Advertisement

The ECOWAS–EU Economic Partnership Agreement: Towards Inclusive Development?

  • Theophilus Acheampong
  • Ernest Amoabeng OrtsinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development book series (AAESPD)

Abstract

The Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) continues to court controversy. Many ECOWAS countries together with other civil society organizations have expressed concern over the agreement and continue to campaign against it on grounds of possible damage to West Africa’s fragile economies from opening their markets to free trade with the European Union (EU). This notwithstanding, the objectives of the EPA highlight fundamental agreement between both EU and ECOWAS countries about the instrumental role that the agreement could play in pursuing sustainable development goals by recognizing the importance of implementing competitiveness, poverty alleviation strategies, ensuring EU assistance for structural transformation and embracing the principles of asymmetrical liberalization. The literature provides evidence to the fact that not every developing country integrating into the global economy may be considered positive because trade liberalization on its own cannot ensure the attainment of development objectives from an economic, social and environmental perspective.

This paper analyses the ECOWAS-EU EPA agreement attempting to answer the question: how does the agreement foster both international trade and inclusive development by promoting investment and sustainable growth? Using evidence from countries in the ECOWAS sub-region, this discussion paper covers the following thematic areas: (1) external sector development impact of the EPA agreement and (2) the impact on fostering inclusive growth and development. Our analyses indicate that the EPAs will pose a number of policy challenges for West African countries as their economies increasingly morph into the global economy. However, the EPA provides an opportunity to fast-track global trade and the regional integration agenda in West Africa. It is important that the EU treats the EPA as an instrument of development cooperation and not a conduit to pursue mercantilist corporate interests as did happen in colonial times. We also find out that balanced growth and poverty reduction are not automatic outcomes from liberalization processes, but rather these objectives must be actively promoted by complementary policies in conjunction with appropriate fiscal adjustments in order to fully gain from trade liberalization.

Keywords

International trade Trade policy Regional integration Inclusive development 

References

  1. Acheampong, T., Omane-Achamfuor, M., & Anang T. N. (2014). The economic partnership agreement between Ghana and the European Union: A developmental game changer? Ghana Growth and Development Platform Working Paper 2. Accessed June 15, 2016, from http://ghanagdp.org/file/2014/08/GGDP_WP2_Ghana-and-EPA.pdf
  2. ActionAid Ghana. (2003). Ghana under interim Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA): Analysis of socioeconomic development and policy options under the interim EPA regime with the European Union. Accessed June 18, 2016, from http://www.actionaid.org/sites/files/actionaid/actionaid_ghana_research_-_ghana_under_interim_epa_and_implications_for_socio-economic_development.pdf
  3. African Development Bank. (2015). African Economic Outlook 2015: Resilient economies, positive forecast for West Africa. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.afdb.org/en/blogs/measuring-the pulse-of-economic-transformation-in-west-africa/post/african-economic-outlook-2015-resilient economies-positive-forecast-for-west-africa-14406/
  4. Aning, K., & Atta-Asamoah, A. (2011). Demography, environment and conflict in West Africa. Occasional Paper No. 34. Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre. Accessed May 23, 2016, from http://www.kaiptc.org/Publications/Occasional-Papers/Documents/Occasional Paper-34-Aning-and-Asamoah.aspx
  5. Bagooro, S. (2014). West Africa and Europe trade: Who will benefit more? Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/06/west-africa-europe-trade agree-2014621155835409177.html
  6. Berg, M. A., & Krueger, A. O. (2003). Trade, growth, and poverty: A selective survey (No. 3-30). International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  7. Bortolot, A. I. (2003) Trade relations among European and African Nations. In Heilbrunn timeline of art history. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/aftr/hd_aftr.htm
  8. Chandran, V. G. R., & Munusamy. (2009). Trade openness and manufacturing growth in Malaysia. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(5), 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, R., Kaltani, L., & Loayza, N. V. (2009). Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementarities. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, B. L. (1999). Trade openness and economic growth: Evidence in East Asia and Latin America. Journal of Economic Integration, 14, 265–295.Google Scholar
  11. Easterly, W. (2007). Inequality does cause underdevelopment: Insights from a new instrument. Journal of Development Economics, 84(2), 755–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2014). International trade and inclusive development: Building synergies. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.cepal.org/en/publications/37040-international-trade-and-inclusive-development building-synergies
  13. Edwards, S. (1993). Openness, trade liberalization, and growth in developing countries. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1358–1393.Google Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2016a). Aid for Trade – Trade – European Commission. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/development/aid-for-trade
  15. European Commission. (2016b). Overview of economic partnership agreements. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/september/tradoc_144912.pdf
  16. European Commission. (2016c). ACP – The Cotonou Agreement – International Cooperation and Development – European Commission. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/where/acp/overview/cotonou-agreement/index_en.htm
  17. Eusufzai, Z. (1998). Do more open countries have a higher growth rate but more inequality? Atlantic Economic Journal, 26(1), 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferreira, F. H. G. (1999). Inequality and economic performance: A brief overview to theories of growth and distribution. Accessed May 8, 2016, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPGI/Resources/Inequality/ferreira.pdf
  19. Frankel, J. A., & Romer, D. (1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89, 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galor, O. (2009). Inequality and economic development: An overview. Inequality and economic development: The modern perspective. Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Gries, T., & Redlin, M. (2012, June). Trade openness and economic growth: A panel causality analysis. In International Conferences of RCIE, KIET, and APEA, March (pp. 16–18).Google Scholar
  23. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Grynberg, R. (1998). The WTO incompatibility of the Lomé convention trade provisions. The Asia Pacific school of economics and management. Working Papers 98/3. Accessed April 29, 2016, from https://crawford.anu.edu.au/pdf/wp98/sp98-3.pdf
  25. Hanson, K. T., & Leautier, F. (2013). Jobless economic growth in Africa: Is there a role for agriculture? Journal of African Development, 15(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  26. Huchet-Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C. L. M., & Vijil, M. (2011). The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. In XIIIème Congrès de l’Association Européenne des Economistes Agricoles (EAAE).Google Scholar
  27. Krugman, P. R. (1986). Strategic trade policy and the new international economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Le, M. S. (2014). Trade openness and household welfare within a country: A microeconomic analysis of Vietnamese households. Journal of Asian Economics, 33, 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, H. Y., Ricci, L. A., & Rigobon, R. (2004). Once again, is openness good for growth? Journal of Development Economics, 75(2), 451–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lisk, F. (2015). Boosting investment for transformative growth and competitiveness in African economies: A review of trends, policies, development challenges and prospects. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.crepol.org/_literature_136471/Boosting_Investment_for_Transformative_Growth_and_Competitiveness
  31. Morgan, R., & Katsikeas, C. (1997). Theories of international trade, foreign direct investment and firm internationalization: A critique. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/business/distance/Economics/Reading/Critique_trade_theories.pdf
  32. Mustafa, G., Rizov, M., & Kernohan, D. (2013). Openness, economic growth, and human development: The Asian experience. Accessed June 11, 2016, from https://editorialexpress.com/cgibin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=GPEN2013&paper_id=52
  33. Nourzad, F., & Powell, J. J. (2003). Openness, growth, and development: Evidence from a panel of developing countries. Scientific Journal of Administrative Development, 1, 72–94.Google Scholar
  34. Nwoke, C. O. (2009). EU-ECOWAS economic partnership agreement: Nigeria’s role in securing development-focus and regional integration. Accessed February 12, 2016, from https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Knowledge/2009%20AEC-%20EUECOWAS%20Economic%20Partnership%20Agreement%20Nigeria%27s%20Role%20in%20ensurnig%20Development-Focus%20and%20Regional%20Integration.pdf
  35. Pacheco-López, P., & Thirlwall, A. P. (2011). Has trade liberalisation in poor countries delivered the promises expected? In Market liberalism, growth, and economic development in Latin America (pp. 7–25). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution, and democracy: What the data say. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 149–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ricardo, D. (1817). Principles of political economy in P. Saffra (Ed.) (1951). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. 1. London: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. London: Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995) Natural resource abundance and economic growth. NBER Working Papers, No. 5398. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  40. Sinha, D., & Sinha, T. (2002). Openness, investment and economic growth in Asia. Indian Economic Journal, 49(4), 90–95.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, edited by E. Cannan (1961) and reprinted by Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Sy, A. (2014). Jobless growth in sub-Saharan Africa. The Brookings Institution. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/africa-in-focus/posts/2014/01/30-jobless-growth-africa-sy
  43. Tahir, M., & Khan, I. (2014). Trade openness and economic growth in the Asian region. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 7(3), 136–152.  https://doi.org/10.1108/jcefts-05-20140006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2015). World investment report: Reforming international investment governance. Accessed June 10, 2016, from http://www.unctad.org/wir
  45. United Nations Development Programme. (2015). Human development report: Work for human development. Accessed June 8, 2016, from http://hdr.undp.org/2015-report
  46. Winters, A. L. (2002). Trade liberalisation and poverty: What are the links? Accessed 11 June, 2016, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRSUMESSD/Resources/1729402 - 1150389437293/Winters_Trade_Lib_and_Poverty_World_Ec_2002.pdf
  47. World Bank. (2014). Trade liberalization: Why so much controversy? Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www1.worldbank.org/prem/lessons1990s/chaps/05-Ch05_kl.pdf
  48. World Trade Organization. (2002). Annual report. Accessed May 23, 2016 from https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/anrep_e/anrep02_e.pdf
  49. Yanikkaya, H. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: A cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yusoff, M., & Febrina, I. (2012). Trade openness, exchange rate, gross domestic investment, and growth in Indonesia. Accessed June 13, 2016, from http://iafor.org/archives/offprints/acss2012offprints/ACSS2012_0108.pdf
  51. Yusuf, M., Malarvizhi, C. A., & Khin, A. A. (2013). Trade liberalization economic growth and poverty reduction in Nigeria. Available at SSRN 2371117.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theophilus Acheampong
    • 1
  • Ernest Amoabeng Ortsin
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Economics, Aberdeen Centre for Research in Energy Economics and Finance (ACREEF)University of AberdeenAberdeenUK
  2. 2.Legon Centre for International Affairs and Diplomacy (LECIAD)University of GhanaAccraGhana

Personalised recommendations