Advertisement

Benthic Macroinvertebrates as Indicators for River Health in Changjiang Basin

  • Fengzhi He
  • Xiaoling Sun
  • Xiaoyu Dong
  • Qinghua Cai
  • Sonja C. Jähnig
Chapter
Part of the Terrestrial Environmental Sciences book series (TERENVSC)

Abstract

Rivers have been associated with development of human society. Rivers and its associated freshwater ecosystems provide multiple ecosystems services for humans [1, 2]. For example, they supply fresh water for drinking, agriculture, domestic and industrial use. Food (e.g. fish) provided by freshwater ecosystems is important protein resource for millions of people in regions such as Mekong river basin [3].

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) through the project “Integrated modelling of the response of aquatic ecosystems to land use and climate change in the Poyang Lake region, China” (JA 1827/2-1; FO 301/14-1; 40911130508) as part of the NSFC/DFG joint funding programme “Land Use and Water Resources Management under Changing Environmental Conditions”. FH was supported by the SMART Joint Doctorate (Science for the MAnagement of Rivers and their Tidal systems), funded with the support of the Erasmus Mundus programme of the European Union. SCJ acknowledges funding through “GLANCE” project (Global Change Effects in River Ecosystems; 01 LN1320A; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF).

References

  1. 1.
    Postel, S., and S. Carpenter, et al. 1997. Freshwater ecosystem services. In Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, 195.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Current state and trends. In Millennium ecosystem assessment, global assessment reports.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sabo, J.L., et al. 2017. Designing river flows to improve food security futures in the lower Mekong Basin. Science 358 (6368): eaao1053.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vörösmarty, C.J., et al. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467 (7315): 555–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zarfl, C., A.E. Lumsdon, J. Berlekamp, L. Tydecks, and K. Tockner. 2015. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquatic Sciences 77 (1): 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Couto, T.B, and J.D. Olden. 2018. Global proliferation of small hydropower plants-science and policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16(2): 91–100.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwarzenbach, R.P., T. Egli, T.B. Hofstetter, U. Von Gunten, and B. Wehrli. 2010. Global water pollution and human health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35: 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collen, B., et al. 2014. Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism. Global Ecology and Biogeography 23 (1): 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wallace, J.B., and J.R. Webster. 1996. The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function. Annual Review of Entomology 41 (1): 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bae, Y.J., H.K. Kil, and K.S. Bae. 2005. Benthic macroinvertebrates for uses in stream biomonitoring and restoration. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 9 (1): 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Metcalfe, J.L. 1989. Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: History and present status in Europe. Environmental Pollution 60 (1–2): 101–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rehn, A.C. 2009. Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of biological condition below hydropower dams on west slope Sierra Nevada streams, California, USA. River Research and Applications 25 (2): 208–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friberg, N., J. Skriver, S.E. Larsen, M.L. Pedersen, and A. Buffagni. 2010. Stream macroinvertebrate occurrence along gradients in organic pollution and eutrophication. Freshwater Biology 55 (7): 1405–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    He, F., et al. 2014. River ecosystem health assessment of the Shennongjia Forest Region. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology 20 (1): 35–39.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sponseller, R.A., E.F. Benfield, and H.M. Valett. 2001. Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology 46 (10): 1409–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, F., Q. Cai, and L. Ye. 2010. Developing a benthic index of biological integrity and some relationships to environmental factors in the subtropical Xiangxi River, China. International Review of Hydrobiology 95 (2): 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang, X., Z. Song, J. Xiong, and Z. Xie. 2014. Can excluding non-insect taxa from stream macroinvertebrate surveys enhance the sensitivity of taxonomic distinctness indices to human disturbance? Ecological Indicators 41: 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fang, J., et al. 2006. Biodiversity changes in the lakes of the Central Yangtze. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4 (7): 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang, L.L., Z.Q. Wu, and J.H. Li. 2013. Fish fauna, biogeography and conservation of freshwater fish in Poyang Lake Basin, China. Environmental Biology of Fishes 96 (10–11): 1229–1243.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, Y., et al. 2013. Optimising hydrological conditions to sustain wintering waterbird populations in Poyang Lake National Natural Reserve: Implications for dam operations. Freshwater Biology 58 (11): 2366–2379.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duan, W., et al. 2016. Water quality assessment and pollution source identification of the eastern Poyang Lake Basin using multivariate statistical methods. Sustainability 8 (2): 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sun, X. 2012. Community structure of benthic macroinvertebrate in the Changjiang River and its influencing factors. PhD thesis. Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rankin, E.T. 1995. Habitat indices in water resource quality assessments. Biological assessment and criteria: Tools for water resource planning and decision making, 181–208.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hughes, R.M., A.T. Herlihy, and P.R. Kaufmann. 2010. An evaluation of qualitative indexes of physical habitat applied to agricultural streams in ten US states. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46 (4): 792–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu, W., Z. Xu, X. Yin, and D. Zuo. 2014. Assessment of ecosystem health based on fish assemblages in the Wei River basin, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 186 (6): 3701–3716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Biggs, B.F.J., and C. Kilroy. 2000. In Stream periphyton monitoring manual. Wellington.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morse, J.C., L. Yang, and L. Tian. 1994. Aquatic insects of China useful for monitoring water quality. Nanjing, People’s Republic of China: Hohai University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Merritt, R.W., and K.W. Cummins. 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall Hunt.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Camargo, J.A., A. Alonso, and M. la Puente. 2005. Eutrophication downstream from small reservoirs in mountain rivers of Central Spain. Water Research 39 (14): 3376–3384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guisande, C., et al. 2017. DER: An algorithm for comparing species diversity between assemblages. Ecological Indicators 81: 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gamito, S. 2010. Caution is needed when applying Margalef diversity index. Ecological Indicators 10 (2): 550–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Paisley, M.F., D.J. Trigg, and W.J. Walley. 2014. Revision of the biological monitoring working party (BMWP) score system: Derivation of presentonly and abundance-related scores from field data. River Research and Applications 30 (7): 887–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Quantum GIS Development Team. 2014. Quantum GIS geographic information system. Open source geospatial foundation project.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sun, X., Q. Cai, F. Li, S. Yang, and L. Tan. 2011. Modification of river health comprehensive assessment index and its application in Changjiang River. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment 27: 98–103.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huang, X., et al. 2012. A high-resolution ammonia emission inventory in China. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 26 (1).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Camargo, J.A., and Á. Alonso. 2006. Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment. Environment International 32 (6): 831–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    He, F., X. Dong, M. Sun, and Q. Cai. 2015. Altitudinal pattern of stream periphyton biomass in tributaries of the Lancang-Mekong River: An indicator of anthropogenic impact? Quaternary International 380: 282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sánchez-Montoya, M.M., M.R. Vidal-Abarca, and M.L. Suárez. 2010. Comparing the sensitivity of diverse macroinvertebrate metrics to a multiple stressor gradient in Mediterranean streams and its influence on the assessment of ecological status. Ecological Indicators 10 (4): 896–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    He, F., W. Jiang, T. Tang, and Q. Cai. 2015. Assessing impact of acid mine drainage on benthic macroinvertebrates: Can functional diversity metrics be used as indicators? Journal of Freshwater Ecology 30 (4): 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Buss, D.F., et al. 2015. Stream biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates around the globe: A comparison of large-scale programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187 (1): 4132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Li, F., et al. 2012. Characterizing macroinvertebrate communities across China: Large-scale implementation of a self-organizing map. Ecological Indicators 23: 394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tonkin, J.D., et al. 2015. Climatic and catchment-scale predictors of Chinese stream insect richness differ between taxonomic groups. PloS One 10 (4): e0123250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Marshall, J.C., A.L. Steward, and B.D. Harch. 2006. Taxonomic resolution and quantification of freshwater macroinvertebrate samples from an Australian dryland river: The benefits and costs of using species abundance data. Hydrobiologia 572 (1): 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Heino, J., and J. Soininen. 2007. Are higher taxa adequate surrogates for species-level assemblage patterns and species richness in stream organisms? Biological Conservation 137 (1): 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhou, C., H. Gui, and K. Zhou. 2003. Larval key to families of Ephemeroptera from China (Insecta) (in Chinese). Journal of Nanjing Normal University 26 (2): 65–68.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kuemmerlen, M., et al. 2015. An attack on two fronts: Predicting how changes in land use and climate affect the distribution of stream macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 60 (7): 1443–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schmalz, B., et al. 2015. Impacts of land use changes on hydrological components and macroinvertebrate distributions in the Poyang lake area. Ecohydrology 8 (6): 1119–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and BiotechnologyInstitute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland FisheriesBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Biology, Freie UniversitätBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Southern University of Science and TechnologyShenzhenChina
  5. 5.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringShenzhen Academy of Environmental SciencesShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations