• Kenneth J. Tennessen


Dragonfly nymphs are major components of aquatic ecosystems. Species identification is critical for studies on their biology and conservation. Of the 330 species of Anisoptera in North America, the nymphs of approximately 85% have been formally described. Illustrated keys and diagnoses for the seven families, 72 genera, and 325 species are provided. Five species are unknown in the nymph stage.


  1. Benke AC, Crowley PH, Johnson DM (1982) Interactions among coexisting larval Odonata: an in situ experiment using small enclosures. Hydrobiologia 94:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanke A, Greve C, Mokso R, Beckman F, Misof B (2013) An updated phylogeny of Anisoptera including formal convergence analysis of morphological characters. Syst Entomol 38:474–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown JM, McPeek MA, May ML (2000) A phylogenetic perspective on habitat shifts and diversity in the North American Enallagma damselflies. Syst Biol 49:697–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burkle LA, Milhajevic JR, Smith KG (2012) Effects of an invasive plant transcend ecosystem boundaries through a dragonfly-mediated trophic pathway. Oecologia 170:1045–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bybee SM, Hansen Q, Büsse S, Cahill Wightman HM, Branham MA (2015) For consistency’s sake: the precise use of larva, nymph and naiad within Insecta. Syst Entomol 40:667–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carle F, Kjer KM, May ML (2015) A molecular phylogeny and classification of Anisoptera (Odonata). Arthropod Syst Phylogeny 73:281–301Google Scholar
  7. Comstock JH (1918) Nymphs, naiads, and larvae. Ann Entomol Soc Am 11(2):222–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbet PS (1963) A biology of dragonflies. Quadrangle Books, Chicago, 247 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Corbet PS (1999) Dragonflies. Behavior, ecology of Odonata. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca/New York, 829 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Cordoba-Aguilar A (2008) Dragonflies and damselflies. Model organisms for ecological and evolutionary Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 290 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DuBois RB (2016) Detection probabilities and sampling rates for Anisoptera exuviae along river banks: influences of bank vegetation type, prior precipitation, and exuviae size. Int J Odonatol 18:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleck G (2004) Contribution à la connaissance des Odonates de Guyane française. Les larves de Macrothemis pumila Karsh, 1889, et de Brechmorhoga praedatrix Calvert, 1909. Notes biologiques et conséquences taxonomiques (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Annales de la Société entomologique de France (NS) 40(2):177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fleck G, Brenk M, Misof B (2008) Larval and molecular characters help to solve phylogenetic puzzles in the highly diverse dragonfly family Libellulidae (Insecta: Odonata: Anisoptera): The Tetrathemistinae are a polyphyletic group. Org Divers Evol 8:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalkman VJ, Clausnitzer V, Dijkstra K-DB, Orr AG, Paulson DR, van Tol J (2008) Global diversity of dragonflies (Odonata) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595(1):351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knight TM, McCoy MW, Chase JM, McCoy KA, Holt RD (2005) Trophic cascades across ecosystems. Nature 437:880–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kohli MK, Ware JL, Bechly G (2016) How to date a dragonfly: Fossil calibrations for odonates. Palaeontol Electron 19(1.1FC):1–14Google Scholar
  17. Letsch H, Gottsberger B, Ware JL (2016) Not going with the flow: a comprehensive time-calibrated phylogeny of dragonflies (Anisoptera: Odonata: Insecta) provides evidence for the role of lentic habitats on diversification. Mol Ecol 25:1340–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McPeek MA (1998) The consequences of changing the top predator in a food web: a comparative experimental approach. Ecol Monogr 68(1):1–23Google Scholar
  19. Merritt RW, Stewart KW, Berg MB (eds) (2008) An Introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, 1158 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Pilgrim EM, von Dohlen CD (2008) Phylogeny of the Sympetrinae (Odonata: Libellulidae): further evidence of the homoplasious nature of wing venation. Syst Entomol 33:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Raebel EM, Mercls T, Riordan P, McDonald DW, Thompson DJ (2010) The dragonfly delusion: why it is essential to sample exuviae to avoid biased surveys. J Insect Conserv 14:523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramirez A, Novelo-Gutiérrez R (1999) The Neotropical dragonfly genus Macrothemis: new larval descriptions and an evaluation of its generic status based on larval stages (Odonata: Libellulidae). J N Am Benthol Soc 18(1):67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rédei R, Štys P (2016) Larva, nymph and naiad – for accuracy’s sake. Syst Entomol 41:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Resh VH, Cardé RT (eds) (2009) Encyclopedia of insects. Academic, Elsevier, 1132 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Stoks R, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2012) Evolutionary ecology of Odonata: a complex life cycle perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 57:249–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF (2005) Borror and DeLong’s introduction to the study of insects. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, 864 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Truman JW, Riddiford LM (1999) The origins of insect metamorphosis. Nature 401:447–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Walker EM (1966) On the generic status of Tetragoneuria and Epicordulia (Odonata: Corduliidae). Can Entomol 98(9):897–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Westfall MJ Jr (1976) Taxonomic relationships of Diceratobasis macrogaster (Selys) and Phylolestes ethelae Christiansen of the West Indies as revealed by their larvae (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae, Synlestidae). Odonatologica 5(1):65–76Google Scholar
  30. Westfall MJ Jr (1988) Elasmothemis gen. nov., a new genus related to Dythemis (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 17(4):419–428Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth J. Tennessen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Florida State Collection of ArthropodsGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.WautomaUSA

Personalised recommendations