Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has been indicated primarily for patients aged older than 65 years with symptomatic rotator cuff deficiency, poor function, and pain. However, conditions that benefit from RTSA are not restricted to an elderly population. This study evaluates a consecutive series of RTSA patients aged younger than 50 years.
Methods: We evaluated 11 patients (mean age, 52.4 years) at a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (range, 4.8–1.5 years). Of these shoulders, 8% (72.7%) had previous surgery; the preoperative conditions compelling RTSA were as follows: failed rotator cuff repair (2), fracture sequelae (3), failed hemiarthroplasty (3). Follow-up examinations included range-of-motion and strength testing, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Constant score. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed for component loosening and scapular notching.
Results: The ASES score significantly improved from a preoperative mean of 31.1 to a postoperative mean of 69.2%. The mean active elevation improved from 59 to 135°. The normalized postoperative mean Constant score was 58.
Conclusion: RTSA can improve shoulder function in a younger, complex patient population with poor preoperative functional ability. This study’s success rate was 85% at 3.3 years. This is a limited-goals procedure, and longer-term studies are required to determine whether similar results are maintained over time.
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) ASES Score American Shoulder And Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Scapular Notching Failed Rotator Cuff Repair
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, Williams GR, Ramsey ML, Kurtz SM. Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19:1115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattrup SJ, Cofield RH. Osteonecrosis of the humeral head: results of replacement. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2000;9:177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovelius L, Sandström B, Saebö M. One hundred eighteen Bristow-Latarjet repairs for recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder prospectively followed for fifteen years: study II—the evolution of dislocation arthropathy. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006;15:279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon MT, Inacio MC, Burke MF, Navarro RA, Yian EH. Shoulder arthroplasty in patients 59 years of age and younger. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22:1338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulieri P, Dunning P, Klein S, Pupello D, Frankle M. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y. Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;254:92–6.Google Scholar
Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1742–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar