragement and enthusiasm throughout, and Jacqui Stedmon for her calming and reflective influence. Finally, I would also like to say a big thank you to Dr Lindsay Aikman for all of your help and support.

References

  1. Arber, A. (2007). “Pain talk” in hospice and palliative care team meetings: An ethnography. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 916–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartolo, P. A., Dockrell, J., & Lunt, I. (2001). Naturalistic decision-making task processes in multiprofessional assessment of disability. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu, S., & Parry, P. (2013). The autism spectrum disorder ‘epidemic’: Need for biopsychosocial formulation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 1116–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Croker, A, Loftus, S., & Higgs, J. (2008). Multidisciplinary clinical decision making. In Clinical reasoning in the health professions (pp. 291–298). Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann. Google Scholar
  5. Dew, K., Stubbe, M., Signal, L., Stairmand, J., Dennett, E., Koea J., …, Ellison-Loschmann, L. (2014) Cancer care decision making in multidisciplinary meetings. Qualitative Health Research, 25(3), 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Falkmer, T., Anderson, K., Falkmer, M., & Horlin, C. (2013). Diagnostic procedures in autism spectrum disorders: A systematic literature review. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 22, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, 125, 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kidger, J., Murdoch, J., Donovan, J. L., & Blazeby, J. M. (2009). Clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: A qualitative study. An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 116, 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Le Couteur, A. (2003). National Autism Plan for Children (NAPC): Plan for the identification, assessment, diagnosis and access to early interventions for pre-school and primary school aged children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). London: National Autistic Society.Google Scholar
  10. McHoul, A., & Rapley, M. (2005). A case of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis: Sir Karl and Francis B. slug it out on the consulting room floor. Discourse & Society, 16, 419–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mendel, R., Traut-Mattausch, E., Jonas, E., Leucht, S., Kane, J. M., Maino, K., …, Hamann J. (2011). Confirmation bias: Why psychiatrists stick to wrong preliminary diagnoses. Psychological Medicine, 41, 2651–2659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moran, H. (2010). Clinical observations of the differences between children on the autism spectrum and those with attachment problems: The Coventry Grid. Good Autism Practice (GAP), 11, 46–59.Google Scholar
  13. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2011). Autism diagnosis in children and young people: Recognition, referral and diagnosis of children and young people on the autism spectrum. In NICE clinical guidance (p. 128). Manchester: NICE. Google Scholar
  14. Palmer, E., Ketteridge, C., Parr, J. R., Baird, G., & Le Couteur, A. (2011). Autism spectrum disorder diagnostic assessments: Improvements since publication of the National Autism Plan for Children. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 96, 473–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: Addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11, 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sarkar, S., Arora, S., Lamb, B. W., Green, J. S., Sevdalis, N., & Darzi, A. (2014). Case review in urology multidisciplinary team meetings: What members think of its functioning. Journal of Clinical Urology, 7, 394–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Silverman, D., & Peräkylä, A. (1990). AIDS counselling: The interactional organisation of talk about ‘delicate’ issues. Sociology of Health & Illness, 12, 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Westman Andersson G., Miniscalco, C., & Gillberg, C. (2013). Autism in preschoolers: Does individual clinician’s first visit diagnosis agree with final comprehensive diagnosis? The Scientific World Journal, 2013, 1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Child Health PsychologyCardiff and Vale University Health BoardCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations