Advertisement

Marx’s Morality for All

  • Robert X. Ware
Chapter
Part of the Marx, Engels, and Marxisms book series (MAENMA)

Abstract

Marx was a moralist. He held moral principles and condemned those who disregarded what was right and good. His materialist conception of history was an explanation of a world that had gone wrong, with support from political laws, but could be set right. He appealed to “the simple laws of morals and justice, which ought to govern the relations of private individuals” (Inaugural Address to the International). Some think that moralities are relative to the times and culture, but there are pitfalls in attempts at establishing different moralities.

Marx did not have a theory of morality, but he took moral positions that he applied universally, even where others might apply them differently. For Marx the International would have one morality for all.

References

  1. Note: References to the work of Frederick Engels and Karl Marx are from Karl Marx, Frederick Engels, Collected Works. 50 Volumes, 1975–2004. New York, NY: International Publishers. (Referred to in text as “MECW” with volume and page).Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, G.A. 1983. Review of Allen W. Wood, Karl Marx. Mind 92 (367): 440–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 1988. Freedom, Justice, and Capitalism. In History, Labour, and Freedom, ed. G.A. Cohen, 286–304. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1995. Self-ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowling, Mark. 2018. Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights: Controversy and Analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edgley, Roy. 1990. Marxism, Morality and Mr. Lukes. In Socialism and Morality, ed. David McLellan and Sean Sayers, 21–41. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gabriel, Mary. 2011. Love and Capital: Karl and Jenny Marx and the Birth of a Revolution. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  9. Geras, Norman. 1986. The Controversy About Marx and Justice. In Literature of Revolution: Essays on Marxism, ed. Norman Geras, 3–57. London, UK: Verso. (Originally in New Left Review, #150, 1985).Google Scholar
  10. Harman, Gilbert, and Judith Jarvis Thomson. 1996. Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Miller, Richard W. 1984. Analyzing Marx: Morality, Power and History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Nielsen, Kai. 1989. Marxism and the Moral Point of View. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. Peffer, R.G. 1990. Marxism, Morality, and Social Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shun, Kwong-Loi, and David B. Wong, eds. 2004. Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ware, Robert. 2013. Reflections on Chinese Marxism. Socialism and Democracy 27 (1): 136–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wood, Allen W. 2004 [1981]. Karl Marx. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2014. The Free Development of Each: Studies on Freedom, Right, and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy (with chapter on “Marx on Equality”). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert X. Ware
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations