Advertisement

Group Formation in CSCL: A Review of the State of the Art

  • Simone BorgesEmail author
  • Riichiro Mizoguchi
  • Ig Ibert Bittencourt
  • Seiji Isotani
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 832)

Abstract

Group formation in CSCL refers to the process of adequate selection and grouping of students to create scenarios and situations that help the learning to occur more smoothly. Objective: this paper presents a systematic mapping of the literature about group formation for CSCL intended to characterize the state of the art in the field as well as identifying gaps and opportunities for further re-search. Method: We designed a protocol to collect and analyze the literature on group formation in CSCL and carried it out using a rigorous systematic re-view/mapping method established in the literature. Initially, we collected 3571 papers about CSCL that had the potential to provide important information about research on group formation. After initial screening, 423 were recognized as papers related to group formation. After a careful analysis, 106 papers met the necessary requirements/criteria defined in our protocol. Results: each of the 106 papers was categorized according to their contributions using information extracted from this systematic mapping, and a framework to classify research in the field is proposed. Conclusions: this work provides an extensive analysis of the literature on group formation for CSCL offering an overview of the state of the art as well as opportunities for future research. We also create an infographic to summarize our findings, available at http://infografico.caed-lab.com/mapping/gfc/.

Keywords

Systematic mapping Group formation Literature review Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 

References

  1. 1.
    Abnar, S., Orooji, F., Taghiyareh, F.: An evolutionary algorithm for forming mixed groups of learners in web based collaborative learning environments. In: Proceedings - 2012 IEEE International Conference on Technology Enhanced Education, ICTEE 2012, Kerala, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTEE.2012.6208612
  2. 2.
    Adán-Coello, J.M., Tobar, C.M., de Faria, E.S.J., de Menezes, W.S., de Freitas, R.L.: Forming groups for collaborative learning of introductory computer programming based on students’ programming skills and learning styles. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. 7(4), 34–46 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2011100104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alfonseca, E., Carro, R.M., Martín, E., Ortigosa, A., Paredes, P.: The impact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: a case study. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 16(3–4), 377–401 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-006-9012-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ardaiz-Villanueva, O., Nicuesa-Chacón, X., Brene-Artazcoz, O., de Acedo Lizarraga, M.L.S., de Acedo Baquedano, M.T.S.: Evaluation of computer tools for idea generation and team formation in project-based learning. Comput. Educ. 56(3), 700–711 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balestrini, M., Hernandez-Leo, D., Nieves, R., Blat, J.: Technology-supported orchestration matters: outperforming paper-based scripting in a jigsaw classroom. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 7(1), 17–30 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barkley, E.F., et al.: Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boticki, I., Wong, L.H., Looi, C.-K.: Designing technology for content-independent collaborative mobile learning. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 6(1), 14–24 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chiu, C.-H., Hsiao, H.-F.: Group differences in computer supported collaborative learning: evidence from patterns of Taiwanese students’ online communication. Comput. Educ. 54(2), 427–435 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dillenbourg, P.: Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner, P.A. (ed.) Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL, pp. 61–91. Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dillenbourg, P., Jermann, P.: Designing integrative scripts. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., Haake, J.M., et al. (eds.) Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 275–301. Springer, US (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Durelli, V.H.S., et al.: A scoping study on the 25 years of research into software testing in Brazil and an outlook on the future of the area. J. Syst. Softw. 86(4), 934–950 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Strength of evidence in systematic reviews in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), pp. 178–187. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dybå, T., et al.: Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners. IEEE. Softw. 22(1), 58–65 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Graf, S., Bekele, R.: Forming heterogeneous groups for intelligent collaborative learning systems with ant colony optimization. In: Ikeda, Mitsuru, Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 217–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greer, J., McCalla, G., Cooke, J., Collins, J., Kumar, V., Bishop, A., Vassileva, J.: The Intelligent Helpdesk: Supporting Peer-Help in a University Course. In: Goettl, B.P., Halff, H.M., Redfield, C.L., Shute, V.J. (eds.) ITS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1452, pp. 494–503. Springer, Heidelberg (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hernández-Leo, D., Nieves, R.: Orchestration signals in the classroom: managing the Jigsaw collaborative learning flow. In: Kloos, C.D., Gillet, D., Crespo García, R.M., Wild, F., Wolpers, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2011. LNCS, vol. 6964, pp.153–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hsu, J., Chou, H., Hwang, W., Chou, S.: A two-dimension process in explaining learners’ collaborative behaviors in CSCL. Educ. Technol. Soc. 11(4), 66–80 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ikeda, M., Go, S., Mizoguchi, R.: Opportunistic group formation. In: Proceedings of AIED Artificial Intelligence and Education, pp. 167–174 (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Isotani, S., et al.: An ontology engineering approach to the realization of theory-driven group formation. Int. J. Comput. Collab. Learn. 4(4), 445–478 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R.: Adventures in the boundary between domain-independent ontologies and domain content for CSCL. In: Lovrek, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5179, pp. 523–532. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85567-5_65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laurillard, D.: The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. Int. J. Comput. Collab. Learn. 4(1), 5–20 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Magnisalis, I., et al.: Adaptive and intelligent systems for collaborative learning support: a review of the field. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 4(1), 5–20 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moreno, J., et al.: A genetic algorithm approach for group formation in collaborative learning considering multiple student characteristics. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 560–569 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muehlenbrock, M.: Formation of learning groups by using learner profiles and context information. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 507–514 (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mujkanovic, A., Lowe, D.: Unsupervised learning algorithm for adaptive group formation: Collaborative learning support in remotely accessible laboratories. In: International Conference on Information Society, London, pp. 50–57 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ounnas, A., Davis, H., Millard, D.: A framework for semantic group formation in education. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(4), 43–55 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roschelle, J., Teasley, S.: The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: O’Malley, C. (ed.) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 69–97. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stahl, G. et al.: CSCL: An Historical Perspective. University Press (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Villasclaras-Fernández, E.D., Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y.: Incorporating assessment in a pattern-based design process for CSCL scripts. Comput. Human Behavior. 25(5), 1028–1039 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wesner, M., Pfister, H.: Group formation in computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting GroupWork, pp. 24–31 (2001)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wieringa, R., et al.: Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion. Requir. Eng. 11(1), 102–107 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yannibelli, V., Amandi, A.: A deterministic crowding evolutionary algorithm to form learning teams in a collaborative learning context. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(10), 8584–8592 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of São PauloSão CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.Japan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyNomi, KanazawaJapan
  3. 3.Federal University of AlagoasMaceióBrazil

Personalised recommendations