Advertisement

Describing a Design Thinking Methodology to Develop Sustainable Physical Activity and Nutrition Interventions in Low Resourced Settings

  • Chrisna Botha-Ravyse
  • Susan Crichton
  • Sarah J. Moss
  • Susanna M. Hanekom
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 907)

Abstract

The objective of the study is to describe how design thinking as a participatory process can be applied in determining how sustainable physical activity and nutrition interventions should be implemented in a low resourced community in South Africa. Physical inactivity is the 4th leading cause of mortality world-wide. Associated with inactivity, a high prevalence of obesity is reported. Evidence based research indicate that sustainable physical activity and nutrition interventions will reduce the burden of physical inactivity and obesity. Poverty, and its inherent lack of food security, further impacts the health of people living marginalized, increasingly urban lifestyles. The intent of the project is to change attitudes and behavior towards physical activity participation and nutrition choices. Design Thinking is typically implemented using a five-step process where the community is engaged with presenting the problem they experience, defining the problem, presenting solutions to the problem and finally developing a prototype in solving the problem they experience. The principle of the Design Thinking process is that the low resourced community holds part of the answer to the problem and has a desire to change their health. The proposed solutions, coming directly from the participants, are therefore considered viable. Once a desired prototype is developed and tested in the community, feasibility can be determined. The presence of these three factors, is expected to result in an innovation.

Keywords

Design thinking Feasibility Viability Desirability Innovation Low-resourced communities Physical activity Nutrition 

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, I.M., Shiroma, E.J., Lobelo, F., Puska, P., Blair, S.N., Katzmarzyk, P.T.: Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy 380, 219–229 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61031-9
  2. 2.
    Bradshaw, D., et al.: Provincial mortality in South Africa, 2000-priority-setting for now and a benchmark for the future 95, 496–503 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edwards, S.D., Ngcobo, H.S., Edwards, D.J., Palavar, K.: Exploring the relationship between physical activity, psychological well-being and physical self-perception in different exercise groups 27, 75–90 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ding, E.L., Hu, F.B.: Commentary: Relative importance of diet vs physical activity for health (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp348
  5. 5.
    Reddy, S., et al.: Umthente Uhlaba Usamila-the 2nd South African national youth risk behaviour survey 2008 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pratt, M., Perez, L.G., Goenka, S., Brownson, R.C., Bauman, A., Sarmiento, O.L., Hallal, P.C.: Can population levels of physical activity be increased? Global Evid. Experience 57, 356–367 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2014.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Vos, J.C.W., Du Toit, D., Coetzee, D.: The types and levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour of Senior Phase learners in Potchefstroom 21, 372–380 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hsag.2016.06.005
  8. 8.
    Von Ruesten, A., Weikert, C., Fietze, I., Boeing, H.: Association of sleep duration with chronic diseases in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam study 7, e30972 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moss, S.J., Lubbe, M.S.: The potential market demand for biokinetics in the private health care sector of South Africa 23, 14–19 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pedersen, B.K., Saltin, B.: Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in chronic disease 16, 3–63 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steyn, K., Fourie, J., Temple, N.: Chronic Diseases of Lifestyle in South Africa: 1995 – 2005. South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Health Organization: Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020, Report no. 9241506237 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DOSR: ‘National Sport and Recreation Plan: National Sport and Recreation Plan’, Department of Sport and Recreation (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bauman, A.E., Reis, R.S., Sallis, J.F., Wells, J.C., Loos, R.J., Martin, B.W., Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group: Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? 380, 258–271 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mama, S.K., McCurdy, S.A., Evans, A.E., Thompson, D.I., Diamond, P.M., Lee, R.E.: Using community insight to understand physical activity adoption in overweight and obese African American and Hispanic women a qualitative study, 42, 321–328 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Botha, C.R., Moss, S., Kolbe-Alexander, T.: “Be active!” revisiting the South African food-based dietary guideline for activity 26, S18–S27 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKenney, S., Nieeven, N., Van den Akker, J.: Educational design research. In: Van den Akker, J., Mckenney, S., Nieeven, N. (eds.) Design Research from a Curriculum Perspective, pp. 67–90. Routledge, Abingdon (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berthet, E.T., Barnaud, C., Girard, N., Labatut, J., Martin, G.: How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods, 59, 280–301 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Hatch, M.: The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers. McGraw Hill Professional, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sharma, T., Mishra, P., Tiwari, R.: Designite-A Software Design Quality Assessment Tool, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kania, J., Kramer, M.: Collective Impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weber, E.P., Khademian, A.M.: Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings 68, 334–349 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eisner, E.W.: The kind of schools we need: personal essays. ERIC (1998)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buchenau, M., Suri, J.F.: Experience prototyping. In: Buchenau, M., Suri, J.F. (eds.) Book Experience Prototyping, pp. 424–433. ACM (2000)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strachan, D.L., et al.: Interventions to improve motivation and retention of community health workers delivering integrated community case management (iCCM): stakeholder perceptions and priorities 87, 111–119 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0030
  27. 27.
    Handel, M.J.: mHealth (Mobile Health)—Using Apps for Health and Wellness 7, 256–261 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2011.04.011
  28. 28.
    http://www.dictionary.com/. Accessed 28 Mar 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health Sciences, Physical Activity, Sport and Recreation Research AreaNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroomSouth Africa
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of British ColumbiaKelownaCanada
  3. 3.Center for Health Professions Education, North-West UniversityPotchefstroomSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations