Advertisement

Introduction: Regional Governance in South America

  • Anne Marie Hoffmann
Chapter
Part of the Governance, Development, and Social Inclusion in Latin America book series (GDSILA)

Abstract

Regional public policy-making develops in flexible institutional environments. Every public policy field, be it health, social development, infrastructure, culture, or science, has an own rationality of action and own objectives. The introduction to the book Regional Governance in South America elaborates on this hypothesis along the lines of regional integration studies and policy studies. The foundational question to this book is how policy fields develop differently, although being embedded into the same regional structure, and is based on the empirical observation of South American regionalism. In the context of UNASUR, a variety of policy fields institutionalized in a short time. However, these processes are not new. On the contrary, they rely on long enduring developments. By adopting the analytical lens of regional governance, the institutionalization of policy fields in UNASUR will be studied. Regional governance captures flexible institutional structures and implies an actor-based perception, which is useful for the study of regional public policy-making.

References

  1. Acharya, Amitav. 2012. Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time Has Come? The International Spectator 47 (1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, Amitav, and Alastair Iain Johnston. 2007. Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Best, Edward. 2012. Assessing Regional Governance: An Indicative Framework for Developing Indicators. In The Regional Integration Manual: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods, ed. Philippe de Lombaerde, Renato Galvão Flores, Lelio Iapadre, and Michael Schulz, 1–24. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Blumer, Herbert. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cross, Mai’a K. Davis. 2011. Security Integration in Europe: How Knowledge-Based Networks Are Transforming the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2013. Rethinking Epistemic Communities Twenty Years Later. Review of International Studies 39 (01): 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gardini, Gian Luca, ed. 2009. Latin America in the 21st Century—Nations, Regionalism, Globalization. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  8. Gilbert, M. 2006. Rationality in Collective Action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goertz, Gary, and Kathy Powers. 2014. Regional Governance: The Evolution of a New Institutional Form. Discussion Paper Social Science Research Center Berlin SP IV (2014-106).Google Scholar
  10. Goffman, Erving. 1970. Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  11. Haas, Ernst B. 1964. Beyond the Nation-State—Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hettne, Björn. 2003. The New Regionalism Revisited. In Theories of New Regionalism, ed. Fredrik Söderbaum and Timothy M. Shaw, 22–42. International Political Economy Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2005. Regionalism and World Order. In Global Politics of Regionalism—Theory and Practice, ed. Mary Farrell, Björn Hettne, and Luk Van Langenhove, 269–286. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hveem, Helge. 2003. The Regional Project in Global Governance. In Theories of New Regionalism, ed. Fredrik Söderbaum and Timothy M. Shaw, 81–98. International Political Economy Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
  15. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1974. Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations. World Politics 27 (1): 39–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malamud, Andrés. 2013. Overlapping Regionalism, No Integration: Conceptual Issues and the Latin American Experiences. EUI Working Paper RSCAS, no. 20.Google Scholar
  17. Maxwell, Simon, and Diane Stone, eds. 2004. Global Knowledge Networks and International Development. 1st ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Mayntz, Renate. 1993. Modernization and the Logic of Interorganizational Networks. Knowledge and Policy 6 (1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe—Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Neuman, Iver B. 2003. A Region-Building Approach. In Theories of New Regionalism, ed. Fredrik Söderbaum and Timothy M. Shaw, 160–178. International Political Economy Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
  21. Nolte, Detlef. 2014. Latin America’s New Regional Architecture: A Cooperative or Segmented Regional Governance Complex? Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 89. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2494843.
  22. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Powers, Kathy, and Gary Goertz. 2011. The Economic-Institutional Construction of Regions: Conceptualisation and Operationalisation. Review of International Studies 37 (5): 2387–2415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raustalia, Kal. 2002. The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law. Virginia Journal of International Law Association 43 (1): 1–92.Google Scholar
  25. Riggirozzi, Pía. 2012. Reconstructing Regionalism: What Does Development Have to Do with It? In The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism, ed. Pía Riggirozzi and Diana Tussie, 17–39. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Riggirozzi, Pía, and Jean Grugel. 2015. Regional Governance and Legitimacy in South America: The Meaning of UNASUR. International Affairs 91 (4): 781–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Riggirozzi, Pía, and Diana Tussie, eds. 2012. The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  28. Searle, John R. 2005. What Is an Institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2009. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Thomas N. Hale. 2010a. Transgovernmental Networks and Emerging Powers. In Rising States, Rising Institutions: Challenges for Global Governance, ed. Alan S. Alexandroff and Andrew Fenton Cooper, 48–62. Waterloo, ON: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 2010b. Transgovernmental Networks. In The SAGE Handbook of Governance, ed. Mark Bevir, 342–352. SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  32. Söderbaum, Frederik. 2015. Early, Old, New and Comparative Regionalism: The Scholarly Development of the Field. KFG Working Paper, no. 64.Google Scholar
  33. Stone, Diane. 2013. Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Langenhove, Luk. 2011. Building Regions—The Regionalization of the World Order. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Official Documents

  1. UNASUR (Union of South American Nations). 2008. Constitutive Treaty. Brasilia, Brazil.Google Scholar

Interviews

  1. Samper, Ernesto. 2014.Google Scholar
  2.  Former General Secretary of UNASURGoogle Scholar
  3.  General Secretariat UNASURGoogle Scholar
  4.  Quito, EcuadorGoogle Scholar
  5.  Interview: 22.11.2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Marie Hoffmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Hamburg University of Applied SciencesHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations