Advertisement

Sustainability in Business Economics

  • Andrew J. AngusEmail author
  • Joseph G. Nellis
Chapter

Abstract

To a large extent, mainstream economic thinking on sustainability has coalesced into the field of environmental economics. However, in this chapter we propose that practice has now moved beyond this view of sustainability. Sustainable action is often led by business as a means of gaining competitive advantage, creating, or destroying barriers to entry, or creating new markets. We suggest that sustainability thinking should be infused through both microeconomic and macroeconomic teaching, rather than being a distinct topic on a microeconomics module or course.

Accordingly, we propose that a microeconomics syllabus should view sustainability from a firm’s perspective, as a means of improving competitiveness, creating new barriers to entry, or disruptive innovation, rather than viewed entirely through a lens of government intervention. A macroeconomics syllabus should include questions around how to measure economic growth, adjusted for environmental gains and losses, or in a way that more closely links to human wellbeing. Consideration should also be given to what concepts such as the green economy, circular economy, and steady state economy mean in the context of macroeconomic planning.

Keywords

Sustainability Economics Efficiency Policy 

References

  1. Ando, Amy, and Donna Harrington. 2006. Tradable Discharge Permits: A Student Friendly Game. Journal of Economic Education 37: 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang, Frederic, and Steven Van Passel. 2012. Beyond the Environmentalist’s Paradox and the Debate on Weak Versus Strong Sustainability. BioScience 62: 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angerer, Gerhard, Ralf Nordbeck, and Christian Sartorius. 2008. Impacts on Industry of Europe’s Emerging Chemicals Policy REACH. Journal of Environmental Management 86: 636–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aslaksen, Iulie, Solveig Glomsrod, and Anne Myhr. 2013. Post-normal Science and Ecological Economics: Strategies for Precautionary Approaches for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Sustainable Development 16: 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbier, Edward. 2011. The Policy Challenges for Green Economy and Sustainable Economic Development. Natural Resources Forum 35: 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2012. The Green Economy Post Rio+20. Science 338: 887–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bordt, Michael. 2018. Discourses in Ecosystem Accounting: A Survey of the Expert Community. Ecological Economics 144: 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boretti, Aleberto. 2017. The Future of the Internal Combustion Engine after “Diesel-Gate”. Paper presented at SAE International Conference on Advances in Design, Materials, Manufacturing and Surface Engineering for Mobility, ADMMS 2017; Chennai; India; July 19, 2017.Google Scholar
  9. Brookings Institute. 2017. The Unprecedented Expansion of the Global Middle Class. Accessed January 16, 2018. https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-unprecedented-expansion-of-the-global-middle-class-2/.
  10. Burtraw, Dallas, and Matt Woerman. 2013. Economic Ideas for a Complex Climate Policy Regime. Energy Economics 40: S24–S31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron, Andrew. 2011. A Sustainable Workplace—We’re All in It Together. Strategic Direction 28: 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coase, Ronald. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corrigan, Jay. 2011. The Pollution Game: A Classroom Game Demonstrating the Relative Effectiveness of Emissions Taxes and Tradable Permits. Journal of Economic Education 42: 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costantini, Valeria, and Massimiliano Mazzanti. 2012. On the Green and Innovative Side of Trade Competitiveness? The Impact of Environmental Policies and Innovation on EU Exports. Research Policy 41: 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daly, Herman. 1973. Towards a Steady State Economy. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Daly, Herman, and John Cobb. 1989. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ederington, Josh, and Jenny Minier. 2003. Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analysis. Canadian Journal of Economics 36: 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ekins, Paul, Sandrine Simon, Lisa Deutsch, Carl Folke, and Rudolf De Groot. 2003. A Framework for the Practical Application of the Concepts of Critical Natural Capital and ‘Strong Sustainability. Ecological Economics 44: 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Epstein, Marc, Adriana Buhovac, and Kristi Yuthas. 2015. Managing Social, Environmental and Financial Performance Simultaneously. Long Range Planning 48: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO. 2017. The Future of Food and Agriculture: Trends and Challenges. Accessed January 16, 2018. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6583e.pdf.
  21. Fleurbaey, Marc. 2009. Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare. Journal of Economic Literature 47: 1029–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fortune Magazine. 2016. How GE Is Changing the World. Accessed January 16, 2018. http://fortune.com/2016/08/19/general-electric-change-world/.
  23. Ghisellini, Patrizia, Catia Cialani, and Sergio Ulgiati. 2016. A Review on Circular Economy: The Expected Transition to a Balanced Interplay of Environmental and Economic Systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 114: 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glen, John, and Joe Nellis. 2010. ‘The Price You Pay’: The Impact of State-Funded Secondary School Performance on Residential Property Values in England. Panoeconomicus 57: 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gröschl, Stefan, Patricia Gabaldón, and Tobias Hahn. 2017. The Co-evolution of Leaders’ Cognitive Complexity and Corporate Sustainability: The Case of the CEO of Puma. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–22.Google Scholar
  26. Gurtoo, Anijula, and Simon Antony. 2007. Environmental Regulations: Indirect and Unintended Consequences on Economy and Business. Management of Environmental Quality 18: 626–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hahn, Robert. 2000. The Impact of Economics on Environmental Policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39: 375–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanley, Nick, Jason Shogren, and Ben White. 2006. Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  29. Hartwick, John. 1977. Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources. American Economic Review 67: 972–974.Google Scholar
  30. Hodge, Ian. 1989. Compensation for Nature Conservation. Environment & Planning A 21: 1027–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hotelling, Harold. 1931. The Economics of Exhaustible Resources. Journal of Political Economy 39: 137–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johansson, Per-Olov. 1991. An Introduction to Modern Welfare Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jordan, Andrew, Rudiger Wurzel, and Anthony Zito. 2003. New’ Instruments of Environmental Governance: Patterns and Pathways of Change. Environmental Politics 12: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kahneman, Daniel, and Jack Knetsch. 1992. Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22: 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kubiszewski, Ida, Robert Costanza, Carol Franco, Philip Lawn, John Talberth, Tim Jackson, and Camille Aylmer. 2013. Beyond GDP: Measuring and Achieving Global Genuine Progress. Ecological Economics 93: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu, Jing-Yue, and Chao Feng. 2018. Marginal Abatement Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Its Influencing Factors: A Global Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 170: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malthus, Thomas. 1798. Essay on the Principle of Population. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Morris, Joe, Rowbotham, Alex, Angus, Andrew, Mann, Michael, and Poll, Ian. 2009. A Framework for Estimating the Marginal Costs of Environmental Abatement for the Aviation Sector. OMEGA Project 14. Bedford: Cranfield University.Google Scholar
  39. O’Niell, John. 1993. Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-being and the Natural World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Parson, Edward., and Eric Kravitz. 2013. Market Instruments for the Sustainability Transition. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38: 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pearce, David, Anil Markandya, and Barbier Edward. 1989. Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  42. Perman, Robert, Yue Ma, Michael Common, David Maddison, and J. McGilvray. 2011. Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. 4th ed. London: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  43. Rao, Pinninti. 2000. Sustainable Development: Economics and Policy. Padstow: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Rennings, Klaus, and Christian Rammer. 2011. The Impact of Regulation-Driven Environmental Innovation on Innovation Success and Firm Performance. Industry and Innovation 18: 255–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Revesz, Richard, and Allison Kong. 2011. Regulatory Change and Optimal Transition Relief. North Western University Law Review 106: 1582–1626.Google Scholar
  46. Rivas Casado, Monica, Jan Serafini, John Glen, and Andrew Angus. 2017. Monetising the Impacts of Waste Incinerators Sited on Brownfield Land Using the Hedonic Pricing Method. Waste Management 61: 608–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Select USA. 2015. Environmental Technology Spotlight: The Environmental Technology Industry in the United States. Accessed January 16, 2018. https://www.selectusa.gov/environmental-technology-industry-united-states.
  48. Solow, Robert. 1986. On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88: 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, Chris, Simon Pollard, Sophie Rocks, and Andrew Angus. 2012. Selecting Policy Instruments for Better Environmental Regulation: A Critique and Future Research Agenda. Environmental Policy and Governance 22: 268–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ———. 2015. Better by Design: Business Preferences for Environmental Regulatory Reform. Science of the Total Environment 512–513: 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. The New York Times. 2016. G.E. Spent Years Cleaning Up the Hudson. Was It Enough? Accessed January 16, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/09/nyregion/general-electric-pcbs-hudson-river.html.
  52. UN. 2017. World Population Prospects 2017. Accessed January 16, 2018. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/.
  53. UNEP. 2012. A Guidebook to the Green Economy: Issue 1: Green Economy, Green Growth, and Low-Carbon Development—History, Definitions and a Guide to Recent Publications. Accessed January 16, 2018. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/GE%20Guidebook.pdf.
  54. Walter, Xavier, Andrew Stinchcombe, John Greenman, and Ioannis Ieropoulos. 2017. Urine Transduction to Usable Energy: A Modular MFC Approach for Smartphone and Remote System Charging. Applied Energy 192: 575–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. WRAP. 2007. Lightweight Glass Containers: Understanding Consumer Perceptions. Accessed January 16, 2018. http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/14325%2003%20Consumer%20Perceptions%20CS%20for%20web%2027th%20March%2007.pdf.
  57. Yin, Kwong, Adrian Ward, Paul Dargusch, and Anthony Halog. 2018. The Cost of Abatement Options to Reduce Carbon Emissions from Australian International Flights. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 12: 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cranfield School of ManagementBedfordUK

Personalised recommendations