Advertisement

Data Federation in the Era of Digital, Consumer-Centric Cares and Empowered Citizens

  • Tiina Nokkala
  • Tomi Dahlberg
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 907)

Abstract

Breast cancers, similar to any other types of cancers or diseases, need treatments and other actions that generate medical and patient data. As the owner of the data about him-/herself, a patient has the right to get and inspect all basic, treatment and other data recorded about her/him. However, this data is typically in the form of inconsistent data entries, such as medical reports, x-ray and other images, blood test admission notes and results, medication history and diagnoses, and is provided to the patient “as is”. The structure, format and meanings of these data entries differ enormously. Thus, when a patient is given access to all data stored about her/him, (s)he usually lacks capabilities and tools to handle the data, and to use the data for her/his benefit. Still, patients are expected to be able to act on the basis of the data available to them, for example, to make appointments or to bring laboratory test results with them. In a previous study, we made the data of similarly different medical and patient ISs interoperable to the cancer specialists of breast cancer cases by using shared attributes as the linkage between data storages. In this conceptual article, we apply our federative approach to contemplate from the patient’s point of view, how data available to a patient could be made interoperable. We explain the theoretical background of the federative approach and related tools within the mentioned breast cancer case and in general. We then describe how the federative approach could be used in the context of digitalized citizen/patient services, empowered citizens and patient/citizen-centric care. With this article we contribute to research by developing the federative approach further and by explaining how (medical and patient) data can be made interoperable to patients/citizens. Our results suggest means to support citizens and digitalized healthcare service intermediaries as well as patient empowerment.

Keywords

Governance of data Data federation Patient health register Data ontology 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Nykänen, P., Seppälä, A.: Collaborative approach for sustainable citizen-centered health care. In: Wickramasinghe, N., Bali, R.K., Sumoi, R., Kirin, S. (eds.) Critical Issues for the Development of Sustainable E-health Solutions. HDIA, pp. 115–134. Springer, Boston (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1536-7_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pratt, W.: Personal health information management. Commun. ACM 49(1), 51–55 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang, P.C.: The missing link: bridging the patient-provider health information gap. Health Aff. 24(5), 1290–1295 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Detmer, D., Bloomrosen, M., Raymond, B., Tang, P.: Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 8(1), 45 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bos, L., Marsh, A., Carroll, D., Gupta, S., Rees, M.: Patient 2.0 empowerment. In: SWWS, pp. 164–168(2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Archer, N., Fevrier-Thomas, U., Lokker, C., McKibbon, K.A., Straus, S.E.: Personal health records: a scoping review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18(4), 515–522 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dahlberg, T., Nokkala, T.: A framework for the corporate governance of data - theoretical background and empirical evidence. Bus. Manag. Educ. 13(1), 25–45 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dahlberg, T., Nokkala, T., Heikkilä, J., Heikkilä, M.: Data federation with a governance of data framework artifact as the federation tool: case on clinical breast cancer treatment data. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 292, 31–42 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mosley, M., Brackett, M., Earley, S., Henderson, D.: The DAMA Guide to the Data Management Body of Knowledge: DAMA-DMBOK Guide, 1st edn. Technics Publications, LLC, Bradley Beach (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cleven, A., Wortmann, F.: Uncovering four strategies to approach master data management. In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2010, pp. 1–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dreibelbis, A., Hechler, E., Milman, I., Oberhofer, M., van Run, P., Wolfson, D.: Enterprise Master Data Management: An SOA Approach to Managing Core Information. Pearson Education, London (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loshin, D.: Master Data Management. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berson, A., Dubov, L.: Master Data Management and Customer Data Integration for a Global Enterprise. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wand, Y., Wang, R.: Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Commun. ACM 39(11), 86–95 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wand, Y., Weber, R.: An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 16(11), 1282–1292 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shay, L.A., Lafata, J.E.: Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med. Decis. Mak. 35(1), 114–131 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davis, S., Roudsari, A., Raworth, R., Courtney, K.L., MacKay, L.: Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 24(4), 857–866 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Varshney, U.: Pervasive healthcare and wireless health monitoring. Mob. Netw. Appl. 12(2), 113–127 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Islam, S.R., Kwak, D., Kabir, M.H., Hossain, M., Kwak, K.: The Internet of Things for health care: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 3, 678–708 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yin, R.K.: Applications of Case Study Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Auerbach, S.M.: Should patients have control over their own health care?: Empirical evidence and research issues. Ann. Behav. Med. 22(3), 246–259 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Turku School of EconomicsUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations