Advertisement

Location Privacy-Preserving Applications and Services

  • Ioannis Boutsis
  • Vana KalogerakiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Mobile location-based applications have recently prevailed due to the massive growth of the mobile devices and the mobile network. Such applications give the opportunity to the users to share content with the community which is coupled with their current geographical location. However, sharing such information might have serious privacy implications as an adversary might monitor the system and use such information to expose sensitive user information including user mobility traces and sensitive locations. This problem has led both the research community and the commercial mobile applications to develop several solutions to handle these privacy implications so as to enable users to disclose content without compromising their privacy. This chapter provides a survey of the state-of-the-art location-based mobile applications, describes the privacy implications that arise from contributing information in such applications and the respective existing countermeasures to deal with the privacy preservation issues. Furthermore, we describe our experiences from deploying a real-world location-based application that aims to allow the user contribute content and protect the user’s privacy.

References

  1. 1.
    P. K. Agarwal, S. Har-Peled, and K. R. Varadarajan. Geometric approximation via coresets. Combinatorial and computational geometry, 52:1–30, 2005.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. Privacy-preserving data mining. In SIGMOD, Dallas, Texas, United States, May 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Bettini and D. Riboni. Privacy protection in pervasive systems: State of the art and technical challenges. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 17:159–174, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. Boutsis and V. Kalogeraki. Crowdalert: a mobile app for event reporting and user alerting in real-time. In UbiComp, Heidelberg, Germany, 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Boutsis and V. Kalogeraki. Location privacy for crowdsourcing applications. In UbiComp, Heidelberg, Germany, 2016.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.-Y. Chow, M. F. Mokbel, and W. G. Aref. Casper*: Query processing for location services without compromising privacy. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 34(4):24, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y.-A. de Montjoye, C. A. Hidalgo, M. Verleysen, and V. D. Blondel. Unique in the crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Scientific reports, 3, 2013.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Dong, T. Gu, X. Tao, and J. Lu. Complete bipartite anonymity: Confusing anonymous mobility traces for location privacy. In ICPADS, pages 205–212, Singapore, December 2014.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Fawaz and K. G. Shin. Location privacy protection for smartphone users. In CCS, pages 239–250, Scottsdale, Arizona,, november 2014.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Gambs, M.-O. Killijian, and M. Núñez del Prado Cortez. De-anonymization attack on geolocated data. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 80(8):1597–1614, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Gao, J. Ma, W. Shi, G. Zhan, and C. Sun. Trpf: A trajectory privacy-preserving framework for participatory sensing. Information Forensics and Security, IEEE Transactions on, 8(6):874–887, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Gkoulalas-Divanis and V. S. Verykios. A privacy-aware trajectory tracking query engine. SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 10(1):40–49, May 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Higuchi, P. Martin, S. Chakraborty, and M. Srivastava. AnonyCast: privacy-preserving location distribution for anonymous crowd tracking systems. In UbiComp, pages 1119–1130, Osaka, Japan, Sep 2015.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Hoh and M. Gruteser. Protecting location privacy through path confusion. In SECURECOMM, Athens, Greece, September 2005.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C.-C. Hung, W.-C. Peng, and W.-C. Lee. Clustering and aggregating clues of trajectories for mining trajectory patterns and routes. The VLDB Journal, pages 1–24, 2011.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Kapadia, N. Triandopoulos, C. Cornelius, D. Peebles, and D. Kotz. Anonysense: Opportunistic and privacy-preserving context collection. In Pervasive Computing, pages 280–297. Sydney, Australia, May 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Mascetti, L. Bertolaja, and C. Bettini. Safebox: adaptable spatio-temporal generalization for location privacy protection. Transactions on Data Privacy, 7(2):131–163, 2014.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Mascetti, D. Freni, C. Bettini, X. S. Wang, and S. Jajodia. Privacy in geo-social networks: proximity notification with untrusted service providers and curious buddies. The VLDB Journal, 20(4):541–566, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Niu, Q. Li, X. Zhu, G. Cao, and H. Li. Achieving k-anonymity in privacy-aware location-based services. In INFOCOM, pages 754–762, Toronto, CA, April 2014.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. Pelekis, A. Gkoulalas-Divanis, M. Vodas, D. Kopanaki, and Y. Theodoridis. Privacy-aware querying over sensitive trajectory data. In CIKM, Glasgow, Scotland, October 2011.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. Sadeh, J. Hong, L. Cranor, I. Fette, P. Kelley, M. Prabaker, and J. Rao. Understanding and capturing people’s privacy policies in a mobile social networking application. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(6):401–412, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., 5(1):3–55, 2001.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Shao, R. Lu, and X. Lin. Fine: A fine-grained privacy-preserving location-based service framework for mobile devices. In INFOCOM, pages 244–252, Toronto, CA, April 2014.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Terrovitis and N. Mamoulis. Privacy preservation in the publication of trajectories. In MDM, Beijing, China, April 2008.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    I. J. Vergara-Laurens, D. Mendez, and M. A. Labrador. Privacy, quality of information, and energy consumption in participatory sensing systems. In PerCom, pages 199–207, Budapest, Hungary, March 2014.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    S. Wilson, J. Cranshaw, N. Sadeh, A. Acquisti, L. F. Cranor, J. Springfield, S. Y. Jeong, and A. Balasubramanian. Privacy manipulation and acclimation in a location sharing application. In UbiComp, pages 549–558, Zurich, CH, September 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Athens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations