Advertisement

Scientist Because Philosopher, Philosopher Because Scientist

  • Felice Cimatti
Chapter
Part of the Biosemiotics book series (BSEM, volume 18)

Abstract

Why did Prodi, while engaged in his scientific work, begin to study and to write philosophy? In this chapter, I will attempt to answer this question. The guiding idea is that Prodi realized that, in order to truly be a scientist, one needs to reflect on what it means to be a scientist. Otherwise, the scientist loses the intrinsically ethico-political dimension of his or her work. But once Prodi stepped into the philosophical field, he could not stop, since—consistent with his belief in continuity—he realized that every philosophical problem is intimately connected with others. Prodi the scientist becomes Prodi the philosopher.

Keywords

Science Philosophy Critical thought Darwin 

BibliographyIn ItalianOther Works Cited

  1. Alač, M., & Violi, P. (Eds.). (2004). In the beginning: Origins of semiosis, Semiotic and Cognitive Studies 12. Bologna: Brepols.Google Scholar
  2. Barbieri, M. (2000). I codici organici: La nascita della biologia semantica. (Capire la vita 1.) Ancona: peQuod editore.Google Scholar
  3. Cimatti, F. (2000a). Nel segno del cerchio: L’ontologia semiotica di Giorgio Prodi. Roma: Il manifesto Libri.Google Scholar
  4. Cobley, P. (2016). Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics, Biosemiotics 15. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eco, U. (2004). Origins of semiosis. In: Alač, Violi 2004: 25–30.Google Scholar
  6. Hoffmeyer, J. (2009). Biosemiotics: An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.Google Scholar
  7. Petrilli, S., & Ponzio, A. (2005). Semiotics unbounded: Interpretive routes through the open network of signs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Prodi, G. (1989b). Biology as natural semiotics. In W. Koch (Ed.), For a semiotics of emotion (pp. 93–110). Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
  9. Bolhuis, J., Brown, G., Richardson, R., & Laland, K. (2011). Darwin in mind: New opportunities for evolutionary psychology. PLoS Biology, 9(7), e1001109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brenner, E., Stahlberg, R., Mancuso, S., Vivanco, J., Baluška, F., & Van Volkenburgh, E. (2006). Plant neurobiology: An integrated view of plant signaling. Trends in Plant Science, 11(8), 413–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species, the co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Dobzhansky, T. (1968). On some fundamental concepts of Darwinian biology. In T. Dobzhansky, M. Hecht, & W. Steere (Eds.), Evolutionary biology (pp. 1–34). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felice Cimatti
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Studi UmanisticiUniversità della CalabriaArcavacata di Rende CSItaly

Personalised recommendations