Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Voices of Authorities and Shareholders Affect Voices of Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Well-Being in the Information Society. Fighting Inequalities (WIS 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 907))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 632 Accesses

Abstract

There are several voices (e.g., needs or requirements) concern the business. In this paper, the voices of authorities, shareholders and processes are defined to be controlled voices the effects of which can be considered within functional domains and enterprise entities. The Voice of the Authority (VoA) is in common controls, the Voice of the Shareholder (VoS) is in corporate controls and the Voice of the Process (VoP) is in process controls. Three constructions are proposed to strength the meaning of the controlled voices. First, common, corporate, and process controls are mapped within two functional domains (i.e., control and operations) of the Industrial Internet Reference Architecture (IIRA) to illustrate the importance of the voices. Second, 11 related entities (i.e., control, course of action, data entity, driver, event, function, goal, measure, process, and service) of the Togaf 9.2 content metamodel are mapped within control and operations domains. Third, the definitions of the entities are mapped within the voices of authorities, shareholders and processes. The Voice of the Authority and the Voice of the Shareholder affect processes via contract, control, and course of action entities. We discuss the meaning of the constructions in the context the healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Finnish Government: Regional government, health and social services reform (2017). https://alueuudistus.fi/en/general-information-reform

  2. The International Foundation for Digital Competences: VeriSMTM - a service management approach for the digital age. Van Haren (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Open Group: The TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2 (2018). http://pubs.open-group.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/index.html

  4. The International Organization for Standardization: ISO 13053-2:2011(en) quantitative methods in process improvement—Six Sigma—part 2: tools and techniques (2011). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:13053:-2:ed-1:v1:en

  5. The International Organization for Standardization, the International Electrotechnical Commission: ISO/IEC 26551:2016(en) software and systems engineering—tools and methods for product line requirements engineering (2016). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso-iec:26551:ed-2:v1:en

  6. Elsevier: Scopus (2018). https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus

  7. The Industrial Internet Consortium: The Industrial Internet of Things Volume G1: Reference Architecture (2017). http://www.iiconsortium.org/IIC_PUB_G1_V1.80_2017-01-31.pdf

  8. Makola, D., Hotti, V.: Critical success factors for adopting enterprise architecture metamodels in the health sector: literature review. J. Health Inform. Afr. 1(1), 127–132 (2013). https://www.jhia-online.org/index.php/jhia/article/viewFile/43/622013

    Google Scholar 

  9. Adobe: Adobe Releases Common Control Framework (CCF) as Open Source (2017). http://blogs.adobe.com/security/2017/05/open-source-ccf.html

  10. Adobe: Compliance overview (2017). https://www.adobe.com/con-tent/dam/acom/en/security/pdfs/AdobeCloudServices_ComplianceOverview.pdf

  11. Network Frontiers LLC: Unified Compliance Framework (2018). https://www.unifiedcompliance.com

  12. HITRUST Alliance: HITRUST (2018). https://hitrustalliance.net

  13. Mussalo, P., et al.: Common controls driven conceptual leadership framework. Finnish J. eHealth eWelfare 10(1), 89–101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.23996/fjhw.68821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. European Parliament: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance) (2016). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.119.01.0001.01.ENG

  15. Salesforce: Data processing addendum (2018). https://www.salesforce.com/content/dam/web/en_us/www/documents/legal/Agreements/data-processing-addendum.pdf

  16. ServiceNow: Use the Unified Compliance Framework (UCF) with Policy and Compliance Management (2018). https://docs.servicenow.com/bundle/helsinki-governance-risk-compliance/page/product/grc-ucf-import/concept/c_UCF-cch.html

  17. European Commission: Guidelines (2018). http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/news.cfm?item_type=1360

  18. Advameg Inc.: Corporate Control (2018). http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Con-Cos/Corporate-Control.html

  19. De Ana, F.J., Umstead, K.A., Phillips, G.J., Conner, C.P.: Value driven innovation in medical device design: a process for balancing stakeholder voices. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41(9), 1811–1821 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0779-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cho, N.-E., Hong, K.: A kitchen with too many cooks: factors associated with hospital profitability. Sustainability 10(2), 323 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020323

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. General Electric: What is Six Sigma? The Roadmap to Customer Impact (Unknown year). https://www.ge.com/sixsigma/SixSigma.pdf

  22. Shewhart, W.A.: Economic quality control of manufactured product. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 9(2), 364–389 (1930). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1930.tb00373.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Antony, J., Snee, R., Hoerl, R.: Lean Six Sigma: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 34(7), 1073–1093 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2016-0035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hachicha, W., Ghorbel, A.: A survey of control-chart pattern-recognition literature (1991–2010) based on a new conceptual classification scheme. Comput. Ind. Eng. 63(1), 204–222 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Montgomery, D.: Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Orr, K.: Data quality and systems theory. Commun. ACM 41(2), 66–71 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. The International Organization for Standardization: ISO Online Browsing Platform (OBP). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#home

  28. Oxford University Press: English Oxford Living Dictionary (2018). https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/

  29. Cooper, R.G.: Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Bus. Horiz. 33(3), 44–54 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Benneyan, J.C., Lloyd, R.C., Plsek, P.E.: Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Qual. Saf. Health Care 12(6), 458–464 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khoury, M.J., Ioannidis, J.P.: Big data meets public health. Science 346(6213), 1054–1055 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa2709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Curcin, V., Woodcock, T., Poots, A.J., Majeed, A., Bell, D.: Model-driven approach to data collection and reporting for quality improvement. J. Biomed. Inform. 52, 151–162 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bergman, B., Hellström, A., Lifvergren, S., Gustavsson, S.M.: An emerging science of improvement in health care. Qual. Eng. 27(1), 17–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2015.968042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Spiegelhalter, D., Sherlaw-Johnson, C., Bardsley, M., Blunt, I., Wood, C., Grigg, O.: Statistical methods for healthcare regulation: rating, screening and surveillance. J. R. Stat. Soc. 175(1), 1–47 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2011.01010.x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Mahajan, A., Islam, S., Schwartz, M., Cannesson, M.: A hospital is not just a factory, but a complex adaptive system - implications for perioperative care. Anesth. Analg. 125(1), 333–341 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Taner, M.T., Sezen, B., Atwat, K.M.: Application of Six Sigma methodology to a diagnostic imaging process. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 25(4), 274–290 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/09526861211221482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Axelos: ITIL® glossary and abbreviations (2011). https://www.axelos.com/corporate/media/files/glossaries/itil_2011_glossary_gb-v1-0.pdf

  38. Hotti, V.: Framework-based data requirements for IT top management. Int. J. Digit. Inf. Wirel. Commun. 4(3), 299–304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.17781/P001281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosenberg, L.: Are healthcare leaders ready for the real revolution? J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 39(3), 215–219 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-012-9285-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, Microkatu 1, 70200, Kuopio, Finland

    Petteri Mussalo & Virpi Hotti

  2. Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland

    Hanna Mussalo

Authors
  1. Petteri Mussalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Virpi Hotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hanna Mussalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petteri Mussalo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland

    Hongxiu Li

  2. University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

    Ágústa Pálsdóttir

  3. Fachhochschule Flensburg, Flensburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

    Roland Trill

  4. University of Turku, Turku, Finland

    Reima Suomi

  5. Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland

    Yevgeniya Amelina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mussalo, P., Hotti, V., Mussalo, H. (2018). Voices of Authorities and Shareholders Affect Voices of Processes. In: Li, H., Pálsdóttir, Á., Trill, R., Suomi, R., Amelina, Y. (eds) Well-Being in the Information Society. Fighting Inequalities. WIS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 907. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97931-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97931-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97930-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97931-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation