Advertisement

Enabling Post-truth: Mediatisation and Affect

  • Ignas Kalpokas
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter first analyses the context of post-truth, namely, mediatisation, understood as the dominance of media logic in most social spheres. Such dominance has profound influence on both the political and the personal domains. In both cases, affective capacity has become of prime importance since encounters primarily take place in and through the media, meaning that one’s social existence depends on the effectiveness of leaving an affective imprint on others. A theory of affective capacity is provided through a snapshot of the philosophy of Spinoza, focusing primarily on the centrality of striving to persevere in existence. The latter, in turn, refers to a deficit at the heart of existence which is the cause of a relentless (but futile) desire to achieve the pleasure of fullness.

Keywords

Mediatisation Participation Digital effigies Affect Spinoza Striving 

References

  1. Adolf, M. T. (2017). The Identity of Mediatization: Theorizing a Dynamic Field. In O. Driessens, et al. (Eds.), Dynamics of Mediatization: Institutional Change and Everyday Transformations in a Digital Age (pp. 11–34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ampuja, M., Koivisto, J., & Väliverronen, E. (2014). Strong and Weak Forms of Mediatization Theory: A Critical Review. Nordicom Review, 35, 111–123.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, J. (2018). Archiving, Ordering, and Searching: Search Engines, Algorithms, Databases, and Deep Mediatization. Media, Culture & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718754652.
  4. Bakardjieva, M., Felt, M., & Dumitrica, D. (2018). The Mediatization of Leadership: Grassroots Digital Facilitators as Organic Intellectuals, Sociometric Stars and Caretakers. Information, Communication & Society, 21(6), 899–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balibar, E. (1998). Spinoza and Politics. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billig, M. (2013). Learn to Write Badly: How to Succeed in the Social Sciences. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boler, M., et al. (2014). Connective Labor and Social Media: Women’s Roles in the ‘Leaderless’ Occupy Movement. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 20(4), 438–460.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, S. D., & Stenner, P. (2001). Being Affected: Spinoza and the Psychology of Emotion. International Journal of Group Tensions, 30(1), 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burkitt, I. (2014). Emotions and Social Relations. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carnera, A. (2012). The Affective Turn: The Ambivalence of Biopolitics Within Modern Labour and Management. Culture and Organization, 18(1), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casero-Ripollés, A., Feenstra, R. A., & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign: The Case of Podemos and the Two-Way Street Mediatization of Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 378–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clough, P. T. (2008). The Affective Turn: Political Economy, Biomedia and Bodies. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments. Communication Theory, 23, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge and Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2018). The Continuing Lure of the Mediated Centre in Times of Deep Mediatization: Media Events and Its Enduring Legacy. Media, Culture & Society, 40(1), 114–117.Google Scholar
  18. Damasio, A. (2018). The Strange Order of Things: Life, Feeling, and the Making of Cultures. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, E. (2017). Post-truth: How We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  20. Deacon, D., & Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: Key Concept or Conceptual Bandwagon? Media, Culture and Society, 36(7), 1032–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
  22. Deleuze, G. (1997). Spinoza and the Three ‘Ethics’. In W. Montag & T. Stolze (Eds.), The New Spinoza (pp. 21–36). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Della Rocca, M. (2008). Rationalism Run Amok: Representation and Reality of Emotions in Spinoza. In C. Huenemann (Ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 26–52). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Döveling, K., Harju, A. A., & Sommer, D. (2018). From Mediatized Emotion to Digital Affect Cultures: New Technologies and Global Flows of Emotion. Social Media + Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117743141.
  25. Driesens, O., et al. (2010). Personalization According to Politicians: A Practice Theoretical Analysis of Mediatization. Communications, 35(3), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flew, T., & Swift, A. (2015). Engaging, Persuading, and Entertaining Citizens: Mediatization and the Australian Political Public Sphere. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(1), 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fuchs, T. (2007). Fragmented Selves: Temporality and Identity in Borderline Personality Disorder. Psychopathology, 40, 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garland, R., Tambini, D., & Couldry, N. (2018). Has Government Been Mediatized? A UK Perspective. Media, Culture and Society, 40(4), 496–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gehl, R. W., & Bakardjieva, M. (2017). Socialbots and Their Friends. In R. W. Gehl & M. Bakardjieva (Eds.), Socialbots and Their Friends: Digital Media and the Automation of Sociality (pp. 1–15). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Gerbaudo, P. (2017). Social Media Teams as Digital Vanguards: The Question of Leadership in the Management of Key Facebook and Twitter Accounts of Occupy Wall Street, Indignados and UK Uncut. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social Media and Populism: An Elective Affinity? Media, Culture & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192.
  32. Gillespie, T. (2014). The Relevance of Algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (pp. 167–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hallin, D. C. (2018). Mediatisation, Neoliberalism and Populisms: The Case of Trump. Contemporary Social Science.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1426404.
  34. Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for You: The Netflix Prize and the Production of Algorithmic Culture. New Media & Society, 18(1), 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hannan, J. (2018). Trolling Ourselves to Death? Social Media and Post-truth Politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2017). Assembly. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Harsin, J. (2017). Trump l’Œil: Is Trump’s Post-truth Communication Translatable? Contemporary French and Francophone Studies, 21(5), 512–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hepp, A., & Hasebrink, U. (2018). Researching Transforming Communications in Times of Deep Mediatization: A Figurational Approach. In A. Hepp, et al. (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Transforming Communications in Times of Deep Mediatization (pp. 15–48). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hepp, A., Breiter, A., & Hasebrink, U. (2018). Rethinking Transforming Communications: An Introduction. In A. Hepp, et al. (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Transforming Communications in Times of Deep Mediatization (pp. 3–14). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: Theorizing the Interplay Between Media, Culture and Society. Media, Culture and Society, 37(2), 314–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hjarvard, S. (2004). From Bricks to Bytes: The Mediatization of a Global Toy Industry. In I. Bondebjerg & P. Golding (Eds.), European Culture and the Media (pp. 43–63). Bristol: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  42. Hjarvard, S. (2008). The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change. Nordicom Review, 29, 105–134.Google Scholar
  43. Hjarvard, S. (2013). The Mediatization of Culture and Society. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Hodge, R. D. (2010). The Mendacity of Hope: Barack Obama and the Betrayal of American Liberalism. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  45. Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Arrested War: The Third Phase of Mediatisation. Information, Communication & Society, 18(1), 1320–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hübner, K. (2017). The Trouble with Feelings, or Spinoza on the Identity of Power and Essence. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Iosifidis, P., & Wheeler, M. (2018). Modern Political Communication and Web 2.0 in Representative Democracies. Javnost—The Public, 25(1–2), 110–118.Google Scholar
  48. Isotalus, P., & Almonkari, M. (2014). Mediatization and Political Leadership. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. James, S. (2016). Why Should We Read Spinoza? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 78, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jansson, A. (2018). Mediatization and Mobile Lives: A Critical Approach. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Jaquet, C. (2017). From the Self to Oneself: Subject and Interiority in Spinoza. The New Centennial Review, 17(2), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jones, P. (2012). Sensory Indiscipline and Affect: A Study of Commuter Cycling. Social and Cultural Geography, 13(6), 645–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kalpokas, I. (2018). Creativity and Limitation in Political Communities: Spinoza, Schmitt and Ordering. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Katz, M. (2018, May 1). CGI ‘Influencers’ Like Lil Miquela Are About to Flood Your Feeds. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/lil-miquela-digital-humans?mbid=social_fb. Accessed 1 May.
  55. Kennedy, E. (2004). Constitutional Failure: Carl Schmitt in Weimar. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kortti, J. (2017). Media History and the Mediatization of Everyday Life. Media History, 23(1), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kwon, Y. J., & Kwon, K.-N. (2015). Consuming the Objectified Self: The Quest for Authentic Self. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 301–312.Google Scholar
  58. Laursen, B., & Valentini, C. (2015). Mediatization and Government Communication: Press Work in the European Parliament. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(1), 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  60. Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (2014). Mediatization: An Emerging Paradigm for Media and Communication Studies. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of Communication (pp. 703–724). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
  61. Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2016). Is ‘Mediatization’ the New Paradigm for Our Field? A Commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015). Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 462–470.Google Scholar
  62. Maireder, A., et al. (2017). Big Data and Political Social Networks: Introducing Audience Diversity and Communication Connector Bridging Measures in Social Network Theory. Social Science Computer Review, 35(1), 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Marshall, P. D., & Henderson, N. (2016). Political Persona 2016: An Introduction. Persona Studies, 2(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mazzoleni, G. (2017). Changes in Contemporary Communication Ask for a ‘New Look’ at the Concept of Mediatisation. Javnost—The Public, 24(2), 136–145.Google Scholar
  65. Mazzoleni, G., & Schultz, W. (1999). ‘Mediatization’ of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Miller, J. (2014). The Fourth Screen: Mediatization and the Smartphone. Mobile Media and Communication, 2(2), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Murdock, G. (2017). Mediatisation and the Transformation of Capitalism: The Elephant in the Room. Javnost—The Public, 24(2), 119–135.Google Scholar
  68. Nagle, A. (2017). Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. London: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  69. Olsson, E.-K., & Eriksson, M. (2016). The Role of Public Organizations’ Social Media Use: Toward a Theory of ‘Social Mediatization’. Public Relations Inquiry, 5(2), 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Papacharissi, Z. (2012). Without You, I’m Nothing: Performances of the Self on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 6, 1989–2006.Google Scholar
  71. Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Affective Publics and Structures of Storytelling: Sentiment, Events and Mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 307–324.Google Scholar
  73. Papsdorf, C. (2015). How the Internet Automates Communication. Information, Communication & Society, 18(9), 991–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pile, Steve. (2010). Emotions and Affect in Recent Human Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Poell, T., et al. (2016). Protest Leadership in the Age of Social Media. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 994–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Postill, J. (2018). Populism and Social Media: A Global Perspective. Media, Culture and Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772186.
  77. Ruddick, S. (2010). The Politics of Affect: Spinoza in the Work of Negri and Deleuze. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(4), 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schmitt, C. (2008). Constitutional Theory. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. London and New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  81. Spinoza, B. (2000). Ethics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Street, J. (2018). What Is Donald Trump? Forms of ‘Celebrity’ in Celebrity Politics. Political Studies Review.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918772995.
  83. Strömbäck, J. (2011a). Mediatization and Perceptions of the Media’s Political Influence. Journalism Studies, 12(4), 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Strömbäck, J. (2011b). Mediatization of Politics: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Comparative Research. In E. P. Bucy & R. L. Holbert (Eds.), The Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques (pp. 367–382). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2014). Mediatization of Politics: Towards a Theoretical Framework. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies (pp. 3–28). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2015). Making Sense of the Mediatization of Politics. In J. Strömbäck & F. Esser (Eds.), Making Sense of Mediatized Politics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (pp. 1–13). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect. Geografiska Annaler, 86B(1), 57–78.Google Scholar
  88. Trott, B. (2017). Affective Labour and Alienation: Spinoza’s Materialism and the Sad Passions of Post-Fordist Work. Emotion, Space and Society, 25, 119–126.Google Scholar
  89. Weber, M. (1998). The Sociology of Charismatic Authority. In H. Gerth & S. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 245–252). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Witschge, T. (2014). Passive Accomplice or Active Disruptor: The Role of Audiences in the Mediatization of Politics. Journalism Practice, 8(3), 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesLCC International UniversityKlaipedaLithuania

Personalised recommendations