Advertisement

CTA: Instrumental Evaluation

  • Domiziano Coppacchioli
  • Giacomo Ponte
  • Tony Mangano
Chapter

Abstract

The first cases of glenohumeral arthritis occurring with tears of the rotator cuff were described by Adams and Smith in the 1850s [1]. In 1983 Neer described a massive rotator cuff tear as the initial event in the development of degenerative arthritis, with a final spectrum of this condition ranging from superior migration of the humeral head with only regional chondromalacia to collapse of the humeral head with full-thickness cartilage defects. Neer defined this condition “cuff tear arthropathy” (CTA) and identified the diagnostic hallmarks in the superior humeral migration and diminished acromiohumeral distance, erosion of the great tuberosity (“femoralization”) and of the inferior aspect of the acromion (“acetabularization”), joint space narrowing, and other arthritic changes at the glenohumeral joint [2]. All of these features have been variably considered by the historical works upon CTA, especially those dealing with the radiographic classifications, and have been widely accepted as the hallmarks not only of the diagnosis but also of the natural evolution itself of this pathology.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith JG. Pathologic appearance of seven cases of injury of the shoulder joint with remarks. London Medical Gazette. 1834;14:280.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neer CS 2nd, Craig EV, Fukuda H. Cuff-tear arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:1232–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Visotsky JL, Bassamania C, Seebauer L, Rockwood CA, Jensen KL. Cuff tear arthropathy: pathogenesis, classification and algorithm for treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(2):35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y. Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;254:92–6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kappe T, Cakir B, Reichel H, Elsharkawi M. Reliability of radiologic classification for cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20(4):543–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moor BK, Wieser K, Slankamenac K, Gerber C, Bouaicha S. Relationship of individual scapular anatomy and degenerative rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23(4):536–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bjarnison AO, Sørensen TJ, Kallemose T, Barfod KW. The critical shoulder angle is associated with osteoarthritis in the shoulder but not rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-control study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26(12):2097–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mantell MT, Nelson R, Lowe JT, Endrizzi DP, Jawa A. Critical shoulder angle associated with full-thickness rotator cuff tears in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26(12):e376–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bianchi S, Prato N, Martinoli C, Derchi LE. Shoulder radiography. In: Imaging of the shoulder, vol. 1. New York: Springer; 2004. p. 4–5.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Prato N, et al. US of the shoulder: non-rotator cuff disorders. Radiographics. 2003;23:381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huber DJ, Sauter R, Mueller E, et al. MR imaging of the normal shoulder. Radiology. 1986;158:405–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iannotti JP, Zlatkin MB, Esterhai JL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seeger LL, Ruszkowski JT, Bassett LW, et al. MR imaging of the normal shoulder. Anatomic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Snyder SJ. Arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff lesions and surgical decision making. In: Snyder SJ, editor. Shoulder arthroscopy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. p. 201–7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi S, Kim MK, Kim GM, Roh YH, Hwang IK, Kang H. Factors associated with clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a suture bridge technique in medium, large, and massive tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23:1675–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goutallier D, Bernageau J, Patte D. Assessment of the trophicity of the muscles of the ruptured rotator cuff by CT scan. In: Post M, Morrey B, Hawkins R, editors. Surgery of the shoulder. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1990. p. 11–3.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures: pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;304:78–83.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C. Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1999;8:599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goutallier D, Postel JM, Gleyze P, Leguilloux P, Van Driessche S. Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2003;12:550–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deniz G, Kose O, Tugay A, Guler F, Turan A. Fatty degeneration and atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles after arthroscopic repair: does it improve, halt or deteriorate? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:985–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gladstone JN, Bishop JY, Lo IK, Flatow EL. Fatty infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:719–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(7):677–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baudi P, Righi P, Bolognesi D, Rivetta S, Rossi Urtoler E, Giucciardi N, Carrara M. How to identify and calculate glenoid bone deficit. Chir Organi Mov. 2005;90(2):145–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplast. 1999;14(6):756–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bercik MJ, Kruse K II, Yalizis M, Gauci M-O, Chaoui J, Walch G. A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25:1601–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Domiziano Coppacchioli
    • 1
  • Giacomo Ponte
    • 2
  • Tony Mangano
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyOspedale San GiuseppeEmpoliItaly
  2. 2.Unit of RadiodiagnosticGruppoMedGenoaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyCasa di Cura Villa IgeaAcqui TermeItaly
  4. 4.Unit of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryOspedale Humanitas—San Pio XMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations