Advertisement

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

  • Luis M. TumialánEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

A seismic shift occurred in the management of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy with the introduction of an anterior approach to the cervical spine by Smith and Robinson and by Cloward. Since its inception, the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been perhaps the most dependable, reproducible, and effective operation in the spine surgeon’s armamentarium. Refinements to the procedure with cervical plating and interbody graft options have added to that reliability and efficacy. The ACDF has now evolved into a consistently high-quality and low-cost outpatient procedure. The goal of this chapter is to review the indications, contraindications, surgical techniques, and complication avoidance in patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy being managed with an anterior approach to the cervical spine. Case presentations at the end of the chapter illustrate and reinforce various key points.

Keywords

Cervical radiculopathy Cervical myelopathy Anterior approach Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ACDF 

Notes

Disclosures

Dr. Tumialán is a consultant to Medtronic, plc. He is an investor in LessRay, which is owned by NuVasive.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40-A(3):607–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958;15(6):602–17.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGirt MJ, Godil SS, Asher AL, Parker SL, Devin CJ. Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(6):E9.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mansfield HE, Canar WJ, Gerard CS, O'Toole JE. Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a cost analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(5):E9.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.8.FOCUS14373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alvin MD, Lubelski D, Abdullah KG, Whitmore RG, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Cost-utility analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating (ACDFP) versus posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) for patients with single-level cervical radiculopathy at 1-year follow-up. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(2):E67–72.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000099.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tumialán LM, Ponton RP, Gluf WM. Management of unilateral cervical radiculopathy in the military: the cost effectiveness of posterior cervical foraminotomy compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28(5):E17.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09305.
  7. 7.
    Witiw CD, Tetreault LA, Smieliauskas F, Kopjar B, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG. Surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a patient-centered quality of life and health economic evaluation. Spine J. 2017;17(1):15–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matz PG, Ryken TC, Groff MW, Vresilovic EJ, Anderson PA, Heary RF, et al. Techniques for anterior cervical decompression for radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11(2):183–97.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xie JC, Hurlbert RJ. Discectomy versus discectomy with fusion versus discectomy with fusion and instrumentation: a prospective randomized study. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(1):107–16; discussion 116–7.  https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000279730.44016.da.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jagannathan J, Shaffrey CI, Oskouian RJ, Dumont AS, Herrold C, Sansur CA, et al. Radiographic and clinical outcomes following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and allograft fusion without plate placement or cervical collar. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8(5):420–8.  https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI/2008/8/5/420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith JS, Lafage V, Ryan DJ, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Patel AA, et al. Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume: analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AOSpine North America Myelopathy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(22 Suppl 1):S161–70.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb9e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Acosta FL Jr, Protopsaltis TS, Blondel B, et al. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(2):141–59.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12838.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Odate S, Shikata J, Soeda T, Yamamura S, Kawaguchi S. Surgical results and complications of anterior decompression and fusion as a revision surgery after initial posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, et al. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 2: advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(6):654–60.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000257566.91177.cb.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, et al. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 1: clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(6):647–53.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000257560.91147.86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nassr A, Lee JY, Bashir RS, Rihn JA, Eck JC, Kang JD, et al. Does incorrect level needle localization during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion lead to accelerated disc degeneration? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(2):189–92.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181913872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith PN, Balzer JR, Khan MH, Davis RA, Crammond D, Welch WC, et al. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in nonmyelopathic patients—a review of 1,039 cases. Spine J. 2007;7(1):83–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kalb S, Fakhran S, Dean B, Ross J, Porter RW, Kakarla UK, et al. Cervical spinal cord infarction after cervical spine decompressive surgery. World Neurosurg. 2014;81(5–6):810–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jung A, Schramm J. How to reduce recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective observational study. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(1):10–5; discussion 15.  https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000370203.26164.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Apfelbaum RI, Kriskovich MD, Haller JR. On the incidence, cause, and prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies during anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(22):2906–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chin KR, Ricchetti ET, Yu WD, Riew KD. Less exposure surgery for multilevel anterior cervical fusion using 2 transverse incisions. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(3):194–8.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.5.SPINE111112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vaccaro AR, Ring D, Scuderi G, Garfin SR. Vertebral artery location in relation to the vertebral body as determined by two-dimensional computed tomography evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(23):2637–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maharaj MM, Phan K, Mobbs RJ. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) autograft versus graft substitutes: What do patients prefer? A clinical study. J Spine Surg. 2016;2(2):105–10.  https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2016.05.01.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Najeeb S, Bds ZK, Bds SZ, Bds MS. Bioactivity and osseointegration of PEEK are inferior to those of titanium: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol. 2016;42(6):512–6.  https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(8):3363–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.037.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AG, Baek S, Kandziora F, et al. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(2):156–60.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ff9c4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim HJ, Kelly MP, Ely CG, Dettori JR, Riew KD. The risk of adjacent-level ossification development after surgery in the cervical spine: are there factors that affect the risk? A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(22 Suppl):S65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826cb8f5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee DH, Lee JS, Yi JS, Cho W, Zebala LP, Riew KD. Anterior cervical plating technique to prevent adjacent-level ossification development. Spine J. 2013;13(7):823–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dipaola CP, Jacobson JA, Awad H, Conrad BP, Rechtine GR 2nd. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP. Spine J. 2008;8(5):717–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Olsson EC, Jobson M, Lim MR. Risk factors for persistent dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. Orthopedics. 2015;38(4):e319–23.  https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20150402-61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cho SK, Lu Y, Lee DH. Dysphagia following anterior cervical spinal surgery: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(7):868–73.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR. Persistent swallowing and voice problems after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J. 2005;14(7):677–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0849-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nassr A, Eck JC, Ponnappan RK, Zanoun RR, Donaldson WF 3rd, Kang JD. The incidence of C5 palsy after multilevel cervical decompression procedures: a review of 750 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(3):174–8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219cfe9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(21):2447–51.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000090833.96168.3F.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Halani SH, Baum GR, Riley JP, Pradilla G, Refai D, Rodts GE Jr, et al. Esophageal perforation after anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(3):285–91.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.1.SPINE15898.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryBarrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations