Advertisement

Electoral Systems and Political Reforms: Portugal in Comparative Perspective

  • André Freire
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter reflects on some of the fundamental problems associated with electoral reform or, more generally, with the choice of electoral systems. Different types of electoral system tend to have different underlying fundamental goals. To achieve the objectives underlying each electoral system different instrumental solutions are employed. The different fundamental objectives the various electoral systems target, as well as the differentiated solutions they adopt to achieve them, are not easily reconcilable, at least fully, and therefore there must always be some form of trade-off. However, some solutions seek precisely to reconcile goals that are to some extent contradictory. Considering the performance of Portuguese electoral system in terms of proportionality, cabinet stability and quality of representation (i.e. the pattern of relationships between the voters, parties and candidates/members of parliament), as well as the necessary trade-off in each and every choice, the chapter reflects on the aspects of the electoral system that need more or less of reforms and how to reconcile the maintenance of proportionality, the strengthening of executive stability and increasing the intensity of links between voters and deputies.

References

  1. Anderson, C. J. (2000). Economic Voting and Political Context. Electoral Studies, 19(2/3), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arter, D. (2006). Democracy in Scandinavia: Consensual, Majoritarian or Mixed? Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blais, A., & Dobrzynska, A. (1998). Turnout in Electoral Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 33, 239–261.Google Scholar
  5. Curtice, J., & Shively, P. (2003). Quem nos representa melhor? Um deputado ou vários? Análise Social, 167, 361–386.Google Scholar
  6. Duverger, M. (1951). Os Partidos Políticos. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara.Google Scholar
  7. Eneyedi, Z., & Todosijevic, B. (2009). Adversarial Politics, Civic Virtues and Partisanship in Eastern and Western Europe. In J. Bartle & P. Belluci (Eds.), Political Parties and Partisanship: Social Identity and Political Attitudes (pp. 142–161). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Franklin, M. (2002). The Dynamics of Electoral Participation. In L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi, & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting (pp. 148–168). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Freire, A. (2006). Esquerda e Direita na Política Europeia: Portugal, Espanha e Grécia em Perspectiva Comparada. Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
  10. Freire, A. (2009). Mudança do sistema partidário em Portugal, 1974–2009: O papel dos factores políticos, sociais e ideológicos. In M. A. Cruz (Ed.), Eleições e Sistemas Eleitorais: Perspectivas Históricas e Políticas. Porto: Universidade do Porto Editorial.Google Scholar
  11. Freire, A. (2010). Reformas eleitorais: Objetivos, soluções, efeitos prováveis e trade-offs necessários. Eleições, 12, 25–60.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, A. (2011). Constituição e sistema político-eleitoral. In N. Garoupa, M. P. Maduro, P. Magalhães, & J. Tavares (Eds.), A Constituição Revista (pp. 73–79). Lisbon: Editora Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos. Available at http://www.ffms.pt/upload/docs/0793dd50-3e18-478a-be1f-42b179181dde.pdf.
  13. Freire, A. (2013). Crise e transformação nas esquerdas europeias, antes e depois do fim dos regimes do “socialismo realmente existente” (1989–1991). In P. A. Oliveira (Ed.), O Fim da URSS, a Nova Rússia e a Crise das Esquerdas (pp. 247–302). Lisbon: FMS-IHC-UNL/Colibri.Google Scholar
  14. Freire, A. (2014, September 29). Crise das democracias e reformas dos sistemas eleitorais, opinion article in the Portuguese daily newspaper. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2014/09/24/politica/opiniao/a-crise-das-democracias-e-a-reforma-dos-sistemas-eleitorais-1670588.
  15. Freire, A. (2015). Left-Right Ideology as a Dimension of Identification and as a Dimension of Competition. Journal of Political Ideologies, 20(1), 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freire, A. (2017). Para lá da «Geringonça» : O Governo de Esquerdas em Portugal e na Europa. Lisbon: Contraponto.Google Scholar
  17. Freire, A. (2018). Sistemas eleitorais e reformas políticas: Portugal em perspetiva comparada. In C. P. Teixeira (Ed.), O Sistema Político Português: Uma Perspetiva Comparada (pp. 155–186). Cascais: Principia.Google Scholar
  18. Freire, A., & Belchior, A. (2013). Ideological Representation in Portugal: Mps-Electors Linkages in Terms of Left-Right Placement and Substantive Meaning. Journal of Legislative Studies, 19(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freire, A., & Lobo, M. C. (2005). Economics, Ideology and Vote: Southern Europe, 1985–2000. European Journal of Political Research, 44(4), 493–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freire, A., & Meirinho, M. (2012). Institutional Reform in Portugal: From the Perspective of Deputies and Voters’ Perspectives. Pôle Sud – Revue de Science Politique, 36, 107–125.Google Scholar
  21. Freire, A., & Papp, Z. (2014). Electoral Rules and Legislators’ Personal Vote-Seeking. In K. Deschouwer & S. Depaw (Eds.), Representing the People: A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substrate Parliaments (pp. 87–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Freire, A., & Santana-Pereira, J. (2016). The Portuguese National Election of 2015: From Austerity to the Fall of the Portuguese “Berlin Wall”. Pôle Sud – Revue de Science Politique, 44(1), 142–147.Google Scholar
  23. Freire, A., Meirinho, M., & Moreira, D. (2008). Para uma Melhoria da Qualidade da Representação: A Reforma do Sistema Eleitoral. Lisbon: Sextante.Google Scholar
  24. Gallagher, M., & Mitchell, P. (2008). The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Grossman, E., & Sauger, N. (2007). Introduction aux Systèmes Politiques Nationaux de l’UE. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.Google Scholar
  26. Jackman, R. W. (1987). Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. American Political Science Review, 81, 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackman, R. W., & Miller, R. A. (1998). Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies During the 1980s. In P. Norris (Ed.), Elections and Voting Behaviour: New Challenges, New Perspectives (pp. 305–330). Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  28. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lijphart, A. (2006). The Case for Power Sharing. In L. Diamond & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), Electoral Systems and Democracy (pp. 42–55). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lijphart, A. (2007). Thinking About Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lobo, M. C. (2008, December 11). A reforma do sistema eleitoral, opinion article included in the Portuguese newspaper. Jornal de Negócios. https://www.jornaldenegocios.pt/opiniao/detalhe/a_reforma_do_sistema_eleitoral.
  32. Lopes, F. F., & Freire, A. (2002). Partidos Políticos e Sistemas Eleitorais: Uma Introdução. Oeiras: Celta.Google Scholar
  33. March, L. (2008). Contemporary Far Left Parties in Europe: From Marxism to the Mainstream? Fundação Friedrich Ebert, 11/2008. Available at library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/ipa/05818.pdf.
  34. March, L., & Freire, A. (2012). A Esquerda Radical em Portugal e na Europa: Marxismo, Mainstream ou Marginalidade? Porto: Quid Novi.Google Scholar
  35. Massicotte, L., & Blais, A. (1999). Mixed Electoral Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Survey. Electoral Studies, 18(3), 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meirinho, M. (2004). Participação Política e Democracia: O Caso Português 1976–2000. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas.Google Scholar
  37. Moreira, V. (2008a, December 16). Uma proposta falhada. Público.Google Scholar
  38. Moreira, V. (2008b, December 23). Mais defeitos do que virtudes. Público.Google Scholar
  39. Nohlen, D. (1984). Two Incompatible Principles of Representation. In A. Lijphart & B. Großman (Eds.), Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives (pp. 83–90). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  40. Nohlen, D. (1995). Sistemas Electorales y Systemas de Partidos. Mexico City: Fondo e Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  41. Nohlen, D. (2007). Os Sistemas Eleitorais: O Contexto faz a Diferença. Lisbon: Horizonte.Google Scholar
  42. Ortega, C. (2004). Los Sistemas de Voto Preferencial: Un Estudio de 16 Democracias. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  43. Pilet, J.-B., Freire, A. & Costa, O. (2012). Ballot Structure, District Magnitude and Constituency-Orientation of MPs in Proportional Representation and Majority Electoral Systems. Representation—Journal of Representative Democracy, 48 (4), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rae, D. (1969). The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rule, W., & Zimmerman, J. (Eds.). (1994). Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  47. Schmitt, H. (2009). Partisanship in Nine Democracies: Causes and Consequences. In J. Bartle & P. Belluci (Eds.), Political Parties and Partisanship: Social Identity and Political Attitudes (pp. 75–87). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Shugart, M. S., & Wattenberg, M. P. (Eds.). (2000). Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wessels, B., & Schmitt, H. (2008). Meaningful Choices, Political Supply and Institutional Effectiveness. Electoral Studies, 28, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISCTE-IUL, CIES-IUL (Centre for Sociological Studies and Research)Lisbon University InstituteLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations