Introduction and Classifications

  • Mario Borroni
  • Giacomo Delle Rose
  • Alessandro Castagna


Proximal humeral fractures are very common and incidence is very different considering the age.


Proximal Humeral Fractures Greater Tuberosity Neer Classification Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Glenohumeral Dislocation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Bigliani LU, E F. Fractures of the proximal humerus. In: Green RA, editor. Fractures in adults. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norris T. Fractures of the proximal humerus and dislocations of the shoulder. In: Jupiter J, Browner BD, editors. Skeletal trauma. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992. p. 1201–90.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baron J, Barret J, Malenka D. Racial difference in fracture risk. Epidemiology. 1994;5:42–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kristiansen B, Barfod g, Bredesen J. Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;68:75–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kocher T. Bietrage zur Kenntnis einigir praktisch wichtiger Fracturen-formen. Basel: Carl Sallman Verlag; 1896.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Codman E. The shoulder: rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. Boston: Thomas Todd; 1934.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neer C. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: part I Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1077–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horak J, Nilsson B. Epidemiology of fractures of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop. 1975;112:250–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kristiansen B, Christansen S. Proximal humeral fractures. Late results in relation to classification and treatment. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58:124–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sidor M, Zuckerman J, Lyon T, Koval K, Cuomo F, Schoenberg N. The Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures: an assessment of inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1745–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cowell H. Patient care and scientific freedom. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76:640–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siebenrock K, Gerber C. The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1751–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:427–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sukthankar A, Leonello D, Hertel R, Ding G, Sandow M. A comprehensive classification of proximal humeral fractures: HGLS system. J Shoulder Elbow. 2013;22:e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Okike K, Lee O, Makanji H, Harris M, Vrahas M. Factors associated with the decision for operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. Injury. 2013;44:448–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tepass A, Rolauffs B, Weise K, Bahrs S, Dietz K, Bahrs C. Complication rates and outcomes stratified by treatment modalities in proximal humeral fractures: a systematic literature review from 1970–2009. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7:34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Borroni
    • 1
  • Giacomo Delle Rose
    • 1
  • Alessandro Castagna
    • 1
  1. 1.Humanitas Research Hospital, RozzanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations