Advertisement

Co-Creation pp 129-145 | Cite as

Harnessing the Synergy Potential of Open Source Hardware Communities

  • Robert MiesEmail author
  • Jérémy Bonvoisin
  • Roland Jochem
Chapter
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

Open source hardware is an upcoming phenomenon which bears an enormous potential for reframing the social organization of product development and therewith to disrupt conventional industrial practices. The open source movement has not just contributed greatly to the advancement of the internet, renowned open source software projects like the Apache project or Linux project have been accelerated tremendously through company participation while retaining their community structures. This article therefore raises awareness on commonly shared values in the open source hardware (OSH) domain and how to go about managing company participation in open source hardware communities. It addresses some of the most salient aspects of switching from a proprietary logic to an open source paradigm and gives practical advice towards this transition. Therefore, comparisons between the proprietary and the open source logic are drawn along seven themes: co-designing vs. open source product development, global vs. local sourcing, exclusivity vs. reciprocity, mass vs. niche focus, hierarchical vs. self-governed workflows, control vs. self-propelled learning, and company vs. community IT infrastructure. This leads to the identification of practical recommendations for companies interested to engage in open source hardware communities. This guidance will help managers to better navigate their companies within community environments, to identify the kind of contributions they can offer, and ultimately to realize the full potential of synergy advantages.

Keywords

Open source hardware Open source hardware communities Open source product development 

References

  1. Abhari, K., Davidson, E., & Xiao, B. S. (2016). Taking open innovation to the next level: A conceptual model of social product development (SPD). In: AMCIS 2016 Proceedings.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlemann, F., Teuteberg, F., & Vogelsang, K. (2009). Project management standards–diffusion and application in Germany and Switzerland. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aksulu, A., & Wade, M. (2010). A comprehensive review and synthesis of open source research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(11), 576–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balka, K., Raasch, C., & Herstatt, C. (2010). How open is open source? – Software and beyond. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 248–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boisseau, É., Omhover, J. F., & Bouchard, C. (2018). Open design: A state of the art review. Design Science, 4.Google Scholar
  7. Bonvoisin, J., & Boujut, J. F. (2015, July). Open design platforms for open source product development: Current state and requirements. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on engineering design (ICED 15), 8—Innovation and Creativity, pp. 11–22. Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
  8. Bonvoisin, J., & Schmidt, K. C. (2017). Best practices of open source mechanical hardware – A guide with practical advice for sharing product-related documentation – Version 1.0.Google Scholar
  9. Bonvoisin, J., Mies, R., Boujut, J.-F., & Stark, R. (2017). What is the source of open source hardware? Journal of Open Hardware, 1(1), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brandon-Jones, E., Dutordoir, M., Neto, J. Q. F., & Squire, B. (2017). The impact of reshoring decisions on shareholder wealth. Journal of Operations Management, 49, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carillo, K., & Okoli, C. (2008). The open source movement: A revolution in software development. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  12. Cova, B., & Dalli, D. (2009). Working consumers: The next step in marketing theory? Marketing theory, 9(3), 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fjelsted, A. S., Adalsteinsdottir, G., Howard, T. J., & McAloone, T. C. (2012). Open design consulting: How to capitalise on and adapt to open source practices for tangible products. Open Design Consulting. M.Sc. Thesis in Management Engineering Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
  15. Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest, 16, 3–18.Google Scholar
  16. Gacek, C., & Arief, B. (2004). The many meanings of open source. IEEE Software, 21(1), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grant, R. M. (2010). Contemporary strategy analysis (p. 272). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1992). Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. In L. Werin & H. Wijkander (Eds.), Contract economics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Kahn, K. B., Barczak, G., Nicholas, J., Ledwith, A., & Perks, H. (2012). An examination of new product development best practice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, G. K., & Cole, R. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organization Science, 14(6), 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, Z., Seering, W., Ramos, J. D., Yang, M., & Wallace, D. R. (2017). Why open source?: Exploring the motivations of using an open model for hardware development. In: ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.Google Scholar
  22. Piller, F. T., Schubert, P., Koch, M., & Möslein, K. (2005, July 1). Overcoming mass confusion: Collaborative customer co-design in online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 10(4), JCMC1042.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00271.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piller, F. T., Vossen, A., & Ihl, C. (2012). From social media to social product development: The impact of social media on co-creation of innovation. Die Unternehmung, 65(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pons, D. (2008). Project management for new product development. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance (1st ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., & Balka, K. (2009). On the open design of tangible goods. R&D Management, 39(4), 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
  28. Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. West, J., & O’Mahony, S. (2008). The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Industry & Innovation, 15(2), 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ye, Y., & Kishida, K. (2003). Toward an understanding of the motivation Open Source Software developers. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on software engineering (pp. 419–429). Portland: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Mies
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jérémy Bonvoisin
    • 2
  • Roland Jochem
    • 1
  1. 1.Technische Universität Berlin, Institute for Machine Tools and Factory Management, Chair of Quality ScienceBerlinGermany
  2. 2.University of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations