Sensing Film Performance

  • Sean RedmondEmail author
Part of the Performance Philosophy book series (PPH)


In ‘Sensing Film Performance’, Sean Redmond analyses three films—Under the Skin (Glazer 2013), The Wrestler (Aronofsky 2008), and Lust, Caution (Lee 2008)—with an eye towards the way in which a phenomenological perspective can underscore the essentially embodied nature of experiencing film. Redmond suggests a series of ‘carnal alignments’ emerge between the bodies of the actor, character, and viewer, and that these conjunctions are at once individual (or ‘deeply personal’) and collective. In tracing these alignments, Redmond helps expand our sense of the performative, by positing the cinematic screen itself as a performative environment, and the embodied spectator as a performative being.


  1. Balázs, Béla. 1970. Theory of the Film; Character and Growth of a New Art. New York: Dover Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, Roland. 1982. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. London: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  3. Causey, Matthew. 2007. Theatre and Performance in Digital Culture: From Simulation to Embeddedness. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deleuze, Gilles. 2005. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Depp, Johnny. 2003. “By Johnny. In His Own Words. 2003. Mickey Rourke.”
  6. Ding, Shaoyan. 2011. “Beyond Language: The Postmodern Poetics of Ang Lee’s Adaptation of Lust/Caution.” Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies 25 (1): 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  8. Frampton, Daniel. 2012. Filmosophy. London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, Stuart. 2011. “The Neo-Liberal Revolution.” Cultural Studies 25 (6): 705–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland, Norman H. 1963. “Puzzling Movies: Their Appeal.” The Journal of the Society of Cinematologists 3: 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marks, Laura U. 2000. The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Naremore, James. 1988. Acting in the Cinema. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. O’Malley, Shiela. 2008. “Gone Away, Come Back: Mickey Rourke.” Slant Magazine.
  14. Patton, Michael Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Redmond, Sean. 2006. “Intimate Fame Everywhere.” In Framing Celebrity: New Directions in Celebrity Culture, edited by S. Holmes and S. Redmond, 27–44. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2013. Celebrity and the Media. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2015. “Introduction.” In The Companion to Celebrity, edited by P. David Marshall and Sean Redmond. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2016. “Sounding Loneliness in Under the Skin.Senses of Cinema, Issue 78, March.
  19. Remshardt, Ralf. 2008. “Beyond Performance Studies: Mediated Performance and the Posthuman.” Cultura, lenguaje y representación: revista de estudios culturales de la Universitat Jaume I 6: 47–64.Google Scholar
  20. Rojek, Chris. 2001. Celebrity. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Sobchack, Vivian. 2000. “What My Fingers Knew: The Cinesthetic Subject, or Vision in the Flesh.” Senses of Cinema, Issue 5, April.
  22. ———. 2004. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sternagel, Joerg. 2009. “From Inside Us: Experiencing the Film Actor in Michael Haneke’s Caché.” Film International 7 (3): 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations